Ostrofsky Calli, Seedat Jaishika
Department of Speech and Hearing Therapy, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa.
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2016 Feb 16;63(1):117. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v63i1.117.
Notwithstanding its value, there are challenges and limitations to implementing a dysphagia screening tool from a developed contexts in a developing context. The need for a reliable and valid screening tool for dysphagia that considers context, systemic rules and resources was identified to prevent further medical compromise, optimise dysphagia prognosis and ultimately hasten patients' return to home or work.
To establish the validity and reliability of the South African dysphagia screening tool (SADS) for acute stroke patients accessing government hospital services. The study was a quantitative, non-experimental, correlational cross-sectional design with a retrospective component. Convenient sampling was used to recruit 18 speech-language therapists and 63 acute stroke patients from three South African government hospitals. The SADS consists of 20 test items and was administered by speech-language therapists. Screening was followed by a diagnostic dysphagia assessment. The administrator of the tool was not involved in completing the diagnostic assessment, to eliminate bias and prevent contamination of results from screener to diagnostic assessment. Sensitivity, validity and efficacy of the screening tool were evaluated against the results of the diagnostic dysphagia assessment. Cohen's kappa measures determined inter-rater agreement between the results of the SADS and the diagnostic assessment.
The SADS was proven to be valid and reliable. Cohen's kappa indicated a high inter-rater reliability and showed high sensitivity and adequate specificity in detecting dysphagia amongst acute stroke patients who were at risk for dysphagia. The SADS was characterised by concurrent, content and face validity. As a first step in establishing contextual appropriateness, the SADS is a valid and reliable screening tool that is sensitive in identifying stroke patients at risk for dysphagia within government hospitals in South Africa.
尽管吞咽困难筛查工具具有价值,但在发展中环境中实施来自发达环境的吞咽困难筛查工具存在挑战和局限性。人们认识到需要一种可靠且有效的吞咽困难筛查工具,该工具要考虑到环境、系统规则和资源,以防止进一步的医疗损害,优化吞咽困难的预后,并最终加速患者回家或重返工作岗位。
为确定南非吞咽困难筛查工具(SADS)对使用政府医院服务的急性中风患者的有效性和可靠性。该研究采用定量、非实验性、相关性横断面设计,并带有回顾性成分。采用便利抽样法从南非三家政府医院招募了18名言语治疗师和63名急性中风患者。SADS由20个测试项目组成,由言语治疗师进行管理。筛查之后进行吞咽困难诊断评估。该工具的管理人员不参与完成诊断评估,以消除偏差并防止筛查结果对诊断评估结果的污染。根据吞咽困难诊断评估结果评估筛查工具的敏感性、有效性和效能。科恩kappa系数用于确定SADS结果与诊断评估结果之间的评分者间一致性。
SADS被证明是有效且可靠的。科恩kappa系数表明评分者间可靠性高,并且在检测有吞咽困难风险的急性中风患者的吞咽困难方面显示出高敏感性和足够的特异性。SADS具有同时效度、内容效度和表面效度。作为确立环境适宜性的第一步,SADS是一种有效且可靠的筛查工具,在识别南非政府医院中有吞咽困难风险的中风患者方面很敏感。