• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
TARP γ-2 and γ-8 Differentially Control AMPAR Density Across Schaffer Collateral/Commissural Synapses in the Hippocampal CA1 Area.TARP γ-2和γ-8对海马CA1区中Schaffer侧支/连合突触上的AMPA受体密度具有不同的调控作用。
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 13;36(15):4296-312. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4178-15.2016.
2
TARP γ-2 Is Required for Inflammation-Associated AMPA Receptor Plasticity within Lamina II of the Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn.脊髓背角II层内炎症相关的AMPA受体可塑性需要TARP γ-2。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jun 21;37(25):6007-6020. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0772-16.2017. Epub 2017 May 30.
3
Differences in the expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors between axospinous perforated and nonperforated synapses are related to the configuration and size of postsynaptic densities.轴棘穿孔突触和非穿孔突触之间AMPA和NMDA受体表达的差异与突触后致密物的形态和大小有关。
J Comp Neurol. 2004 Jan 1;468(1):86-95. doi: 10.1002/cne.10950.
4
Phase Separation-Mediated TARP/MAGUK Complex Condensation and AMPA Receptor Synaptic Transmission.相分离介导的 TARP/MAGUK 复合物凝聚和 AMPA 受体突触传递。
Neuron. 2019 Nov 6;104(3):529-543.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
5
TARP γ-7 selectively enhances synaptic expression of calcium-permeable AMPARs.TARP γ-7 选择性增强钙通透性 AMPAR 的突触表达。
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Sep;16(9):1266-74. doi: 10.1038/nn.3473. Epub 2013 Jul 21.
6
Erbin interacts with TARP γ-2 for surface expression of AMPA receptors in cortical interneurons.Erbin 与 TARP γ-2 相互作用,促进皮质中间神经元中 AMPA 受体的表面表达。
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Mar;16(3):290-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3320. Epub 2013 Jan 27.
7
The stoichiometry of AMPA receptors and TARPs varies by neuronal cell type.AMPA受体与跨膜 AMPA 受体调节蛋白(TARPs)的化学计量因神经元细胞类型而异。
Neuron. 2009 Jun 11;62(5):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.016.
8
Stargazin (TARP gamma-2) is required for compartment-specific AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity in cerebellar stellate cells.星状棘蛋白(TARP γ-2)对于小脑星形细胞中特定隔室的 AMPA 受体转运和突触可塑性是必需的。
J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 16;31(11):3939-52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5134-10.2011.
9
Abundant distribution of TARP gamma-8 in synaptic and extrasynaptic surface of hippocampal neurons and its major role in AMPA receptor expression on spines and dendrites.TARP γ-8在海马神经元的突触和突触外表面大量分布及其在棘突和树突上的AMPA受体表达中的主要作用。
Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Oct;24(8):2177-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05081.x.
10
Molecular mechanisms contributing to TARP regulation of channel conductance and polyamine block of calcium-permeable AMPA receptors.参与 TARP 调节通道电导和多胺阻断钙通透性 AMPA 受体的分子机制。
J Neurosci. 2014 Aug 27;34(35):11673-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0383-14.2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular and Anatomical Strengthening of "Winner" Climbing Fiber Synapses in Developing Mouse Purkinje Cells.发育中小鼠浦肯野细胞中“获胜”攀爬纤维突触的分子与解剖学强化
J Neurosci. 2025 Apr 9;45(15):e2156242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-24.2025.
2
A Massively Parallel CRISPR-Based Screening Platform for Modifiers of Neuronal Activity.一个用于神经元活动调节剂的基于CRISPR的大规模平行筛选平台。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 10:2024.02.28.582546. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.28.582546.
3
Fxr1 Deletion from Cortical Parvalbumin Interneurons Modifies Their Excitatory Synaptic Responses.皮质小白蛋白中间神经元中Fxr1基因的缺失改变了它们的兴奋性突触反应。
eNeuro. 2025 Jan 15;12(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0363-24.2024. Print 2025 Jan.
4
CaMKIIα-TARPγ8 signaling mediates hippocampal synaptic impairment in aging.钙/钙调蛋白依赖性蛋白激酶IIα-跨膜 AMPA 受体调节蛋白γ8信号通路介导衰老过程中海马体突触损伤。
Aging Cell. 2025 Jan;24(1):e14349. doi: 10.1111/acel.14349. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
5
Inter and intralaminar excitation of parvalbumin interneurons in mouse barrel cortex.小鼠桶状皮层中小清蛋白中间神经元的层间和层内兴奋
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0289901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289901. eCollection 2024.
6
Differential nanoscale organization of excitatory synapses onto excitatory vs. inhibitory neurons.兴奋性神经元和抑制性神经元上兴奋性突触的纳米级组织差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 23;121(17):e2315379121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2315379121. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
In vitro evaluation of PET radiotracers for imaging synaptic density, the acetylcholine transporter, AMPA-tarp-γ8 and muscarinic M4 receptors in Alzheimer's disease.用于成像阿尔茨海默病中突触密度、乙酰胆碱转运体、AMPA-tarp-γ8和毒蕈碱M4受体的PET放射性示踪剂的体外评估
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Feb 20;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.62347/USWK7545. eCollection 2024.
8
Impact of NLRP3 Depletion on Aging-Related Metaflammation, Cognitive Function, and Social Behavior in Mice.NLRP3 耗竭对小鼠衰老相关代谢炎症、认知功能和社交行为的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 21;24(23):16580. doi: 10.3390/ijms242316580.
9
Enhanced TARP-γ8-PSD-95 coupling in excitatory neurons contributes to the rapid antidepressant-like action of ketamine in male mice.增强的兴奋性神经元中 TARP-γ8-PSD-95 偶联有助于氯胺酮在雄性小鼠中产生快速抗抑郁样作用。
Nat Commun. 2023 Dec 2;14(1):7971. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42780-8.
10
Differential nanoscale organization of excitatory synapses onto excitatory vs inhibitory neurons.兴奋性突触在兴奋性神经元与抑制性神经元上的差异纳米级组织。
bioRxiv. 2023 Sep 7:2023.09.06.556279. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.06.556279.

