Lúcio Adélia, Dʼancona Carlos Arturo Levi, Perissinotto Maria Carolina, McLean Linda, Damasceno Benito Pereira, de Moraes Lopes Maria Helena Baena
Adélia Lúcio, PhD, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Carlos Arturo Levi D'ancona, PhD, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Maria Carolina Perissinotto, PhD, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Linda McLean, PhD, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Benito Pereira Damasceno, PhD, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Maria Helena Baena de Moraes Lopes, PhD, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;43(4):414-9. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000223.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intravaginal neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and health-related quality of life in women undergoing pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training (PFMT) with multiple sclerosis (MS) and to compare the efficacy of these 2 approaches.
Randomized controlled trial.
Thirty women with MS and LUTS were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups and received treatment for 12 weeks. Ten women in group 1 received PFMT with electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback and sham NMES. Ten women in group 2 underwent PFMT with EMG biofeedback and intravaginal NMES, and 10 subjects in group 3 received PFMT with EMG biofeedback and TTNS. Multiple assessments, performed before and after treatment, included a 24-hour pad test, 3-day bladder diary, assessment of PFM function (strength and muscle tone), urodynamic studies, and validated questionnaires including Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-V8), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), and Qualiveen instrument.
All groups showed reductions in pad weight, frequency of urgency and urge urinary incontinence episodes, improvement in all domains of the PFM assessment, and lower scores on the OAB-V8 and ICIQ-SF questionnaires following treatment. Subjects in group 2 achieved significantly greater improvement in PFM tone, flexibility, ability to relax PFMs, and OAB-V8 scores when compared to subjects in groups 1 and 3.
Results suggest that PFMT alone or in combination with intravaginal NMES or TTNS is effective in the treatment of LUTS in patients with MS. The combination of PFMT and NMES offers some advantage in the reduction of PFM tone and symptoms of overactive bladder.
本研究旨在评估阴道内神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)和经皮胫神经刺激(TTNS)对患有多发性硬化症(MS)且正在接受盆底肌训练(PFMT)的女性下尿路症状(LUTS)及健康相关生活质量的影响,并比较这两种方法的疗效。
随机对照试验。
30名患有MS和LUTS的女性被随机分配至3组中的1组,并接受为期12周的治疗。第1组的10名女性接受带有肌电图(EMG)生物反馈的PFMT和假NMES。第2组的10名女性接受带有EMG生物反馈的PFMT和阴道内NMES,第3组的10名受试者接受带有EMG生物反馈的PFMT和TTNS。在治疗前后进行的多项评估包括24小时护垫试验、3天膀胱日记、盆底肌功能(力量和肌张力)评估、尿动力学研究以及经过验证的问卷,包括膀胱过度活动症问卷(OAB-V8)、国际尿失禁咨询问卷简表(ICIQ-SF)和Qualiveen工具。
所有组在治疗后护垫重量、尿急和急迫性尿失禁发作频率均有所降低,盆底肌评估的所有领域均有改善,且OAB-V8和ICIQ-SF问卷得分降低。与第1组和第3组的受试者相比,第2组的受试者在盆底肌张力、灵活性、盆底肌放松能力和OAB-V8评分方面有显著更大的改善。
结果表明,单独的PFMT或与阴道内NMES或TTNS联合使用对MS患者的LUTS治疗有效。PFMT和NMES的联合使用在降低盆底肌张力和膀胱过度活动症状方面具有一定优势。