• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谐音的加工优势:大鼠(褐家鼠)与人类(智人)的比较。

Processing advantages for consonance: A comparison between rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).

作者信息

Crespo-Bojorque Paola, Toro Juan M

机构信息

Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2016 May;130(2):97-108. doi: 10.1037/com0000027. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1037/com0000027
PMID:27078078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5564499/
Abstract

Consonance is a salient perceptual feature in harmonic music associated with pleasantness. Besides being deeply rooted in how we experience music, research suggests consonant intervals are more easily processed than dissonant intervals. In the present work we explore from a comparative perspective if such processing advantage extends to more complex tasks such as the detection of abstract rules. We ran experiments on rule learning over consonant and dissonant intervals with nonhuman animals and human participants. Results show differences across species regarding the extent to which they benefit from differences in consonance. Animals learn abstract rules with the same ease independently of whether they are implemented over consonant intervals (Experiment 1), dissonant intervals (Experiment 2), or over a combination of them (Experiment 3). Humans, on the contrary, learn an abstract rule better when it is implemented over consonant (Experiment 4) than over dissonant intervals (Experiment 5). Moreover, their performance improves when there is a mapping between abstract categories defining a rule and consonant and dissonant intervals (Experiments 6 and 7). Results suggest that for humans, consonance might be used as a perceptual anchor for other cognitive processes as to facilitate the detection of abstract patterns. Lacking extensive experience with harmonic stimuli, nonhuman animals tested here do not seem to benefit from a processing advantage for consonant intervals. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

协和音是和声音乐中与愉悦感相关的一个显著感知特征。除了深深植根于我们体验音乐的方式之外,研究表明协和音程比不协和音程更容易被处理。在本研究中,我们从比较的角度探讨这种处理优势是否会扩展到更复杂的任务,比如抽象规则的检测。我们对非人类动物和人类参与者进行了关于协和音程和不协和音程规则学习的实验。结果表明,不同物种从协和性差异中受益的程度存在差异。动物学习抽象规则的难易程度与规则是通过协和音程(实验1)、不协和音程(实验2)还是它们的组合(实验3)来实现无关。相反,人类在协和音程上实现抽象规则时(实验4)比在不协和音程上(实验5)学得更好。此外,当定义规则的抽象类别与协和音程和不协和音程之间存在映射关系时(实验6和7),他们的表现会有所提高。结果表明,对于人类来说,协和音可能被用作其他认知过程的感知锚点,以促进抽象模式的检测。由于缺乏对和声刺激的广泛体验,这里测试的非人类动物似乎没有从协和音程的处理优势中受益。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Processing advantages for consonance: A comparison between rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).谐音的加工优势:大鼠(褐家鼠)与人类(智人)的比较。
J Comp Psychol. 2016 May;130(2):97-108. doi: 10.1037/com0000027. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
2
The use of interval ratios in consonance perception by rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).大鼠(褐家鼠)和人类(智人)在和谐感知中对音程比率的运用。
J Comp Psychol. 2015 Feb;129(1):42-51. doi: 10.1037/a0037991. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
3
Is consonance attractive to budgerigars? No evidence from a place preference study.共鸣对虎皮鹦鹉有吸引力吗?来自偏好位置研究的证据。
Anim Cogn. 2020 Sep;23(5):973-987. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01404-0. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
4
Early neural responses underlie advantages for consonance over dissonance.早期神经反应为和谐音优于不和谐音提供了基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Aug;117:188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
5
Phase locked neural activity in the human brainstem predicts preference for musical consonance.人类脑干中的锁相神经活动预测对音乐协和音的偏好。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 May;58(100):23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
6
Sensory consonance and the perceptual similarity of complex-tone harmonic intervals: tests of adult and infant listeners.感官和谐与复合音谐波音程的感知相似性:成人和婴儿听众的测试
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Nov;100(5):3321-8. doi: 10.1121/1.417355.
7
Neural activity related to discrimination and vocal production of consonant and dissonant musical intervals.与协和与不协和音乐音程辨别及发声相关的神经活动。
Brain Res. 2016 Jul 15;1643:59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.04.065. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
8
Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem.人类脑干中和谐、不和谐以及音高等级的神经关联。
J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 21;29(42):13165-71. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3900-09.2009.
9
Cognitive interference can be mitigated by consonant music and facilitated by dissonant music.和谐的音乐可以减轻认知干扰,而不和谐的音乐则会加剧认知干扰。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2028. doi: 10.1038/srep02028.
10
Chicks like consonant music.小鸡喜欢辅音音乐。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Oct;22(10):1270-3. doi: 10.1177/0956797611418244. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Pleasantness makes a good time: musical consonance shapes interpersonal synchronization in dyadic joint action.愉悦感成就美好时光:音乐和谐在二元联合行动中塑造人际同步。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Oct 22;18:1472632. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1472632. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of a veterinary functional music-based enrichment program on the psychophysiological responses of farm pigs.兽医功能性音乐强化方案对农场猪的心理生理反应的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68407-6.
3
Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats.

