Quittnat Pelletier Friederike, Joarder Mohammad, Poutanen Susan M, Lok Charmaine E
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, and.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 May 6;11(5):847-854. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09110815. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
Guideline-recommended diagnostic criteria for hemodialysis (HD) catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are based on data from indwelling central catheters in patients not on HD and non-HD situations, and upon which peripheral vein cultures are the gold standard. We aimed to examine the validity of these criteria in patients on HD.
DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Adult patients on in-center HD using catheters were prospectively followed from 2011 to 2014 at a large academic-based HD facility (Toronto, Canada). When a CRBSI was suspected, blood culture sets were obtained from four sites (peripheral vein, both catheter hubs, and HD circuit) to determine the guideline-recommended differential time to positivity (DTTP). DTTP criteria were met when catheter hub cultures turned positive ≥120 minutes before peripheral vein cultures. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were first calculated using peripheral vein cultures as the gold standard and then these same calculations were repeated with additional information, including exit site/catheter tip and HD circuit cultures, as the true gold standard. The feasibility of obtaining peripheral vein cultures was determined.
Of 178 suspected CRBSIs, 100 had peripheral vein blood cultures. Using the true gold standard, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of blood culture results were highest in samples from the HD circuit (93.5%, 100%, and 95%, respectively). The guideline recommended combination of peripheral vein and arterial hub blood cultures was the least sensitive, specific, and accurate (91.7%, 93.1%, and 92.7%, respectively). The diagnostic criteria using measured DTTP were met in less than one third of events.
In patients on HD, blood culture results are the most sensitive, specific, and accurate for diagnosing CRBSIs when taken from the HD circuit and the venous catheter hub, and blood culture results are the least sensitive, specific, and accurate in any combination with peripheral vein cultures. The DTTP does not increase diagnostic accuracy, reducing the necessity for venipuncture and its potential vein damage. Future guidelines should consider the applicability of criterion on specific patient populations and tailor them accordingly.
血液透析(HD)导管相关血流感染(CRBSIs)的指南推荐诊断标准基于非HD患者及非HD情况下留置中心静脉导管的数据,外周静脉血培养是其金标准。我们旨在检验这些标准在HD患者中的有效性。
设计、场所、参与者及测量方法:2011年至2014年,在加拿大安大略省多伦多市一家大型学术性HD机构对使用导管进行中心HD的成年患者进行前瞻性随访。怀疑发生CRBSI时,从四个部位(外周静脉、两个导管接头、HD回路)采集血培养标本,以确定指南推荐的阳性时间差(DTTP)。当导管接头血培养比外周静脉血培养提前≥120分钟出现阳性时,满足DTTP标准。首先以外周静脉血培养为金标准计算敏感性、特异性和准确性,然后以包括出口部位/导管尖端及HD回路血培养等更多信息作为真正的金标准重复上述计算。确定采集外周静脉血培养的可行性。
178例疑似CRBSI患者中,100例进行了外周静脉血培养。以真正的金标准衡量,HD回路血培养标本的血培养结果敏感性、特异性和准确性最高(分别为93.5%、100%和95%)。指南推荐的外周静脉血培养与动脉导管接头血培养组合的敏感性、特异性和准确性最低(分别为91.7%、93.1%和92.7%)。不到三分之一的事件满足使用测量的DTTP的诊断标准。
在HD患者中,从HD回路和静脉导管接头采集血培养标本诊断CRBSI时,血培养结果的敏感性、特异性和准确性最高,外周静脉血培养的任何组合的血培养结果的敏感性、特异性和准确性最低。DTTP并未提高诊断准确性,减少了静脉穿刺及其潜在的静脉损伤。未来指南应考虑该标准对特定患者群体的适用性并相应调整。