2nd Floor Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Academic Neurology Unit, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;45:157-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) are common in neurological settings and often associated with considerable distress and disability. The psychological mechanisms underlying PNES are poorly understood and there is a lack of well-established, evidence-based treatments. This paper advances our understanding of PNES by providing a comprehensive systematic review of the evidence pertaining to the main theoretical models of this phenomenon. Methodological quality appraisal and effect size calculation were conducted on one hundred forty empirical studies on the following aspects of PNES: life adversity, dissociation, anxiety, suggestibility, attentional dysfunction, family/relationship problems, insecure attachment, defence mechanisms, somatization/conversion, coping, emotion regulation, alexithymia, emotional processing, symptom modelling, learning and expectancy. Although most of the studies were only of low to moderate quality, some findings are sufficiently consistent to warrant tentative conclusions: (i) physical symptom reporting is elevated in patients with PNES; (ii) trait dissociation and exposure to traumatic events are common but not inevitable correlates of PNES; (iii) there is a mismatch between subjective reports of anxiety and physical arousal during PNES; and (iv) inconsistent findings in this area are likely to be attributable to the heterogeneity of patients with PNES. Empirical, theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.
心因性非癫痫性发作 (PNES) 在神经科环境中很常见,常伴有明显的痛苦和残疾。PNES 的心理机制尚不清楚,也缺乏经过充分验证的循证治疗方法。本文通过对与这一现象主要理论模型相关的证据进行全面系统的综述,增进了我们对 PNES 的理解。对 140 项关于 PNES 的实证研究进行了方法学质量评估和效应量计算,研究内容包括:生活逆境、分离、焦虑、暗示性、注意力障碍、家庭/关系问题、不安全依恋、防御机制、躯体化/转换、应对、情绪调节、述情障碍、情绪处理、症状建模、学习和期望。尽管大多数研究的质量仅为低到中等水平,但一些发现足够一致,可以得出初步结论:(i)PNES 患者的躯体症状报告增加;(ii)特质分离和创伤事件暴露是常见的,但不是 PNES 的必然相关因素;(iii)PNES 期间主观报告的焦虑与身体唤醒之间存在不匹配;(iv)这一领域的不一致发现可能归因于 PNES 患者的异质性。本文讨论了其对实证、理论和临床的意义。