本文引用的文献

1
AMPARs and synaptic plasticity: the last 25 years.AMPA 受体与突触可塑性:过去 25 年。
Neuron. 2013 Oct 30;80(3):704-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.025.
2
Paradoxical proepileptic response to NMDA receptor blockade linked to cortical interneuron defect in stargazer mice.星爆鼠 NMDA 受体阻断后的矛盾性惊厥反应与皮质中间神经元缺陷有关。
Front Cell Neurosci. 2013 Sep 18;7:156. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00156. eCollection 2013.
3
AMPA receptor/TARP stoichiometry visualized by single-molecule subunit counting.单分子亚基计数可视化 AMPA 受体/TARP 计量比。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 26;110(13):5163-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218765110. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
4
Erbin interacts with TARP γ-2 for surface expression of AMPA receptors in cortical interneurons.Erbin 与 TARP γ-2 相互作用,促进皮质中间神经元中 AMPA 受体的表面表达。
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Mar;16(3):290-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3320. Epub 2013 Jan 27.
5
Regulation of AMPA receptor surface diffusion by PSD-95 slots.PSD-95 槽调控 AMPA 受体表面扩散。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Jun;22(3):453-60. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
6
The expanding social network of ionotropic glutamate receptors: TARPs and other transmembrane auxiliary subunits.离子型谷氨酸受体不断扩展的社交网络:TARPs 和其他跨膜辅助亚基。
Neuron. 2011 Apr 28;70(2):178-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.007.
7
Stargazin (TARP gamma-2) is required for compartment-specific AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity in cerebellar stellate cells.星状棘蛋白(TARP γ-2)对于小脑星形细胞中特定隔室的 AMPA 受体转运和突触可塑性是必需的。
J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 16;31(11):3939-52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5134-10.2011.
8
Glutamate receptor δ2 is essential for input pathway-dependent regulation of synaptic AMPAR contents in cerebellar Purkinje cells.谷氨酸受体 δ2 对于小脑浦肯野细胞中突触 AMPAR 含量的输入途径依赖性调节是必需的。
J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 2;31(9):3362-74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5601-10.2011.
9
CaMKII triggers the diffusional trapping of surface AMPARs through phosphorylation of stargazin.CaMKII 通过磷酸化星状蛋白触发表面 AMPAR 的扩散捕获。
Neuron. 2010 Jul 29;67(2):239-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.007.
10
TARP phosphorylation regulates synaptic AMPA receptors through lipid bilayers.TARP 磷酸化通过脂双层调节突触 AMPA 受体。
Neuron. 2010 Jun 10;66(5):755-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.035.

TARP γ-2和γ-8对海马CA1区中Schaffer侧支/连合突触上的AMPA受体密度具有不同的调控作用。

TARP γ-2 and γ-8 Differentially Control AMPAR Density Across Schaffer Collateral/Commissural Synapses in the Hippocampal CA1 Area.

作者信息

Yamasaki Miwako, Fukaya Masahiro, Yamazaki Maya, Azechi Hirotsugu, Natsume Rie, Abe Manabu, Sakimura Kenji, Watanabe Masahiko

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.

