• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lipid composition and lidocaine effect on immediate and delayed injection pain following propofol administration.脂质成分及利多卡因对丙泊酚给药后即刻和延迟注射痛的影响。
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Jan-Apr;10(1):29-32. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.164728.
2
Pain on injection of propofol: propofol LCT vs propofol MCT/LCT with or without lidocaine pretreatment.丙泊酚注射时的疼痛:长链丙泊酚与中/长链丙泊酚对比,利多卡因预处理与否的影响
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Sep;89 Suppl 3:S86-91.
3
Does addition of lidocaine to medium- and long-chain triglyceride propofol emulsions significantly reduce pain on injection?在中长链甘油三酯丙泊酚乳剂中添加利多卡因是否能显著减轻注射时的疼痛?
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Mar;91(3):383-7.
4
[Propofol-LCT versus propofol-MCT/LCT with or without lidocaine - a comparison on pain on injection].丙泊酚-长链甘油三酯与丙泊酚-中链/长链甘油三酯联用或不联用利多卡因——关于注射痛的比较
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2004 Jan;39(1):10-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815712.
5
Comparison of the preventive effects of pretreatment of lidocaine with a tourniquet and a premixed injection of lidocaine on propofol-LCT/MCT injection pain.比较利多卡因预处理、止血带与预混利多卡因注射对丙泊酚-LCT/MCT 注射痛的预防作用。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Feb;66(2):95-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.95. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
6
Pain on injection: a double-blind comparison of propofol with lidocaine pretreatment versus propofol formulated with long- and medium-chain triglycerides.注射痛:丙泊酚联合利多卡因预处理与长链和中链甘油三酯配制的丙泊酚的双盲比较
Anesth Analg. 2004 Dec;99(6):1699-1702. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136848.54207.97.
7
[Injection pain secondary to propofol-MCT/LCT and propofol-LCT--comparison of prophylaxis with lidocaine].[丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳剂和丙泊酚长链脂肪乳剂所致注射痛——利多卡因预防效果比较]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2003 Oct;38(10):643-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42508.
8
Avoiding propofol injection pain in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.避免儿童丙泊酚注射痛:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Sep;101(3):390-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen169. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
9
Propofol-induced injection pain: comparison of a modified propofol emulsion to standard propofol with premixed lidocaine.丙泊酚诱导的注射痛:改良丙泊酚乳剂与含预混利多卡因的标准丙泊酚的比较
Anesth Analg. 2004 Oct;99(4):1076-1079. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130344.17898.CD.
10
Injection pain of propofol in children: A comparison of two formulations without added lidocaine.丙泊酚用于儿童的注射痛:两种未添加利多卡因制剂的比较。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;28(3):314-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.98322.

引用本文的文献

1
Esketamine prevents propofol-induced injection pain: Randomized controlled trial.艾氯胺酮预防丙泊酚诱导的注射痛:随机对照试验。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 20;13:991559. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.991559. eCollection 2022.
2
Efficacy of Pre-Treatment with Remimazolam on Prevention of Propofol-Induced Injection Pain in Patients Undergoing Abortion or Curettage: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.瑞马唑仑预处理预防人工流产或刮宫术患者丙泊酚注射痛的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021 Nov 4;15:4551-4558. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S334100. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of ephedrine in the prevention of vascular pain associated with different infusion rates of propofol.麻黄碱预防不同丙泊酚输注速率相关血管疼痛的疗效。
Anesth Essays Res. 2014 Sep-Dec;8(3):345-8. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.143137.
2
Comparison of the preventive effects of pretreatment of lidocaine with a tourniquet and a premixed injection of lidocaine on propofol-LCT/MCT injection pain.比较利多卡因预处理、止血带与预混利多卡因注射对丙泊酚-LCT/MCT 注射痛的预防作用。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Feb;66(2):95-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.95. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
3
Lidocaine pretreatment with tourniquet versus lidocaine-propofol admixture for attenuating propofol injection pain: a randomized controlled trial.止血带联合利多卡因预处理与利多卡因-丙泊酚混合液减轻丙泊酚注射痛:一项随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820306da.
4
Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis.预防丙泊酚注射痛的措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2011 Mar 15;342:d1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1110.
5
Prevention of propofol pain: a comparative study.丙泊酚所致疼痛的预防:一项对比研究。
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Feb;20(1):71-4.
6
Does addition of lidocaine to medium- and long-chain triglyceride propofol emulsions significantly reduce pain on injection?在中长链甘油三酯丙泊酚乳剂中添加利多卡因是否能显著减轻注射时的疼痛?
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Mar;91(3):383-7.
7
A comparison of propofol-LCT with propofol-LCT/MCT on pain of injection.丙泊酚-长链甘油三酯与丙泊酚-长链甘油三酯/中链甘油三酯在注射痛方面的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Dec;90(12):2683-8.
8
Pain on injection of propofol: propofol LCT vs propofol MCT/LCT with or without lidocaine pretreatment.丙泊酚注射时的疼痛:长链丙泊酚与中/长链丙泊酚对比,利多卡因预处理与否的影响
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Sep;89 Suppl 3:S86-91.
9
Discomfort on injection: a comparison between two formulations of propofol.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Nov;23(11):971-4. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506001049. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
10
[Comparison of propofol LCT and propofol MCT/LCT regarding the injection pain at different sites and the memory].丙泊酚长链脂肪乳剂与丙泊酚中/长链脂肪乳剂在不同部位注射疼痛及记忆方面的比较
Masui. 2005 Nov;54(11):1241-6.

