• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种快速扩弓混合扩弓器中骨传导力传递部件的稳定性决定因素——一项体外研究

Stability determinants of bone-borne force-transmitting components in three RME hybrid expanders-an in vitro study.

作者信息

Walter Andre, Wendl Brigitte, Ploder Oliver, Mojal Sergi, Puigdollers Andreu

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, School of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Clinical Orthodontics, Medical University Clinic, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2017 Feb;39(1):76-84. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw016. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjw016
PMID:27036133
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim was to test which component [wire arm, connecting abutment attachment, and orthodontic mini-implant (OMI)] of the force-transmitting system (FTS) in the anterior palate of three commonly used hybrid expanders (HEs; WILMES-HE, LUDWIG-HE, and WINSAUER-HE) deforms under increasing load.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Crude single and double wire arms were tested individually. Non-opening of the maxillae halves was simulated in artificial bone blocks with single wire and double wire FTS specimens. OMIs were inserted 8mm and underwent 6mm of continuous static lateral loading. Deformation angles were measured (X-ray, n = 6) at 0, 3 and 6mm feed. OMIs and abutments were scan electron microscope (SEM) evaluated.

RESULTS

After 1.0mm of loading, the single wire arm of all FTS deformed between 63.4 (16.5) N and 76.2 (18.4) N, and the double wire arm of reinforced FTS (wires positioned 'side by side') deformed after 1.0mm between 110.0 (18.4) N and 134.8 (22.3) N. The crude single wire resisted 89 (5.1) N until plastic deformation, whereas the crude double wire positioned 'on top of each other' resisted 438 (21.3) N. At 6mm loading, the reinforced WINSAUER-HE FTS withstood a maximum load of 320.9 (31.1) N and the reinforced LUDWIG-HE FTS 19% less, both under great deformation of double wires and OMIs. The screw-fixated WILMES-HE FTS abutment attachment (overlapping OMI head 34%) detached around 250N. The bonded WINSAUER-HE and LUDWIG-HE abutment attachments did not detach. Nor did the modified bonded plus the modified screw-fixated WILMES-HE abutment attachment when overlapping 100%.

CONCLUSION

Early OMI and single wire arm deformation in HEs are crucial for unsuccessful RME in more mature maxillae. Double wire arms should be obligatory. OMIs with inner diameter greater 1.36mm are recommended. One hundred per cent overlapping abutment attachments do not detach.

摘要

背景

目的是测试三种常用混合扩弓器(HEs;威尔姆斯扩弓器、路德维希扩弓器和温绍尔扩弓器)在前腭部的力传递系统(FTS)的哪个组件[钢丝臂、连接基台附件和正畸微型种植体(OMI)]在负荷增加时会发生变形。

材料与方法

分别对粗制单丝和双丝臂进行测试。在带有单丝和双丝FTS标本的人工骨块中模拟上颌两半未打开的情况。将OMI植入8mm,并进行6mm的连续静态侧向加载。在进给0、3和6mm时测量变形角度(X射线,n = 6)。对OMI和基台进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估。

结果

加载1.0mm后,所有FTS的单丝臂在63.4(16.5)N至76.2(18.4)N之间变形,增强FTS(钢丝“并排”放置)的双丝臂在1.0mm后在110.0(18.4)N至134.8(22.3)N之间变形。粗制单丝在89(5.1)N时出现塑性变形,而粗制双丝“叠放”时能承受438(21.3)N。在加载6mm时,增强的温绍尔扩弓器FTS承受了320.9(31.1)N的最大负荷,增强的路德维希扩弓器FTS承受的负荷少19%,此时双丝和OMI均发生较大变形。螺丝固定的威尔姆斯扩弓器FTS基台附件(OMI头部重叠34%)在约250N时分离。粘结的温绍尔扩弓器和路德维希扩弓器基台附件未分离。当重叠100%时,改良粘结加改良螺丝固定的威尔姆斯扩弓器基台附件也未分离。

结论

混合扩弓器中早期的OMI和单丝臂变形是上颌骨较成熟时快速扩弓失败的关键因素。应强制使用双丝臂。建议使用内径大于1.36mm的OMI。100%重叠的基台附件不会分离。