Department of Anatomy, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan, Department of Anatomy, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan, and.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 13;36(15):4296-312. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4178-15.2016.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4178-15.2016
PMID:27076426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6601775/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The number of AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs) at synapses is the major determinant of synaptic strength and varies from synapse to synapse. To clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms, the density of AMPARs, PSD-95, and transmembrane AMPAR regulatory proteins (TARPs) were compared at Schaffer collateral/commissural (SCC) synapses in the adult mouse hippocampal CA1 by quantitative immunogold electron microscopy using serial sections. We examined four types of SCC synapses: perforated and nonperforated synapses on pyramidal cells and axodendritic synapses on parvalbumin-positive (PV synapse) and pravalbumin-negative interneurons (non-PV synapse). SCC synapses were categorized into those expressing high-density (perforated and PV synapses) or low-density (nonperforated and non-PV synapses) AMPARs. Although the density of PSD-95 labeling was fairly constant, the density and composition of TARP isoforms was highly variable depending on the synapse type. Of the three TARPs expressed in hippocampal neurons, the disparity in TARP γ-2 labeling was closely related to that of AMPAR labeling. Importantly, AMPAR density was significantly reduced at perforated and PV synapses in TARP γ-2-knock-out (KO) mice, resulting in a virtual loss of AMPAR disparity among SCC synapses. In comparison, TARP γ-8 was the only TARP expressed at nonperforated synapses, where AMPAR labeling further decreased to a background level in TARP γ-8-KO mice. These results show that synaptic inclusion of TARP γ-2 potently increases AMPAR expression and transforms low-density synapses into high-density ones, whereas TARP γ-8 is essential for low-density or basal expression of AMPARs at nonperforated synapses. Therefore, these TARPs are critically involved in AMPAR density control at SCC synapses.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Although converging evidence implicates the importance of transmembrane AMPA-type glutamate receptor (AMPAR) regulatory proteins (TARPs) in AMPAR stabilization during basal transmission and synaptic plasticity, how they control large disparities in AMPAR numbers or densities across central synapses remains largely unknown. We compared the density of AMPARs with that of TARPs among four types of Schaffer collateral/commissural (SCC) hippocampal synapses in wild-type and TARP-knock-out mice. We show that the density of AMPARs correlates with that of TARP γ-2 across SCC synapses and its high expression is linked to high-density AMPAR expression at perforated type of pyramidal cell synapses and synapses on parvalbumin-positive interneurons. In comparison, TARP γ-8 is the only TARP expressed at nonperforated type of pyramidal cell synapses, playing an essential role in low-density or basal AMPAR expression.

摘要

未标记

突触处α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸(AMPA)型谷氨酸受体(AMPAR)的数量是突触强度的主要决定因素,且因突触而异。为阐明其潜在的分子机制,通过使用连续切片的定量免疫金电子显微镜,比较了成年小鼠海马CA1区中Schaffer侧支/连合(SCC)突触处AMPAR、突触后致密蛋白95(PSD-95)和跨膜AMPAR调节蛋白(TARP)的密度。我们检查了四种类型的SCC突触:锥体细胞上的穿孔和非穿孔突触以及小白蛋白阳性(PV突触)和小白蛋白阴性中间神经元(非PV突触)上的轴树突突触。SCC突触被分为表达高密度(穿孔和PV突触)或低密度(非穿孔和非PV突触)AMPAR的突触。尽管PSD-95标记的密度相当恒定,但TARP亚型的密度和组成因突触类型而异。在海马神经元中表达的三种TARP中,TARP γ-2标记的差异与AMPAR标记的差异密切相关。重要的是,在TARP γ-2基因敲除(KO)小鼠的穿孔和PV突触处,AMPAR密度显著降低,导致SCC突触之间AMPAR差异几乎消失。相比之下,TARP γ-8是唯一在非穿孔突触处表达的TARP,在TARP γ-8-KO小鼠中,非穿孔突触处的AMPAR标记进一步降至背景水平。这些结果表明,TARP γ-2的突触内吞有力地增加了AMPAR的表达,并将低密度突触转变为高密度突触,而TARP γ-8对于非穿孔突触处AMPAR的低密度或基础表达至关重要。因此,这些TARP在SCC突触处的AMPAR密度控制中起关键作用。

意义声明

尽管越来越多的证据表明跨膜AMPA型谷氨酸受体(AMPAR)调节蛋白(TARP)在基础传递和突触可塑性期间对AMPAR稳定的重要性,但它们如何控制中枢突触中AMPAR数量或密度的巨大差异在很大程度上仍然未知。我们在野生型和TARP基因敲除小鼠中比较了四种类型的Schaffer侧支/连合(SCC)海马突触中AMPAR与TARP的密度。我们表明,在SCC突触中,AMPAR的密度与TARP γ-2的密度相关,其高表达与锥体细胞穿孔型突触和小白蛋白阳性中间神经元突触处的高密度AMPAR表达相关。相比之下,TARP γ-8是唯一在锥体细胞非穿孔型突触处表达的TARP,在低密度或基础AMPAR表达中起重要作用。