• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进行离散数值估计时的快速准确学习。

Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.

作者信息

Sanborn Adam N, Beierholm Ulrik R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 12;12(4):e1004859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004859. eCollection 2016 Apr.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004859
PMID:27070155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4829178/
Abstract

Many everyday estimation tasks have an inherently discrete nature, whether the task is counting objects (e.g., a number of paint buckets) or estimating discretized continuous variables (e.g., the number of paint buckets needed to paint a room). While Bayesian inference is often used for modeling estimates made along continuous scales, discrete numerical estimates have not received as much attention, despite their common everyday occurrence. Using two tasks, a numerosity task and an area estimation task, we invoke Bayesian decision theory to characterize how people learn discrete numerical distributions and make numerical estimates. Across three experiments with novel stimulus distributions we found that participants fell between two common decision functions for converting their uncertain representation into a response: drawing a sample from their posterior distribution and taking the maximum of their posterior distribution. While this was consistent with the decision function found in previous work using continuous estimation tasks, surprisingly the prior distributions learned by participants in our experiments were much more adaptive: When making continuous estimates, participants have required thousands of trials to learn bimodal priors, but in our tasks participants learned discrete bimodal and even discrete quadrimodal priors within a few hundred trials. This makes discrete numerical estimation tasks good testbeds for investigating how people learn and make estimates.

摘要

许多日常估计任务都具有内在的离散性质,无论该任务是对物体进行计数(例如,油漆桶的数量)还是估计离散化的连续变量(例如,粉刷一个房间所需的油漆桶数量)。虽然贝叶斯推理常用于对沿连续尺度做出的估计进行建模,但离散数值估计尽管在日常生活中很常见,却没有受到同等程度的关注。通过两项任务,即数量任务和面积估计任务,我们运用贝叶斯决策理论来描述人们如何学习离散数值分布并进行数值估计。在针对新刺激分布的三项实验中,我们发现参与者在将其不确定表征转换为反应的两种常见决策函数之间:从其后验分布中抽取样本以及取其后验分布的最大值。虽然这与先前使用连续估计任务的研究中发现的决策函数一致,但令人惊讶的是,我们实验中的参与者所学习的先验分布适应性更强:在进行连续估计时,参与者需要数千次试验才能学习到双峰先验,但在我们的任务中,参与者在几百次试验内就学习到了离散双峰甚至离散四峰先验。这使得离散数值估计任务成为研究人们如何学习和进行估计的良好试验平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/6f3c8e8f4004/pcbi.1004859.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/0084daf7ba93/pcbi.1004859.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/0202763ba12e/pcbi.1004859.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/652fa55688ab/pcbi.1004859.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/c51cc193bd93/pcbi.1004859.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/b736a8a73c40/pcbi.1004859.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/6f3c8e8f4004/pcbi.1004859.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/0084daf7ba93/pcbi.1004859.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/0202763ba12e/pcbi.1004859.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/652fa55688ab/pcbi.1004859.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/c51cc193bd93/pcbi.1004859.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/b736a8a73c40/pcbi.1004859.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7435/4829178/6f3c8e8f4004/pcbi.1004859.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.进行离散数值估计时的快速准确学习。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 12;12(4):e1004859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004859. eCollection 2016 Apr.
2
Mixed Bayesian networks: a mixture of Gaussian distributions.混合贝叶斯网络:高斯分布的混合。
Methods Inf Med. 1994 Dec;33(5):535-42.
3
Using Occam's razor and Bayesian modelling to compare discrete and continuous representations in numerosity judgements.运用奥卡姆剃刀原理和贝叶斯建模来比较数字判断中的离散表示和连续表示。
Cogn Psychol. 2020 Nov;122:101309. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101309. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
4
A Fast Numerical Method for Max-Convolution and the Application to Efficient Max-Product Inference in Bayesian Networks.一种用于最大卷积的快速数值方法及其在贝叶斯网络中高效最大乘积推理的应用。
J Comput Biol. 2015 Aug;22(8):770-83. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2015.0013. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
5
Can natural selection encode Bayesian priors?自然选择能否编码贝叶斯先验概率?
J Theor Biol. 2017 Aug 7;426:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 20.
6
How much to trust the senses: likelihood learning.该在多大程度上信任感官:可能性学习。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 14;14(13):13. doi: 10.1167/14.13.13.
7
Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.用于扫视眼动的学习与决策的集成贝叶斯模型。
Neural Netw. 2008 Nov;21(9):1247-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
8
Decision-theoretic models of visual perception and action.视觉感知与行动的决策理论模型。
Vision Res. 2010 Nov 23;50(23):2362-74. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.031. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
9
Continuous trees and NEVADA simulation: a quadrature approach to modeling continuous random variables in decision analysis.连续树与内华达模拟:决策分析中对连续随机变量建模的一种求积方法。
Med Decis Making. 1995 Oct-Dec;15(4):318-32. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500403.
10
Exact and approximate Bayesian estimation of net counting rates.净计数率的精确和近似贝叶斯估计。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2002;102(3):265-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006095.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of episodic memory sampling in evaluation.情景记忆抽样在评估中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):1353-1363. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02413-z. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
2
The autocorrelated Bayesian sampler: A rational process for probability judgments, estimates, confidence intervals, choices, confidence judgments, and response times.自相关贝叶斯采样器:一种用于概率判断、估计、置信区间、选择、置信判断和反应时间的理性过程。
Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;131(2):456-493. doi: 10.1037/rev0000427. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
How effective is incidental learning of the shape of probability distributions?

