Suppr超能文献

脂质成分及利多卡因对丙泊酚给药后即刻和延迟注射痛的影响。

Lipid composition and lidocaine effect on immediate and delayed injection pain following propofol administration.

作者信息

Zirak Nahid, Bameshki Alireza, Yazdani Mohammadjavad, Gilani Mehryar Taghavi

机构信息

Cardiac Anesthesia Research Center, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Jan-Apr;10(1):29-32. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.164728.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propofol has been used for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. However, patients experience vascular pain during its injection.

AIMS

The objective of this study was to compare the effect of the lipid type used in propofol preparations and that of lidocaine on the immediate and delayed vascular pain induced by propofol administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this double-blinded clinical study, 150 patients at American Society of Anesthesiologists level I-II were randomly divided into three equally sized groups. A propofol with medium and long-chain triglycerides (propofol-MCT/LCT) was administered to the first group. The second group received propofol containing propofol-LCT, and the third group received propofol-LCT and pretreatment lidocaine 20 mg. The incidence and the intensity of immediate (during injection) and delayed injection pain (after 20 s) were evaluated on a verbal analog scale (1-10) until patients' unconsciousness.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Sample size was calculated with SigmaPlot version 12.5 software. Data were analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16, one-way analysis of variance, and post-hoc Tukey. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The demographic parameters of the three groups were similar. The lidocaine group experienced the least immediate vascular pain. The intensity of pain was highest in the propofol-LCT group (P = 0.04). Additionally, the intensity of delayed pain was lowest in the propofol-MCT/LCT group (P = 0.01). The incidence of pain associated with the propofol administration was 26.5, 44, and 18%, respectively, in propofol-MCT/LCT, propofol-LCT, and lidocaine and propofol-LCT groups.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate an effect of the lipid type on delayed pain reduction, especially propofol-MCT/LCT. On the other hand, the lidocaine decreases immediate propofol-LCT vascular pain.

摘要

背景

丙泊酚已用于麻醉诱导和维持。然而,患者在注射丙泊酚期间会经历血管疼痛。

目的

本研究的目的是比较丙泊酚制剂中使用的脂质类型与利多卡因对丙泊酚给药引起的即刻和延迟血管疼痛的影响。

材料与方法

在这项双盲临床研究中,150名美国麻醉医师协会I-II级患者被随机分为三组,每组人数相等。第一组给予含中长链甘油三酯的丙泊酚(丙泊酚-MCT/LCT)。第二组接受含丙泊酚-LCT的丙泊酚,第三组接受丙泊酚-LCT和20 mg利多卡因预处理。在视觉模拟量表(1-10)上评估即刻(注射期间)和延迟注射疼痛(20秒后)的发生率和强度,直至患者失去意识。

统计分析

使用SigmaPlot 12.5软件计算样本量。数据用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)16版进行分析,采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

三组的人口统计学参数相似。利多卡因组经历的即刻血管疼痛最少。丙泊酚-LCT组的疼痛强度最高(P = 0.04)。此外,丙泊酚-MCT/LCT组的延迟疼痛强度最低(P = 0.01)。丙泊酚-MCT/LCT组、丙泊酚-LCT组和利多卡因与丙泊酚-LCT组中与丙泊酚给药相关的疼痛发生率分别为26.5%、44%和18%。

结论

结果表明脂质类型对减轻延迟疼痛有影响,尤其是丙泊酚-MCT/LCT。另一方面,利多卡因可减轻丙泊酚-LCT引起的即刻血管疼痛。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Discomfort on injection: a comparison between two formulations of propofol.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Nov;23(11):971-4. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506001049. Epub 2006 Jul 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验