Assifi Anisa R, Berger Blair, Tunçalp Özge, Khosla Rajat, Ganatra Bela
WHO Department of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152224. eCollection 2016.
Incorrect knowledge of laws may affect how women enter the health system or seek services, and it likely contributes to the disconnect between official laws and practical applications of the laws that influence women's access to safe, legal abortion services.
To provide a synthesis of evidence of women's awareness and knowledge of the legal status of abortion in their country, and the accuracy of women's knowledge on specific legal grounds and restrictions outlined in a country's abortion law.
A systematic search was carried for articles published between 1980-2015. Quantitative, mixed-method data collection, and objectives related to women's awareness or knowledge of the abortion law was included. Full texts were assessed, and data extraction done by a single reviewer. Final inclusion for analysis was assessed by two reviewers. The results were synthesised into tables, using narrative synthesis.
Of the original 3,126 articles, and 16 hand searched citations, 24 studies were included for analysis. Women's correct general awareness and knowledge of the legal status was less than 50% in nine studies. In six studies, knowledge of legalization/liberalisation ranged between 32.3%-68.2%. Correct knowledge of abortion on the grounds of rape ranged from 12.8%-98%, while in the case of incest, ranged from 9.8%-64.5%. Abortion on the grounds of fetal impairment and gestational limits, varied widely from 7%-94% and 0%-89.5% respectively.
This systematic review synthesizes literature on women's awareness and knowledge of the abortion law in their own context. The findings show that correct general awareness and knowledge of the abortion law and legal grounds and restrictions amongst women was limited, even in countries where the laws were liberal. Thus, interventions to disseminate accurate information on the legal context are necessary.
对法律的错误认知可能会影响女性进入医疗系统或寻求服务的方式,而且很可能导致影响女性获得安全合法堕胎服务的官方法律与法律实际应用之间出现脱节。
综合关于女性对本国堕胎法律地位的知晓和了解情况,以及女性对一国堕胎法律所规定的具体法律依据和限制的认知准确性的证据。
对1980年至2015年间发表的文章进行系统检索。纳入了与女性对堕胎法律的知晓或了解情况相关的定量、混合方法数据收集及目标。由一名审阅者评估全文并进行数据提取。由两名审阅者评估最终纳入分析的内容。结果通过叙述性综合法汇总成表格。
在最初的3126篇文章和16篇手工检索的文献中,有24项研究被纳入分析。在9项研究中,女性对法律地位的正确总体知晓率不到50%。在6项研究中,对合法化/自由化的知晓率在32.3%至68.2%之间。因强奸而堕胎的正确知晓率在12.8%至98%之间,而因乱伦而堕胎的知晓率在9.8%至64.5%之间。因胎儿缺陷和孕期限制而堕胎的知晓率差异很大,分别为7%至94%和0%至89.5%。
本系统评价综合了关于女性在自身背景下对堕胎法律的知晓和了解情况的文献。研究结果表明,即使在法律宽松的国家,女性对堕胎法律及其法律依据和限制的正确总体知晓率也有限。因此,有必要开展干预措施来传播关于法律背景的准确信息。