Suppr超能文献

欧洲EPIC队列中卵巢癌早期检测生物标志物的前瞻性评估。

A Prospective Evaluation of Early Detection Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer in the European EPIC Cohort.

作者信息

Terry Kathryn L, Schock Helena, Fortner Renée T, Hüsing Anika, Fichorova Raina N, Yamamoto Hidemi S, Vitonis Allison F, Johnson Theron, Overvad Kim, Tjønneland Anne, Boutron-Ruault Marie-Christine, Mesrine Sylvie, Severi Gianluca, Dossus Laure, Rinaldi Sabina, Boeing Heiner, Benetou Vassiliki, Lagiou Pagona, Trichopoulou Antonia, Krogh Vittorio, Kuhn Elisabetta, Panico Salvatore, Bueno-de-Mesquita H Bas, Onland-Moret N Charlotte, Peeters Petra H, Gram Inger Torhild, Weiderpass Elisabete, Duell Eric J, Sanchez Maria-Jose, Ardanaz Eva, Etxezarreta Nerea, Navarro Carmen, Idahl Annika, Lundin Eva, Jirström Karin, Manjer Jonas, Wareham Nicholas J, Khaw Kay-Tee, Byrne Karl Smith, Travis Ruth C, Gunter Marc J, Merritt Melissa A, Riboli Elio, Cramer Daniel W, Kaaks Rudolf

机构信息

Ob/Gyn Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 15;22(18):4664-75. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best source of information to evaluate early detection biomarkers. Here we evaluate the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarkers in prospectively collected samples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We measured CA125, HE4, CA72.4, and CA15.3 in 810 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,939 controls. We calculated the sensitivity at 95% and 98% specificity as well as area under the receiver operator curve (C-statistic) for each marker individually and in combination. In addition, we evaluated marker performance by stage at diagnosis and time between blood draw and diagnosis.

RESULTS

We observed the best discrimination between cases and controls within 6 months of diagnosis for CA125 (C-statistic = 0.92), then HE4 (0.84), CA72.4 (0.77), and CA15.3 (0.73). Marker performance declined with longer time between blood draw and diagnosis and for earlier staged disease. However, assessment of discriminatory ability at early stage was limited by small numbers. Combinations of markers performed modestly, but significantly better than any single marker.

CONCLUSIONS

CA125 remains the single best marker for the early detection of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be slightly improved by combining with other markers. Identifying novel markers for ovarian cancer will require studies including larger numbers of early-stage cases. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4664-75. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Skates, p. 4542.

摘要

目的

约60%的卵巢癌在晚期被诊断出来,此时5年生存率低于30%,而局部疾病的5年生存率为90%。这促使人们寻找早期检测生物标志物。对于初始检测,在卵巢癌诊断前数月或数年采集的样本是评估早期检测生物标志物的最佳信息来源。在此,我们在欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查研究中前瞻性收集的样本中评估了最有前景的卵巢癌筛查生物标志物。

实验设计

我们在810例浸润性上皮性卵巢癌病例和1939例对照中测量了CA125、HE4、CA72.4和CA15.3。我们分别计算了每个标志物单独及联合使用时在95%和98%特异性下的敏感性以及受试者操作特征曲线下面积(C统计量)。此外,我们根据诊断时的分期以及采血与诊断之间的时间评估了标志物的性能。

结果

我们观察到,在诊断后6个月内,CA125对病例和对照的区分能力最佳(C统计量 = 0.92),其次是HE4(0.84)、CA72.4(0.77)和CA15.3(0.73)。标志物性能随着采血与诊断之间时间的延长以及疾病分期的提前而下降。然而,早期阶段的鉴别能力评估因病例数量少而受到限制。标志物组合的表现一般,但明显优于任何单个标志物。

结论

CA125仍然是浸润性上皮性卵巢癌早期检测的最佳单一标志物,但与其他标志物联合使用可略有改善。识别卵巢癌的新标志物需要纳入更多早期病例的研究。《临床癌症研究》;22(18);4664 - 75。©2016美国癌症研究协会。见Skates的相关评论,第4542页。

相似文献

1
A Prospective Evaluation of Early Detection Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer in the European EPIC Cohort.
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 15;22(18):4664-75. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
A multiplex biomarker assay improves the diagnostic performance of HE4 and CA125 in ovarian tumor patients.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 19;15(10):e0240418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240418. eCollection 2020.
5
Prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2022 May;126(9):1301-1309. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01697-z. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
6
Complementary Longitudinal Serum Biomarkers to CA125 for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019 Jun;12(6):391-400. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0377. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
7
Validation of a Novel Biomarker Panel for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Sep;25(9):1333-40. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1299. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
8
Tumor-associated autoantibodies as early detection markers for ovarian cancer? A prospective evaluation.
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 1;143(3):515-526. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31335. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
Diagnostic performance of the biomarkers HE4 and CA125 in type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Oct;131(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.094. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

4
Prospective evaluation of 92 protein biomarkers for early detection of endometrial cancer.
Int J Cancer. 2025 Aug 1;157(3):480-489. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35428. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
5
Preclinical study of inetetamab combined with atezolizumab to synergistically inhibit HER2 and PD-L1 in the treatment of ovarian cancer.
Mol Ther Oncol. 2025 Jan 17;33(1):200938. doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2025.200938. eCollection 2025 Mar 20.
6
The Impact of Surgery Delay on Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer.
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 17;15(1):122. doi: 10.3390/life15010122.
7
Gynecological Insights into Lynch Syndrome-A Comprehensive Review of Cancer Screening and Prevention.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 6;60(12):2013. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122013.
9
CypA/TAF15/STAT5A/miR-514a-3p feedback loop drives ovarian cancer metastasis.
Oncogene. 2024 Nov;43(49):3570-3585. doi: 10.1038/s41388-024-03188-w. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
10
Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of systemic inflammatory indicators in the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 2;14:1381268. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1381268. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):945-956. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01224-6. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
2
Identifying post-menopausal women at elevated risk for epithelial ovarian cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Nov;139(2):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
Improving the quality of biomarker discovery research: the right samples and enough of them.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jun;24(6):944-50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1227. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
6
An epidemiologic risk prediction model for ovarian cancer in Europe: the EPIC study.
Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 31;112(7):1257-65. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.22.
7
Leveraging biospecimen resources for discovery or validation of markers for early cancer detection.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 16;107(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv012. Print 2015 Apr.
8
HE4 combined with CA125: favorable screening tool for ovarian cancer.
Med Oncol. 2014 Jan;31(1):808. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0808-0. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
10
Diagnostic performance of the biomarkers HE4 and CA125 in type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Oct;131(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.094. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验