Garcia Danilo, Rosenberg Patricia
Blekinge Center for Competence, Blekinge County Council, Karlskrona, Sweden; Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Network for Empowerment and Well-Being, University of Gothenburg, Lyckeby, Sweden; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Blekinge Center for Competence, Blekinge County Council, Karlskrona, Sweden; Network for Empowerment and Well-Being, University of Gothenburg, Lyckeby, Sweden.
PeerJ. 2016 Feb 8;4:e1675. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1675. eCollection 2016.
Background. Research addressing distinctions and similarities between people's malevolent character traits (i.e., the Dark Triad: Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) has detected inconsistent linear associations to temperament traits. Additionally, these dark traits seem to have a common core expressed as uncooperativeness. Hence, some researchers suggest that the dark traits are best represented as one global construct (i.e., the unification argument) rather than as ternary construct (i.e., the uniqueness argument). We put forward the dark cube (cf. Cloninger's character cube) comprising eight dark profiles that can be used to compare individuals who differ in one dark character trait while holding the other two constant. Our aim was to investigate in which circumstances individuals who are high in each one of the dark character traits differ in Cloninger's "light" character traits: self-directedness, cooperativeness, and self-transcendence. We also investigated if people's dark character profiles were associated to their light character profiles. Method. A total of 997 participants recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) responded to the Short Dark Triad and the Short Character Inventory. Participants were allocated to eight different dark profiles and eight light profiles based on their scores in each of the traits and any possible combination of high and low scores. We used three-way interaction regression analyses and t-tests to investigate differences in light character traits between individuals with different dark profiles. As a second step, we compared the individuals' dark profile with her/his character profile using an exact cell-wise analysis conducted in the ROPstat software (http://www.ropstat.com). Results. Individuals who expressed high levels of Machiavellianism and those who expressed high levels of psychopathy also expressed low self-directedness and low cooperativeness. Individuals with high levels of narcissism, in contrast, scored high in self-directedness. Moreover, individuals with a profile low in the dark traits were more likely to end up with a profile high in cooperativeness. The opposite was true for those individuals with a profile high in the dark traits. The rest of the cross-comparisons revealed some of the characteristics of human personality as a non-linear complex dynamic system. Conclusions. Our study suggests that individuals who are high in Machiavellianism and psychopathy share a unified non-agentic and uncooperative character (i.e., irresponsible, low in self-control, unempathetic, unhelpful, untolerant), while individuals high in narcissism have a more unique character configuration expressed as high agency and, when the other dark traits are high, highly spiritual but uncooperative. In other words, based on differences in their associations to the light side of character, the Dark Triad seems to be a dyad rather than a triad.
背景。针对人们恶意性格特质(即黑暗三性格:马基雅维利主义、自恋和精神病态)之间的异同进行的研究,已发现其与气质特质之间存在不一致的线性关联。此外,这些黑暗特质似乎有一个共同的核心,表现为不合作。因此,一些研究人员认为,黑暗特质最好被表示为一个整体结构(即统一论点),而不是三元结构(即独特性论点)。我们提出了黑暗立方体(参照克隆宁格的性格立方体),它包含八个黑暗剖面,可用于比较在一种黑暗性格特质上不同而其他两种保持不变的个体。我们的目的是调查在何种情况下,具有每种黑暗性格特质的个体在克隆宁格的“光明”性格特质(自我导向、合作性和自我超越)方面存在差异。我们还研究了人们的黑暗性格剖面是否与其光明性格剖面相关。方法。从亚马逊的土耳其机器人(MTurk)招募的997名参与者对简短黑暗三性格量表和简短性格量表进行了回答。根据参与者在每种特质上的得分以及高低分的任何可能组合,将他们分配到八个不同的黑暗剖面和八个光明剖面。我们使用三向交互回归分析和t检验来调查不同黑暗剖面个体在光明性格特质上的差异。第二步,我们使用ROPstat软件(http://www.ropstat.com)进行的精确逐单元格分析,将个体的黑暗剖面与其性格剖面进行比较。结果。表现出高马基雅维利主义的个体和表现出高精神病态的个体也表现出低自我导向和低合作性。相比之下,高自恋的个体在自我导向上得分较高。此外,黑暗特质得分低的个体更有可能最终获得高合作性的剖面。黑暗特质得分高的个体则相反。其余的交叉比较揭示了作为非线性复杂动态系统的人类个性的一些特征。结论。我们的研究表明,高马基雅维利主义和高精神病态的个体具有统一的非能动性和不合作性格(即不负责任、自我控制能力低、缺乏同理心、不乐于助人、不容忍),而高自恋的个体具有更独特的性格配置,表现为高能动性以及当其他黑暗特质较高时,具有高度精神性但不合作。换句话说,基于它们与性格光明面关联的差异,黑暗三性格似乎是二元而非三元的。