相似文献

1
Stability determinants of bone-borne force-transmitting components in three RME hybrid expanders-an in vitro study.三种快速扩弓混合扩弓器中骨传导力传递部件的稳定性决定因素——一项体外研究
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Feb;39(1):76-84. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw016. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
2
Stability of the anterior arm of three different Hyrax hybrid expanders: an in vitro study.三种不同Hyrax混合扩弓器前臂的稳定性:一项体外研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Jan;23(1):37-45. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.037-045.oar.
3
In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.体外静态负荷下三种氧化锆种植体基台的评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Apr;109(4):255-63. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60054-2.
4
Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.钛和氧化锆基台的抗折能力:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):304-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60306-6.
5
A pilot study of joint stability at the zirconium or titanium abutment/titanium implant interface.关于氧化锆或钛基台/钛种植体界面的稳定性的初步研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):338-43. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3116.
6
An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.对具有两种基台设计和三种不同固位螺钉合金的锥形种植体系统进行体外负荷评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):733-7.
7
Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.疲劳加载对二硅酸锂和氧化锆种植体基台的断裂强度和失效模式的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jan;29(1):20-27. doi: 10.1111/clr.13034. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
8
The Impact of Force Transmission on Narrow-Body Dental Implants Made of Commercially Pure Titanium and Titanium Zirconia Alloy with a Conical Implant-Abutment Connection: An Experimental Pilot Study.力传递对采用商业纯钛和钛锆合金制成的、具有锥形种植体-基台连接的窄体牙种植体的影响:一项实验性初步研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1066-71. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4632.
9
Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.比较可压金属陶瓷定制种植体基台与商业化 CAD/CAM 氧化锆种植体基台的抗折能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):389-96. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
10
Telescopic magnetic attachment for implant-supported denture: evaluation of splint effect.种植体支持式义齿的伸缩式磁性附着体:夹板效果评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):657-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Adult maxillary expansion: CBCT evaluation of skeletal changes and determining an efficiency factor between force-controlled polycyclic slow activation and continuous rapid activation for mini-screw-assisted palatal expansion - MASPE vs. MARPE.成人上颌扩弓:锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估骨骼变化以及确定微型螺钉辅助腭中缝扩展(MASPE)与微种植体支抗快速腭中缝扩展(MARPE)在力控制多环慢速激活和持续快速激活之间的效率因子
Head Face Med. 2024 Dec 2;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00474-6.
2
Biomechanical behavior of three maxillary expanders in cleft lip and palate: a finite element study.三种上颌扩弓器在唇腭裂中的生物力学行为:有限元研究。
Braz Oral Res. 2024 Apr 8;38:e010. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0010. eCollection 2024.
3
The effect of different orthodontic mini-implant brands and geometry on primary stability (an in vitro study).
不同正畸微型种植体品牌和几何形状对初期稳定性的影响(一项体外研究)
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 6;9(9):e19858. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19858. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Success and complication rate of miniscrew assisted non-surgical palatal expansion in adults - a consecutive study using a novel force-controlled polycyclic activation protocol.成人微螺钉辅助非手术腭扩张的成功率和并发症率 - 使用新型力控制多环激活方案的连续研究。
Head Face Med. 2021 Dec 11;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13005-021-00301-2.
5
CBCT and CAD-CAM technology to design a minimally invasive maxillary expander.CBCT 和 CAD-CAM 技术设计微创上颌扩张器。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01292-3.
6
Molar inclination and surrounding alveolar bone change relative to the design of bone-borne maxillary expanders: .骨支抗上颌扩弓器设计相关的磨牙倾斜度和周围牙槽骨变化: 。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):13-22. doi: 10.2319/050619-316.1. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
7
Evaluation of palatal support tissues for placement of orthodontic mini-implants in mouth breathers with high-narrow palates versus nose breathers with normal palates: a retrospective study.高拱腭口呼吸者与正常腭鼻呼吸者正畸微种植体植入的腭支持组织评估:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar;24(3):1259-1267. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03004-w. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
8
Stability of the anterior arm of three different Hyrax hybrid expanders: an in vitro study.三种不同Hyrax混合扩弓器前臂的稳定性:一项体外研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Jan;23(1):37-45. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.037-045.oar.