Springmann Marco, Godfray H Charles J, Rayner Mike, Scarborough Peter
Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom; British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for Non-Communicable Disease Prevention, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom;
Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom; Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 12;113(15):4146-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523119113. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
What we eat greatly influences our personal health and the environment we all share. Recent analyses have highlighted the likely dual health and environmental benefits of reducing the fraction of animal-sourced foods in our diets. Here, we couple for the first time, to our knowledge, a region-specific global health model based on dietary and weight-related risk factors with emissions accounting and economic valuation modules to quantify the linked health and environmental consequences of dietary changes. We find that the impacts of dietary changes toward less meat and more plant-based diets vary greatly among regions. The largest absolute environmental and health benefits result from diet shifts in developing countries whereas Western high-income and middle-income countries gain most in per capita terms. Transitioning toward more plant-based diets that are in line with standard dietary guidelines could reduce global mortality by 6-10% and food-related greenhouse gas emissions by 29-70% compared with a reference scenario in 2050. We find that the monetized value of the improvements in health would be comparable with, or exceed, the value of the environmental benefits although the exact valuation method used considerably affects the estimated amounts. Overall, we estimate the economic benefits of improving diets to be 1-31 trillion US dollars, which is equivalent to 0.4-13% of global gross domestic product (GDP) in 2050. However, significant changes in the global food system would be necessary for regional diets to match the dietary patterns studied here.
我们的饮食对个人健康以及我们共同生活的环境有着重大影响。近期分析强调了减少饮食中动物源性食物比例可能给健康和环境带来的双重益处。在此,据我们所知,我们首次将基于饮食和体重相关风险因素的特定区域全球健康模型与排放核算及经济估值模块相结合,以量化饮食变化所带来的相关健康和环境后果。我们发现,向少吃肉类、多吃植物性饮食的转变在不同地区产生的影响差异巨大。发展中国家的饮食转变带来的绝对环境和健康效益最大,而西方高收入和中等收入国家在人均方面受益最多。与2050年的参考情景相比,转向符合标准饮食指南的更多植物性饮食可使全球死亡率降低6% - 10%,与食物相关的温室气体排放量降低29% - 70%。我们发现,健康改善的货币化价值将与环境效益价值相当或超过环境效益价值,尽管所使用的具体估值方法对估计金额有很大影响。总体而言,我们估计改善饮食的经济效益为1万亿至31万亿美元,这相当于2050年全球国内生产总值(GDP)的0.4% - 13%。然而,要使区域饮食与本文所研究的饮食模式相匹配,全球粮食系统需发生重大变化。