Service user and carer priorities in a Biomedical Research Centre for mental health.
作者信息
Robotham Dan, Wykes Til, Rose Diana, Doughty Lisa, Strange Sally, Neale Joanne, Hotopf Matthew
机构信息
a Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience , King's College London , UK.
出版信息
J Ment Health. 2016 Jun;25(3):185-8. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1167862. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Service user and carer priorities in a Biomedical Research Centre for mental health.生物医学研究中心中服务使用者和护理者的优先事项：心理健康领域
J Ment Health. 2016 Jun;25(3):185-8. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1167862. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
2
Barriers to genuine consumer and carer participation from the perspectives of Australian systemic mental health advocates.澳大利亚系统心理健康倡导者视角下的真正消费者和护理人员参与障碍。
J Ment Health. 2016 Jun;25(3):231-7. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1124383. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
3
Lone voices have an emotional content: focussing on mental health service user and carer involvement.个人观点带有情感内容：关注精神卫生服务使用者及照料者的参与情况。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(2):164-77. doi: 10.1108/09526861111105112.
4
Adding SUGAR: service user and carer collaboration in mental health nursing research.添加SUGAR：精神卫生护理研究中的服务使用者与护理者合作
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2014 Jan;52(1):22-30. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20131126-04. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
5
Building a science of partnership-focused research: forging and sustaining partnerships to support child mental health prevention and services research.建立以伙伴关系为重点的研究科学：建立和维持伙伴关系，以支持儿童心理健康预防和服务研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Jul;39(4):221-4. doi: 10.1007/s10488-012-0427-7.
6
A stronger voice.一个更强有力的声音。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(2):211-22. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2014-0101.
7
A potential model for the first all Wales mental health service user and carer-led research group.一个潜在的全威尔士心理健康服务使用者和照顾者主导的研究小组的模型。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Feb;17(1):31-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01473.x.
8
South African mental health care service user views on priorities for supporting recovery: implications for policy and service development.南非精神卫生保健服务使用者对支持康复重点的看法：对政策和服务发展的启示。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2272-80. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.681005.
9
The optimal forum for a vigorous, active and informed debate about service priorities and therapeutic directions.关于服务重点和治疗方向进行热烈、积极且信息充分的辩论的最佳平台。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;45(11):907-8. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2011.625926.
10
Service user involvement in research.服务使用者参与研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;2(9):780. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00365-X.
引用本文的文献
1
Healthy Smiles: Promoting Good Oral Health for Youth With Serious Mental Illness.健康笑容：促进患有严重精神疾病青少年的口腔健康
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2025 Oct;53(5):564-570. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.13052. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
A realist review of medication optimisation of community dwelling service users with serious mental illness.对患有严重精神疾病的社区居住服务使用者药物优化的现实主义综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Dec 13;34(1):40-52. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016615.
3
Keeping the Agenda Current: Evolution of Australian Lived Experience Mental Health Research Priorities.保持议程的时效性：澳大利亚生活体验心理健康研究重点的演变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138101.
4
Communication pathways from the emergency department to community mental health services: A systematic review.从急诊科到社区心理健康服务的沟通途径：系统评价。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Dec;31(6):1282-1299. doi: 10.1111/inm.13024. Epub 2022 May 22.
5
Mental Health Peer Worker Perspectives on Resources Developed from Lived Experience Research Findings: A Delphi Study.心理健康同伴工作者对从生活经验研究结果中开发的资源的看法：德尔菲研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3881. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073881.
6
Medication optimisation in severe mental illness (MEDIATE): protocol for a realist review.严重精神疾病药物优化（MEDIATE）：一项实际审查研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 24;12(1):e058524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058524.
7
Psychometric properties of a brief, self-report measure of social inclusion: the F-SIM16.简要自我报告社会包容度测量工具 F-SIM16 的心理测量特性。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Jan 21;31:e8. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000755.
8
Virtual World Café Method for Identifying Mental Health Research Priorities: Methodological Case Study.虚拟世界咖啡馆方法在确定精神健康研究重点中的应用：方法学案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 28;19(1):291. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010291.
9
Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production.迷失在阴影中：关于共同生产阴暗面的思考
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 7;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0.
10
Between funder requirements and 'jobbing scientists': the evolution of patient and public involvement in a mental health biomedical research centre - a qualitative study.在资助者要求与“临时科学家”之间：心理健康生物医学研究中心患者及公众参与的演变——一项定性研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Apr 17;6:12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00185-7. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Trends in mental health inequalities in England during a period of recession, austerity and welfare reform 2004 to 2013.2004年至2013年经济衰退、财政紧缩和福利改革期间英格兰心理健康不平等状况的趋势
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
2
Mental health research priorities for Europe.欧洲的心理健康研究重点。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;2(11):1036-42. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00332-6. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
3
Lessons learnt? The importance of metacognition and its implications for Cognitive Remediation in schizophrenia.学到了什么？元认知的重要性及其对精神分裂症认知康复的启示。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 1;6:1259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01259. eCollection 2015.
4
Electronic personal health records for people with severe mental illness; a feasibility study.重度精神疾病患者的电子个人健康记录；一项可行性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 6;15:192. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0558-y.
5
Public Health in the Precision-Medicine Era.精准医学时代的公共卫生
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):499-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1506241.
6
Top-down computerized cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: a case study of an individual with impairment in verbal fluency.精神分裂症的自上而下式计算机化认知康复：一名言语流畅性受损个体的案例研究
Case Rep Psychiatry. 2015;2015:242364. doi: 10.1155/2015/242364. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
7
Determining research priorities through partnership with patients: an overview.通过与患者合作确定研究重点：概述
Semin Dial. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):141-6. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12325. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
8
Understanding factors associated with the translation of cardiovascular research: a multinational case study approach.理解与心血管研究翻译相关的因素：一种多国案例研究方法。
Implement Sci. 2014 Apr 21;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-47.
9
Priorities for mental health research in Europe: A survey among national stakeholders' associations within the ROAMER project.欧洲心理健康研究重点：ROAMER 项目中各国利益相关者协会的调查。
World Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;12(2):165-70. doi: 10.1002/wps.20052.
10
Patient-reported outcome measures: are they patient-generated, patient-centred or patient-valued?患者报告的结局指标：它们是患者生成的、以患者为中心的还是患者重视的？
J Ment Health. 2013 Dec;22(6):555-62. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2012.734653. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
Zotero 插件