Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Department of Radiology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 May;9(5):459-462. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012319. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
Flow control during endovascular stroke treatment with stent-retrievers is crucial for successful revascularization. The standard technique recommended by stent-retriever manufacturers implies obstruction of the respective access catheter by the microcatheter, through which the stent-retriever is delivered. This, in turn, results in reduced aspiration during thrombectomy. In order to maximize aspiration, we fully retract the microcatheter out of the access catheter before thrombectomy-an approach we term the 'bare wire thrombectomy' (BWT) technique. We verified the improved throughput with systematic in vitro studies and assessed the clinical effectiveness and safety of this method.
We compared aspiration flow of water through various access catheters (5-8 F) with a Rebar microcatheter (0.18 inch and 0.27 inch) and a Trevo stent-retriever using the standard technique and the BWT technique in vitro. We also retrospectively analyzed 302 retrieval maneuvers in 117 patients who received endovascular treatment with a stent-retriever between February 2010 and April 2015.
In the in vitro experiment, removal of the microcatheter in all tested settings resulted in significantly increased aspiration flow through the access catheter (p<0.001). This effect was particularly pronounced in access catheters with a diameter of ≤7 F. In the clinical study, the revascularization rate (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction ≥2b) was 91%. There were no complications associated with the BWT technique in 302 retrieval maneuvers.
The BWT technique results in improved aspiration flow rates compared with the standard deployment technique. Our clinical data show that the BWT technique is effective and safe.
血管内卒中治疗中使用支架取栓器时的血流控制对于成功再通至关重要。支架取栓器制造商推荐的标准技术意味着微导管会阻塞相应的进入导管,支架取栓器通过该导管输送。这反过来又会导致血栓切除术中抽吸减少。为了最大限度地提高抽吸效果,我们在血栓切除术前将微导管完全从进入导管中撤出——我们称之为“裸线血栓切除”(BWT)技术。我们通过系统的体外研究验证了这种方法的改进流量,并评估了这种方法的临床效果和安全性。
我们在体外比较了水通过各种进入导管(5-8F)的抽吸流量,以及使用标准技术和 BWT 技术的 Rebar 微导管(0.18 英寸和 0.27 英寸)和 Trevo 支架取栓器。我们还回顾性分析了 2010 年 2 月至 2015 年 4 月期间 117 例接受支架取栓器血管内治疗的患者的 302 次取栓操作。
在体外实验中,在所有测试设置中移除微导管都会导致进入导管的抽吸流量显著增加(p<0.001)。在直径≤7F 的进入导管中,这种效果更为明显。在临床研究中,血管再通率(血栓溶解率≥2b)为 91%。在 302 次取栓操作中,BWT 技术没有与并发症相关。
与标准部署技术相比,BWT 技术可提高抽吸流量。我们的临床数据表明,BWT 技术是有效且安全的。