• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从三级数据层次角度看阶梯楔形临床试验的样本量确定

Sample size determinations for stepped-wedge clinical trials from a three-level data hierarchy perspective.

作者信息

Heo Moonseong, Kim Namhee, Rinke Michael L, Wylie-Rosett Judith

机构信息

1 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

2 Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):480-489. doi: 10.1177/0962280216632564. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1177/0962280216632564
PMID:26988927
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5026912/
Abstract

Stepped-wedge (SW) designs have been steadily implemented in a variety of trials. A SW design typically assumes a three-level hierarchical data structure where participants are nested within times or periods which are in turn nested within clusters. Therefore, statistical models for analysis of SW trial data need to consider two correlations, the first and second level correlations. Existing power functions and sample size determination formulas had been derived based on statistical models for two-level data structures. Consequently, the second-level correlation has not been incorporated in conventional power analyses. In this paper, we derived a closed-form explicit power function based on a statistical model for three-level continuous outcome data. The power function is based on a pooled overall estimate of stratified cluster-specific estimates of an intervention effect. The sampling distribution of the pooled estimate is derived by applying a fixed-effect meta-analytic approach. Simulation studies verified that the derived power function is unbiased and can be applicable to varying number of participants per period per cluster. In addition, when data structures are assumed to have two levels, we compare three types of power functions by conducting additional simulation studies under a two-level statistical model. In this case, the power function based on a sampling distribution of a marginal, as opposed to pooled, estimate of the intervention effect performed the best. Extensions of power functions to binary outcomes are also suggested.

摘要

阶梯楔形(SW)设计已在各种试验中稳步实施。SW设计通常假定为三级分层数据结构,其中参与者嵌套在时间或时期内,而时间或时期又嵌套在群组中。因此,用于分析SW试验数据的统计模型需要考虑两种相关性,即一级相关性和二级相关性。现有的功效函数和样本量确定公式是基于二级数据结构的统计模型推导出来的。因此,二级相关性未纳入传统的功效分析中。在本文中,我们基于三级连续结局数据的统计模型推导了一个封闭形式的显式功效函数。该功效函数基于干预效应的分层群组特定估计的合并总体估计。合并估计的抽样分布是通过应用固定效应荟萃分析方法推导出来的。模拟研究验证了所推导的功效函数是无偏的,并且可适用于每个群组每个时期不同数量的参与者。此外,当假设数据结构为两级时,我们在两级统计模型下通过进行额外的模拟研究来比较三种类型的功效函数。在这种情况下,基于干预效应的边际估计(而非合并估计)的抽样分布的功效函数表现最佳。还提出了将功效函数扩展到二元结局的方法。

相似文献

1
Sample size determinations for stepped-wedge clinical trials from a three-level data hierarchy perspective.从三级数据层次角度看阶梯楔形临床试验的样本量确定
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):480-489. doi: 10.1177/0962280216632564. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
2
swdpwr: A SAS macro and an R package for power calculations in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.swdpwr:用于阶梯楔形整群随机试验功效计算的SAS宏和R包。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Jan;213:106522. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106522. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
3
Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study.具有二元结局的横断面阶梯楔形整群随机试验的最小聚类数及分析方法比较:一项模拟研究
Trials. 2017 Mar 9;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1862-2.
4
The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.不同聚类大小对横向阶段-推移群组随机试验的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0760-6.
5
An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.在具有连续结局的横断面、阶梯式整群随机试验中,整群大小的不平衡不会导致显著的效能损失。
Trials. 2017 Mar 7;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1832-8.
6
Sample size determination for three-level randomized clinical trials with randomization at the first or second level.一级或二级随机化的三级随机临床试验的样本量确定
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(3):579-99. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.888436.
7
Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial.阶梯楔形试验的样本量计算
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:354. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0840-9.
8
Sample size calculation for stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with more than two levels of clustering.两水平以上整群随机试验的样本量计算。
Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):225-236. doi: 10.1177/1740774519829053. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
9
Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial.在进行阶梯楔形试验之前需要考虑的五个问题。
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:350. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0841-8.
10
The optimal design of stepped wedge trials with equal allocation to sequences and a comparison to other trial designs.序列均等分配的阶梯楔形试验的优化设计及其与其他试验设计的比较。
Clin Trials. 2017 Dec;14(6):639-647. doi: 10.1177/1740774517723921. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A general method for calculating power for GEE analysis of complete and incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.一种用于计算完全和不完全阶段式群组随机试验的 GEE 分析的功效的通用方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Jan;32(1):71-87. doi: 10.1177/09622802221129861. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
2
Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.混合效应模型在阶梯式楔形群随机临床试验设计和分析中的应用概述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):612-639. doi: 10.1177/0962280220932962. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
Testing the leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI) intervention in Norwegian mental health clinics: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized design study protocol.测试领导力和组织变革实施(LOCI)干预在挪威精神卫生诊所的效果:一项基于阶梯式楔形集群随机设计的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 13;14(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0873-7.
4
Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples.对采用重复横断面样本的整群随机阶梯楔形试验的分析。
Trials. 2017 Mar 4;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1833-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial.阶梯楔形试验的样本量计算
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:354. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0840-9.
2
Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial.在进行阶梯楔形试验之前需要考虑的五个问题。
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:350. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0841-8.
3
Stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2014.阶梯楔形随机对照试验:对2010年至2014年间发表的研究的系统评价
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:353. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0839-2.
4
Analysis and reporting of stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: synthesis and critical appraisal of published studies, 2010 to 2014.阶梯楔形随机对照试验的分析与报告:2010年至2014年已发表研究的综合与批判性评价
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:358. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0838-3.
5
Logistic, ethical, and political dimensions of stepped wedge trials: critical review and case studies.阶梯楔形试验的逻辑、伦理和政治维度:批判性综述与案例研究
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:351. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0837-4.
6
A stepped wedge design for testing an effect of intranasal insulin on cognitive development of children with Phelan-McDermid syndrome: A comparison of different designs.一项用于测试鼻内胰岛素对费兰-麦克德米德综合征患儿认知发育影响的阶梯楔形设计:不同设计的比较。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Apr;26(2):766-775. doi: 10.1177/0962280214558864. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
7
Sample size determination for three-level randomized clinical trials with randomization at the first or second level.一级或二级随机化的三级随机临床试验的样本量确定
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(3):579-99. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.888436.
8
Strengths and weaknesses of a stepped wedge cluster randomized design: its application in a colorectal cancer follow-up study.优势和劣势的一个阶梯式楔形群随机设计:其在结直肠癌随访研究中的应用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):454-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.018. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
9
The efficiency of stepped wedge vs. cluster randomized trials: stepped wedge studies do not always require a smaller sample size.阶梯楔形试验与整群随机试验的效率:阶梯楔形研究并不总是需要更小的样本量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;66(12):1427-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
10
Effect of improved tuberculosis screening and isoniazid preventive therapy on incidence of tuberculosis and death in patients with HIV in clinics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial.改善结核筛查和异烟肼预防治疗对巴西里约热内卢诊所中 HIV 感染者结核病发病率和死亡率的影响:一项 stepped wedge, cluster-randomised 试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Oct;13(10):852-8. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70187-7. Epub 2013 Aug 16.