Cash Leigh J, Hoover Mark D, Guilmette Raymond A, Breysse Patrick N, Bertelli Luiz
Los Alamos National Laboratory, PO Box 1663, MS T086, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Respiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1095 Willowdale Road Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017 Apr 15;173(4):318-324. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw039.
Specific absorption parameters for 239PuO2 and 238PuO2 have been determined based on available biokinetic data from studies in rodents, and the impacts of these parameters on bioassay interpretation and dosimetry after inhalation of nanoPuO2 materials have been evaluated. Calculations of activities after an acute intake of nanoparticles of 239PuO2 and 238PuO2 are compared with the corresponding calculations using standard default absorption parameters using the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 66 respiratory tract model. Committed effective doses are also evaluated and compared. In this case, it was found that interpretation of bioassay measurements with the assumption that the biokinetic behaviour of PuO2 nanoparticles is the same as that of micrometre-sized particles can result in an overprediction of the committed effective dose by two orders of magnitude. Although in this case the use of the default assumptions (5 µm AMAD, Type S) for assessing dose following inhalation exposure to airborne PuO2 nanoparticles appears to be conservative, the evaluation of situations involving PuO2 nanoparticles that may have different particle size and solubility properties should prudently follow the ICRP recommendation to obtain and use additional, material-specific information whenever possible.
已根据啮齿动物研究中可用的生物动力学数据确定了239PuO2和238PuO2的比吸收参数,并评估了这些参数对吸入纳米PuO2材料后生物测定解释和剂量测定的影响。将急性摄入239PuO2和238PuO2纳米颗粒后的活度计算结果与使用国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)66呼吸道模型的标准默认吸收参数进行的相应计算结果进行了比较。还评估并比较了待积有效剂量。在这种情况下,发现假设PuO2纳米颗粒的生物动力学行为与微米级颗粒相同来解释生物测定测量结果,可能会导致待积有效剂量高估两个数量级。尽管在这种情况下,使用默认假设(空气动力学直径为5μm,S型)来评估吸入空气中的PuO2纳米颗粒后的剂量似乎是保守的,但对于涉及可能具有不同粒径和溶解性的PuO2纳米颗粒的情况进行评估时,应谨慎遵循ICRP的建议,尽可能获取并使用额外的、特定材料的信息。