Jordan J, Singh N N, Repp A C
Templeton Hospital and Training Center, Educational Research and Services Center, Inc., DeKalb, Illinois 60115.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1989 Spring;22(1):9-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-9.
Gentle teaching and visual screening techniques have been used to control severe behavior problems in persons with mental retardation. An alternating treatments design was used to compare gentle teaching, visual screening, and a task-training condition in the reduction of the high-level stereotypy of 3 persons with mental retardation. Following a baseline phase, a task-training condition using standard behavioral techniques was implemented to establish the effects of training the subjects on the tasks. Results showed a modest decrease in stereotypy. This phase was followed by an alternating treatments phase in which visual screening, gentle teaching, and baseline conditions were compared. Both procedures were superior to the control condition in reducing stereotypic behavior, with visual screening being more effective than gentle teaching. When compared with data from the prior phase, gentle teaching was found to be more effective than task training for 2 subjects but less effective for the 3rd, whose stereotypy increased during gentle teaching. Two succeeding phases in which visual screening was implemented across two and then all three daily conditions reduced stereotypy further to near-zero levels. An additional phase with 1 subject demonstrated that the treatment effects of visual screening were easily replicated across therapists. Mixed and idiosyncratic changes in collateral behaviors occurred. For example, "bonding," the goal of gentle teaching, occurred at the same low levels under both treatments, contrary to the predictions of gentle teaching's proponents. The results indicate that gentle teaching may not be the universal treatment of choice for stereotypy its proponents suggest, and that it requires further empirical evaluation.
温和教学和视觉筛查技术已被用于控制智力障碍者的严重行为问题。采用交替治疗设计,比较温和教学、视觉筛查和任务训练条件对3名智力障碍者高水平刻板行为的减少效果。在基线期之后,实施使用标准行为技术的任务训练条件,以确定训练受试者完成任务的效果。结果显示刻板行为略有减少。此阶段之后是交替治疗阶段,在此阶段比较视觉筛查、温和教学和基线条件。两种程序在减少刻板行为方面均优于对照条件,其中视觉筛查比温和教学更有效。与前一阶段的数据相比,发现温和教学对2名受试者比任务训练更有效,但对第3名受试者效果较差,其刻板行为在温和教学期间增加。随后的两个阶段,先是在两种日常条件下实施视觉筛查,然后在所有三种日常条件下实施,将刻板行为进一步降低到接近零的水平。对1名受试者进行的额外阶段表明,视觉筛查的治疗效果很容易在不同治疗师之间复制。伴随行为出现了混合和特殊的变化。例如,温和教学的目标“建立联系”在两种治疗下都处于相同的低水平,这与温和教学支持者的预测相反。结果表明,温和教学可能并非其支持者所建议的针对刻板行为的普遍首选治疗方法,并且需要进一步的实证评估。