本文引用的文献

1
(Dis-)Harmony in movement: effects of musical dissonance on movement timing and form.运动中的(不)和谐:音乐不和谐对运动时机和形式的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 May;233(5):1585-95. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4233-9. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
2
Searching for the origins of musicality across species.探寻跨物种音乐性的起源。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140094. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0094.
3
Without it no music: cognition, biology and evolution of musicality.没有它就没有音乐:音乐性的认知、生物学与进化
识别新颖曲调中的结构:人类与大鼠的差异。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 2;27(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01848-8.
4
Music as aposematic signal: predator defense strategies in early human evolution.音乐作为警戒信号:早期人类进化中的捕食者防御策略
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 16;14:1271854. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271854. eCollection 2023.
5
Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective.粗糙度感知:多感觉/跨模态视角。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Oct;84(7):2087-2114. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02550-y. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
6
Detecting surface changes in a familiar tune: exploring pitch, tempo and timbre.探测熟悉曲调中的表面变化:探索音高、节奏和音色。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):951-960. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01604-w. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
7
Animal Signals, Music and Emotional Well-Being.动物信号、音乐与情绪健康。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 11;11(9):2670. doi: 10.3390/ani11092670.
8
Memorisation and implicit perceptual learning are enhanced for preferred musical intervals and chords.记忆和内隐感知学习增强了对偏好的音乐音程和和弦的认知。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Oct;28(5):1623-1637. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01922-z. Epub 2021 May 4.
9
Aesthetic appreciation of musical intervals enhances behavioural and neurophysiological indexes of attentional engagement and motor inhibition.音乐音程的审美欣赏提高了注意力投入和运动抑制的行为和神经生理指标。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 6;9(1):18550. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55131-9.
10
Early neural responses underlie advantages for consonance over dissonance.早期神经反应为和谐音优于不和谐音提供了基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Aug;117:188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140088. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0088.
4
The use of interval ratios in consonance perception by rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).大鼠(褐家鼠)和人类(智人)在和谐感知中对音程比率的运用。
J Comp Psychol. 2015 Feb;129(1):42-51. doi: 10.1037/a0037991. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
5
Processing of hierarchical syntactic structure in music.音乐中层次句法结构的加工
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):15443-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300272110. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
6
Revisiting the innate preference for consonance.重新审视对和谐的固有偏好。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):40-9. doi: 10.1037/a0033471. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
7
Perceptual categories enable pattern generalization in songbirds.感知类别使鸣禽能够进行模式泛化。
Cognition. 2013 Aug;128(2):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 May 10.
8
Consonance and pitch.协和音和音高。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1142-58. doi: 10.1037/a0030830. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
9
Rule learning over consonants and vowels in a non-human animal.在非人类动物中学习辅音和元音的规则。
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.015. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
10
Black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) and human (Homo sapiens) chord discrimination.黑顶山雀(Poecile atricapillus)与人类(智人)的和弦辨别能力。
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Feb;126(1):57-67. doi: 10.1037/a0024627. Epub 2011 Sep 26.