von Linstow Roloff Eva, Muller Robert U, Brown Malcolm W
School of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York. In memoriam, Robert U. Muller (1942-2013).
Hippocampus. 2016 Aug;26(8):1021-32. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22584. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
There is much evidence that the perirhinal cortex of both rats and monkeys is important for judging the relative familiarity of visual stimuli. In monkeys many studies have found that a proportion of perirhinal neurons respond more to novel than familiar stimuli. There are fewer studies of perirhinal neuronal responses in rats, and those studies based on exploration of objects, have raised into question the encoding of stimulus familiarity by rat perirhinal neurons. For this reason, recordings of single neuronal activity were made from the perirhinal cortex of rats so as to compare responsiveness to novel and familiar stimuli in two different behavioral situations. The first situation was based upon that used in "paired viewing" experiments that have established rat perirhinal differences in immediate early gene expression for novel and familiar visual stimuli displayed on computer monitors. The second situation was similar to that used in the spontaneous object recognition test that has been widely used to establish the involvement of rat perirhinal cortex in familiarity discrimination. In the first condition 30 (25%) of 120 perirhinal neurons were visually responsive; of these responsive neurons 19 (63%) responded significantly differently to novel and familiar stimuli. In the second condition eight (53%) of 15 perirhinal neurons changed activity significantly in the vicinity of objects (had "object fields"); however, for none (0%) of these was there a significant activity change related to the familiarity of an object, an incidence significantly lower than for the first condition. Possible reasons for the difference are discussed. It is argued that the failure to find recognition-related neuronal responses while exploring objects is related to its detectability by the measures used, rather than the absence of all such signals in perirhinal cortex. Indeed, as shown by the results, such signals are found when a different methodology is used. © 2016 The Authors Hippocampus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
有大量证据表明,大鼠和猴子的嗅周皮质对于判断视觉刺激的相对熟悉程度很重要。在猴子身上,许多研究发现,一部分嗅周神经元对新异刺激的反应比对熟悉刺激的反应更强烈。对大鼠嗅周神经元反应的研究较少,而那些基于物体探索的研究,对大鼠嗅周神经元对刺激熟悉程度的编码提出了质疑。因此,对大鼠嗅周皮质进行了单神经元活动记录,以便比较在两种不同行为情境下对新异刺激和熟悉刺激的反应性。第一种情境基于“配对观察”实验中使用的情境,该实验已确定了大鼠嗅周皮质对计算机显示器上显示的新异和熟悉视觉刺激的即刻早期基因表达存在差异。第二种情境类似于自发物体识别测试中使用的情境,该测试已被广泛用于确定大鼠嗅周皮质在熟悉度辨别中的作用。在第一种条件下,120个嗅周神经元中有30个(25%)对视觉有反应;在这些有反应的神经元中,19个(63%)对新异刺激和熟悉刺激的反应有显著差异。在第二种条件下,15个嗅周神经元中有8个(53%)在物体附近活动有显著变化(有“物体场”);然而,这些神经元中没有一个(0%)的活动变化与物体的熟悉程度有显著关系,这一发生率明显低于第一种条件。文中讨论了造成这种差异的可能原因。有人认为,在探索物体时未能发现与识别相关的神经元反应,与其所采用测量方法的可检测性有关,而非嗅周皮质中不存在所有此类信号。事实上,正如结果所示,当使用不同方法时就能发现此类信号。© 2016作者 海马体 由威利期刊公司出版