• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Organizational strategies for promoting patient and provider uptake of personal health records.促进患者和医疗服务提供者采用个人健康记录的组织策略。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):213-22. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003055. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
2
Personal health records for patients with chronic disease: a major opportunity.慢性病患者的个人健康记录:一个重大机遇。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Apr 23;5(2):416-29. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-01-RA-0002. eCollection 2014.
3
Policies for patient access to clinical data via PHRs: current state and recommendations.通过 PHR 实现患者获取临床数据的政策:现状与建议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000400. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
4
Valuing Citizen Access to Digital Health Services: Applied Value-Based Outcomes in the Canadian Context and Tools for Modernizing Health Systems.重视公民对数字健康服务的获取:加拿大背景下基于价值的应用成果及卫生系统现代化工具
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 6;21(6):e12277. doi: 10.2196/12277.
5
The personal health record paradox: health care professionals' perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings.个人健康记录悖论:医疗保健专业人员的观点以及组织和临床环境中个人健康记录系统的信息生态
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 4;15(4):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2443.
6
Personal Health Record Use in the United States: Forecasting Future Adoption Levels.美国个人健康记录的使用情况:预测未来的采用水平。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 30;18(3):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4973.
7
Patient and provider perspectives of personal health record use: a multisite qualitative study in HIV care settings.患者和医疗服务提供者对个人健康记录使用的看法:一项在 HIV 护理环境中的多地点定性研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Jul 1;13(7):475-485. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac118.
8
Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care.初级保健中绑定式个人健康记录的传播与应用
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Apr 1;12(Spring):1c. eCollection 2015.
9
If we offer it, will they accept? Factors affecting patient use intentions of personal health records and secure messaging.如果我们提供它,他们会接受吗?影响患者对个人健康记录和安全消息传递使用意愿的因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 26;15(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2243.
10
Influencing factors for adopting personal health record (PHR).采用个人健康记录(PHR)的影响因素。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;178:39-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Personal Health Record (PHR) Experience and Recommendations for a Transformation in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯个人健康记录(PHR)的经验及转型建议
J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 19;13(8):1275. doi: 10.3390/jpm13081275.
2
The role of organizational culture in health information technology implementations: A scoping review.组织文化在健康信息技术实施中的作用:一项范围综述。
Learn Health Syst. 2021 Dec 11;6(3):e10299. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10299. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Shared Access to Patient Portals for Older Adults: Implications for Privacy and Digital Health Equity.老年人共享患者门户:对隐私和数字健康公平性的影响。
JMIR Aging. 2022 May 4;5(2):e34628. doi: 10.2196/34628.
4
Implementation approaches and barriers for rule-based and machine learning-based sepsis risk prediction tools: a qualitative study.基于规则和基于机器学习的脓毒症风险预测工具的实施方法与障碍:一项定性研究
JAMIA Open. 2022 Apr 18;5(2):ooac022. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac022. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Factors of quality of care and their association with smartphone based PHR adoption in South Korean hospitals.医疗照护质量因素及其与韩国医院采用基于智能手机的个人健康记录的关联。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01666-9.
6
Factors Influencing Development and Implementation of Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records-A Comparative Study of Sweden and the Netherlands.影响患者获取电子健康记录的发展与实施的因素——瑞典与荷兰的比较研究
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 8;9:621210. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.621210. eCollection 2021.
7
Stagewise Overview of Issues Influencing Organizational Technology Adoption and Use.影响组织技术采用与使用的问题的分阶段概述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 17;12:630145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630145. eCollection 2021.
8
Barriers to patient, provider, and caregiver adoption and use of electronic personal health records in chronic care: a systematic review.慢性病患者、医护人员和照护者采用和使用电子个人健康记录的障碍:系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01159-1.
9
Effects of a Web-Based Patient Portal on Patient Satisfaction and Missed Appointment Rates: Survey Study.基于网络的患者门户对患者满意度和失约率的影响:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 19;22(5):e17955. doi: 10.2196/17955.
10
Pediatric patient portal use in one health system.儿科患者在一个医疗体系中的患者门户使用情况。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):444-448. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz203.

