Benyakorn Songpoom, Riley Steven J, Calub Catrina A, Schweitzer Julie B
1 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University , Ongkharak, Nakhonnayok, Thailand .
2 Department of Psychiatry, University of California , Davis, Sacramento, California.
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Sep;22(9):761-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0169. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
Care (i.e., evaluation and intervention) delivered through technology is used in many areas of mental health services, including for persons with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Technology can facilitate care for individuals with ADHD, their parents, and their care providers. The adoption of technological tools for ADHD care requires evidence-based studies to support the transition from development to integration into use in the home, school, or work for persons with the disorder. The initial phase, which is development of technological tools, has begun in earnest; however, the evidence base for many of these tools is lacking. In some instances, the uptake of a piece of technology into home use or clinical practice may be further along than the research to support its use.
In this study, we review the current evidence regarding technology for ADHD and also propose a model to evaluate the support for other tools that have yet to be tested.
We propose using the Research Domain Criteria as a framework for evaluating the tools' relationships to dimensions related to ADHD.
This article concludes with recommendations for testing new tools that may have promise in improving the evaluation or treatment of persons with ADHD.
通过技术提供的护理(即评估和干预)在心理健康服务的许多领域都有应用,包括对患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的人群。技术可以促进对ADHD患者、他们的父母以及他们的护理提供者的护理。采用用于ADHD护理的技术工具需要基于证据的研究,以支持从开发到整合到该疾病患者的家庭、学校或工作场所使用的过渡。初始阶段,即技术工具的开发,已经认真展开;然而,许多这些工具的证据基础尚缺。在某些情况下,一项技术被家庭使用或临床实践采用的程度可能比支持其使用的研究更为超前。
在本研究中,我们回顾了关于ADHD技术的当前证据,并提出了一个模型来评估对其他尚未测试的工具的支持情况。
我们建议使用研究领域标准作为评估工具与ADHD相关维度关系的框架。
本文最后给出了关于测试可能有望改善ADHD患者评估或治疗的新工具的建议。