Parmar Malik M, Sachdeva K S, Rade Kiran, Ghedia Mayank, Bansal Avi, Nagaraja Sharath Burugina, Willis Matthew D, Misquitta Dyson P, Nair Sreenivas A, Moonan Patrick K, Dewan Puneet K
National Professional Officer - Drug Resistant TB, World Health Organization - Country Office for India, New Delhi, India.
Central TB Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Tuberc. 2015 Oct;62(4):211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2015.11.006. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
Tuberculosis transmission in health care settings represents a major public health problem. In 2010, national airborne infection control (AIC) guidelines were adopted in India. These guidelines included specific policies for TB prevention and control in health care settings. However, the feasibility and effectiveness of these guidelines have not been assessed in routine practice. This study aimed to conduct baseline assessments of AIC policies and practices within a convenience sample of 35 health care settings across 3 states in India and to assess the level of implementation at each facility after one year.
A multi-agency, multidisciplinary panel of experts performed site visits using a standardized risk assessment tool to document current practices and review resource capacity. At the conclusion of each assessment, facility-specific recommendations were provided to improve AIC performance to align with national guidelines.
Upon initial assessment, AIC systems were found to be poorly developed and implemented. Administrative controls were not commonly practiced and many departments needed renovation to achieve minimum environmental standards. One year after the baseline assessments, there were substantial improvements in both policy and practice.
A package of capacity building and systems development that followed national guidelines substantially improved implementation of AIC policies and practice.
医疗机构内的结核病传播是一个重大的公共卫生问题。2010年,印度采用了国家空气传播感染控制(AIC)指南。这些指南包括医疗机构中结核病预防和控制的具体政策。然而,这些指南在常规实践中的可行性和有效性尚未得到评估。本研究旨在对印度3个邦的35个医疗机构的便利样本中的AIC政策和实践进行基线评估,并在一年后评估每个机构的实施水平。
一个多机构、多学科的专家小组使用标准化风险评估工具进行实地考察,以记录当前实践并审查资源能力。在每次评估结束时,提供针对特定机构的建议,以改善AIC绩效,使其符合国家指南。
初步评估发现,AIC系统的开发和实施情况不佳。行政控制措施未普遍实施,许多部门需要翻新以达到最低环境标准。基线评估一年后,政策和实践都有了显著改善。
遵循国家指南的一揽子能力建设和系统开发措施显著改善了AIC政策和实践的实施情况。