本文引用的文献

1
Personal health records for patients with chronic disease: a major opportunity.慢性病患者的个人健康记录:一个重大机遇。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Apr 23;5(2):416-29. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-01-RA-0002. eCollection 2014.
2
How outcomes are achieved through patient portals: a realist review.患者门户实现结果的途径:一个实际主义综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):751-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002501. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
3
A comparison of English and French approaches to providing patients access to Summary Care Records: scope, consent, cost.英国和法国为患者提供摘要护理记录的方法比较:范围、同意和成本
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;186:61-5.
4
The implications of e-health system delivery strategies for integrated healthcare: lessons from England.电子健康系统提供策略对整合医疗保健的影响:来自英国的经验教训。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):e96-e106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
5
The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials.电子患者门户对患者护理的影响:对照试验的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 26;14(6):e162. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2238.
6
Association of online patient access to clinicians and medical records with use of clinical services.患者在线获取临床医生和病历信息与临床服务使用的关联。
JAMA. 2012 Nov 21;308(19):2012-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.14126.
7
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead.邀请患者阅读医生的记录:一项准实验研究及前瞻性观察。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 2;157(7):461-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002.
8
Modeling factors that influence personal health records adoption.影响个人健康记录采用的建模因素。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2012 Jul;30(7):354-62. doi: 10.1097/NXN.0b013e3182510717.
9
Personal health records: a scoping review.个人健康记录:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):515-22. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000105.
10
Use of an electronic patient portal among disadvantaged populations.利用电子病人门户服务于弱势群体。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct;26(10):1117-23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1749-y. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

促进患者和医疗服务提供者采用个人健康记录的组织策略。

Organizational strategies for promoting patient and provider uptake of personal health records.

作者信息

Wells Susan, Rozenblum Ronen, Park Andrea, Dunn Marie, Bates David W

机构信息

Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Department of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Health Care Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):213-22. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003055. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003055
PMID:25326601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4433381/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate organizational strategies to promote personal health records (PHRs) adoption with a focus on patients with chronic disease.

METHODS

Using semi-structured interviews and a web-based survey, we sampled US health delivery organizations which had implemented PHRs for at least 12 months, were recognized as PHR innovators, and had scored highly in national patient satisfaction surveys. Respondents had lead positions for clinical information systems or high-risk population management. Using grounded theory approach, thematic categories were derived from interviews and coupled with data from the survey.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with 30 informants from 16 identified organizations. Organizational strategies were directed towards raising patient awareness via multimedia communications, and provider acceptance and uptake. Strategies for providers were grouped into six main themes: organizational vision, governance and policies, work process redesign, staff training, information technology (IT) support, and monitoring and incentives. Successful organizations actively communicated their vision, engaged leaders at all levels, had clear governance, planning, and protocols, set targets, and celebrated achievement. The most effective strategy for patient uptake was through health professional encouragement. No specific outreach efforts targeted patients with chronic disease. Registration and PHR activity was routinely measured but without reference to a denominator population or high risk subpopulations.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Successful PHR implementation represents a social change and operational project catalyzed by a technical solution. The key to clinician acceptance is making their work easier. However, organizations will likely not achieve the value they want from PHRs unless they target specific populations and monitor their uptake.

摘要

目的

调查促进个人健康记录(PHR)采用的组织策略,重点关注慢性病患者。

方法

通过半结构化访谈和基于网络的调查,我们对美国的医疗服务组织进行了抽样,这些组织已实施PHR至少12个月,被公认为PHR创新者,且在全国患者满意度调查中得分很高。受访者担任临床信息系统或高危人群管理的领导职位。采用扎根理论方法,从访谈中得出主题类别,并与调查数据相结合。

结果

对来自16个已识别组织的30名受访者进行了访谈。组织策略旨在通过多媒体通信提高患者意识,以及促进提供者的接受和采用。针对提供者的策略分为六个主要主题:组织愿景、治理与政策、工作流程重新设计、员工培训、信息技术(IT)支持以及监测与激励。成功的组织积极传达其愿景,让各级领导参与其中,拥有明确的治理、规划和协议,设定目标并庆祝成就。促进患者采用的最有效策略是通过健康专业人员的鼓励。没有针对慢性病患者的具体推广努力。对注册和PHR活动进行了常规测量,但未参考分母人群或高危亚人群。

讨论与结论

成功实施PHR代表着由技术解决方案催化的社会变革和运营项目。临床医生接受的关键是使他们的工作更轻松。然而,除非组织针对特定人群并监测其采用情况,否则可能无法从PHR中获得他们想要的价值。