脂质成分及利多卡因对丙泊酚给药后即刻和延迟注射痛的影响。

Lipid composition and lidocaine effect on immediate and delayed injection pain following propofol administration.

作者信息

Zirak Nahid, Bameshki Alireza, Yazdani Mohammadjavad, Gilani Mehryar Taghavi

机构信息

Cardiac Anesthesia Research Center, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Jan-Apr;10(1):29-32. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.164728.

DOI:10.4103/0259-1162.164728
PMID:26957686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4767075/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propofol has been used for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. However, patients experience vascular pain during its injection.

AIMS

The objective of this study was to compare the effect of the lipid type used in propofol preparations and that of lidocaine on the immediate and delayed vascular pain induced by propofol administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this double-blinded clinical study, 150 patients at American Society of Anesthesiologists level I-II were randomly divided into three equally sized groups. A propofol with medium and long-chain triglycerides (propofol-MCT/LCT) was administered to the first group. The second group received propofol containing propofol-LCT, and the third group received propofol-LCT and pretreatment lidocaine 20 mg. The incidence and the intensity of immediate (during injection) and delayed injection pain (after 20 s) were evaluated on a verbal analog scale (1-10) until patients' unconsciousness.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Sample size was calculated with SigmaPlot version 12.5 software. Data were analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16, one-way analysis of variance, and post-hoc Tukey. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The demographic parameters of the three groups were similar. The lidocaine group experienced the least immediate vascular pain. The intensity of pain was highest in the propofol-LCT group (P = 0.04). Additionally, the intensity of delayed pain was lowest in the propofol-MCT/LCT group (P = 0.01). The incidence of pain associated with the propofol administration was 26.5, 44, and 18%, respectively, in propofol-MCT/LCT, propofol-LCT, and lidocaine and propofol-LCT groups.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate an effect of the lipid type on delayed pain reduction, especially propofol-MCT/LCT. On the other hand, the lidocaine decreases immediate propofol-LCT vascular pain.

摘要

背景

丙泊酚已用于麻醉诱导和维持。然而,患者在注射丙泊酚期间会经历血管疼痛。

目的

本研究的目的是比较丙泊酚制剂中使用的脂质类型与利多卡因对丙泊酚给药引起的即刻和延迟血管疼痛的影响。

材料与方法

在这项双盲临床研究中,150名美国麻醉医师协会I-II级患者被随机分为三组,每组人数相等。第一组给予含中长链甘油三酯的丙泊酚(丙泊酚-MCT/LCT)。第二组接受含丙泊酚-LCT的丙泊酚,第三组接受丙泊酚-LCT和20 mg利多卡因预处理。在视觉模拟量表(1-10)上评估即刻(注射期间)和延迟注射疼痛(20秒后)的发生率和强度,直至患者失去意识。

统计分析

使用SigmaPlot 12.5软件计算样本量。数据用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)16版进行分析,采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

三组的人口统计学参数相似。利多卡因组经历的即刻血管疼痛最少。丙泊酚-LCT组的疼痛强度最高(P = 0.04)。此外,丙泊酚-MCT/LCT组的延迟疼痛强度最低(P = 0.01)。丙泊酚-MCT/LCT组、丙泊酚-LCT组和利多卡因与丙泊酚-LCT组中与丙泊酚给药相关的疼痛发生率分别为26.5%、44%和18%。

结论

结果表明脂质类型对减轻延迟疼痛有影响,尤其是丙泊酚-MCT/LCT。另一方面,利多卡因可减轻丙泊酚-LCT引起的即刻血管疼痛。