Sescousse Guillaume, Janssen Lieneke K, Hashemi Mahur M, Timmer Monique H M, Geurts Dirk E M, Ter Huurne Niels P, Clark Luke, Cools Roshan
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Sep;41(10):2614-23. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.43. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
Near-misses in gambling games are losing events that come close to a win. Near-misses were previously shown to recruit reward-related brain regions including the ventral striatum, and to invigorate gambling behavior, supposedly by fostering an illusion of control. Given that pathological gamblers are particularly vulnerable to such cognitive illusions, their persistent gambling behavior might result from an amplified striatal sensitivity to near-misses. In addition, animal studies have shown that behavioral responses to near-miss-like events are sensitive to dopamine, but this dopaminergic influence has not been tested in humans. To investigate these hypotheses, we recruited 22 pathological gamblers and 22 healthy controls who played a slot machine task delivering wins, near-misses and full-misses, inside an fMRI scanner. Each participant played the task twice, once under placebo and once under a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist (sulpiride 400 mg), in a double-blind, counter-balanced design. Participants were asked about their motivation to continue gambling throughout the task. Across all participants, near-misses elicited higher motivation to continue gambling and increased striatal responses compared with full-misses. Crucially, pathological gamblers showed amplified striatal responses to near-misses compared with controls. These group differences were not observed following win outcomes. In contrast to our hypothesis, sulpiride did not induce any reliable modulation of brain responses to near-misses. Together, our results demonstrate that pathological gamblers have amplified brain responses to near-misses, which likely contribute to their persistent gambling behavior. However, there is no evidence that these responses are influenced by dopamine. These results have implications for treatment and gambling regulation.
赌博游戏中的“差点赢”是指接近获胜的失败结果。此前研究表明,“差点赢”会激活包括腹侧纹状体在内的与奖励相关的脑区,并激发赌博行为,可能是通过营造一种控制错觉来实现的。鉴于病态赌徒特别容易受到这种认知错觉的影响,他们持续的赌博行为可能源于纹状体对“差点赢”的敏感性增强。此外,动物研究表明,对类似“差点赢”事件的行为反应对多巴胺敏感,但这种多巴胺能影响尚未在人类中得到验证。为了探究这些假设,我们招募了22名病态赌徒和22名健康对照者,让他们在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)扫描仪内玩一款老虎机游戏,该游戏会产生赢、“差点赢”和完全输三种结果。每位参与者玩两次这个游戏,一次在服用安慰剂的情况下,一次在服用多巴胺D2受体拮抗剂(舒必利400毫克)的情况下,采用双盲、平衡设计。在整个任务过程中,会询问参与者继续赌博的动机。在所有参与者中,与完全输相比,“差点赢”引发了更高的继续赌博的动机,并增强了纹状体的反应。至关重要的是,与对照组相比,病态赌徒对“差点赢”的纹状体反应增强。在赢的结果之后未观察到这些组间差异。与我们的假设相反,舒必利并未对大脑对“差点赢”的反应产生任何可靠的调节作用。总之,我们的结果表明,病态赌徒对“差点赢”的大脑反应增强,这可能导致了他们持续的赌博行为。然而,没有证据表明这些反应受多巴胺影响。这些结果对治疗和赌博监管具有启示意义。