本文引用的文献

1
Rational use of cognitive resources: levels of analysis between the computational and the algorithmic.认知资源的合理利用:计算层面与算法层面之间的分析层次
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;7(2):217-29. doi: 10.1111/tops.12142. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
2
Of matchers and maximizers: How competition shapes choice under risk and uncertainty.匹配者与最大化者:竞争如何塑造风险和不确定性下的选择。
Cogn Psychol. 2015 May;78:78-98. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
3
Using psychophysics to ask if the brain samples or maximizes.运用心理物理学来探究大脑是进行抽样还是实现最大化。
概率分布形状的附带学习效果如何?
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Aug 2;4(8):170270. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170270. eCollection 2017 Aug.
4
A Bayesian perspective on Likert scales and central tendency.贝叶斯视角下的李克特量表与集中趋势。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1203-1211. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1344-2.
5
Generalization of prior information for rapid Bayesian time estimation.用于快速贝叶斯时间估计的先验信息泛化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 10;114(2):412-417. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610706114. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
J Vis. 2015 Mar 12;15(3):7. doi: 10.1167/15.3.7.
4
Multisensory decisions provide support for probabilistic number representations.多感官决策为概率数字表征提供支持。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun 1;113(10):3490-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00787.2014. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
5
On the origins of suboptimality in human probabilistic inference.人类概率推理中的次优起源。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Jun 19;10(6):e1003661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003661. eCollection 2014 Jun.
6
One and done? Optimal decisions from very few samples.一劳永逸?基于极少样本的最优决策。
Cogn Sci. 2014 May-Jun;38(4):599-637. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12101. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
7
Perceptual estimation obeys Occam's razor.感知估计服从奥卡姆剃刀。
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 23;4:623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00623. eCollection 2013.
8
Internal representations of temporal statistics and feedback calibrate motor-sensory interval timing.内部的时间统计表示和反馈校准运动-感觉间隔定时。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(11):e1002771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002771. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
9
Naïve point estimation.朴素点估计。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):782-800. doi: 10.1037/a0029670. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
10
How the Bayesians got their beliefs (and what those beliefs actually are): comment on Bowers and Davis (2012).贝叶斯主义者是如何形成他们的信仰的(以及这些信仰实际上是什么):对鲍尔斯和戴维斯(2012)的评论。
Psychol Bull. 2012 May;138(3):415-22. doi: 10.1037/a0026884.