Tang Karen L, Rashid Ruksana, Godley Jenny, Ghali William A
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 18;6(3):e010137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010137.
To determine the association between subjective social status (SSS), or the individual's perception of his or her position in the social hierarchy, and the odds of coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, diabetes, obesity and dyslipidaemia.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, Web of Science and reference lists of all included studies up to October 2014, with a verification search in July 2015. Inclusion criteria were original studies in adults that reported odds, risk or hazard ratios of at least one outcome of interest (CAD, hypertension, diabetes, obesity or dyslipidaemia), comparing 'lower' versus 'higher' SSS groups, where SSS is measured on a self-anchoring ladder. ORs were pooled using a random-effects model.
10 studies were included in the systematic review; 9 of these were included in the meta-analysis. In analyses unadjusted for objective socioeconomic status (SES) measures such as income, education or occupation, the pooled OR comparing the bottom versus the top of the SSS ladder was 1.82 (95% CI 1.10 to 2.99) for CAD, 1.88 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.79) for hypertension, 1.90 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.87) for diabetes, 3.68 (95% CI 2.03 to 6.64) for dyslipidaemia and 1.57 (95% CI 0.95 to 2.59) for obesity. These associations were attenuated when adjusting for objective SES measures, with the only statistically significant association remaining for dyslipidaemia (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.06), though all ORs remained greater than 1.
Lower SSS is associated with significantly increased odds of CAD, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia, with a trend towards increased odds of obesity. These trends are consistently present, though the effects attenuated when adjusting for SES, suggesting that perception of one's own status on a social hierarchy has health effects above and beyond one's actual income, occupation and education.
确定主观社会地位(SSS),即个体对自己在社会等级制度中地位的认知,与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)、高血压、糖尿病、肥胖症和血脂异常的患病几率之间的关联。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们检索了截至2014年10月的PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、SocINDEX、Web of Science以及所有纳入研究的参考文献列表,并于2015年7月进行了验证性检索。纳入标准为针对成年人的原始研究,这些研究报告了至少一种感兴趣结局(CAD、高血压、糖尿病、肥胖症或血脂异常)的比值比、风险比或风险率,比较了“较低”与“较高”SSS组,其中SSS通过自我定位阶梯进行测量。使用随机效应模型汇总比值比。
系统评价纳入了10项研究;其中9项纳入了荟萃分析。在未对收入、教育或职业等客观社会经济地位(SES)指标进行调整的分析中,比较SSS阶梯底部与顶部时,CAD的汇总比值比为1.82(95%置信区间1.10至2.99),高血压为1.88(95%置信区间1.27至2.79),糖尿病为1.90(95%置信区间1.25至2.87),血脂异常为3.68(95%置信区间2.03至6.64),肥胖症为1.57(95%置信区间0.95至2.59)。在对客观SES指标进行调整后,这些关联减弱,仅血脂异常的关联仍具有统计学意义(比值比2.10,95%置信区间1.09至4.06),不过所有比值比仍大于1。
较低的SSS与CAD、高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常的患病几率显著增加相关,肥胖症的患病几率有增加趋势。这些趋势始终存在,尽管在对SES进行调整后效应减弱,这表明个体对自己在社会等级中的地位认知对健康的影响超出了其实际收入、职业和教育水平。