• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂网络的控制需要结构和动力学两者。

Control of complex networks requires both structure and dynamics.

作者信息

Gates Alexander J, Rocha Luis M

机构信息

School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 18;6:24456. doi: 10.1038/srep24456.

DOI:10.1038/srep24456
PMID:27087469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4834509/
Abstract

The study of network structure has uncovered signatures of the organization of complex systems. However, there is also a need to understand how to control them; for example, identifying strategies to revert a diseased cell to a healthy state, or a mature cell to a pluripotent state. Two recent methodologies suggest that the controllability of complex systems can be predicted solely from the graph of interactions between variables, without considering their dynamics: structural controllability and minimum dominating sets. We demonstrate that such structure-only methods fail to characterize controllability when dynamics are introduced. We study Boolean network ensembles of network motifs as well as three models of biochemical regulation: the segment polarity network in Drosophila melanogaster, the cell cycle of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the floral organ arrangement in Arabidopsis thaliana. We demonstrate that structure-only methods both undershoot and overshoot the number and which sets of critical variables best control the dynamics of these models, highlighting the importance of the actual system dynamics in determining control. Our analysis further shows that the logic of automata transition functions, namely how canalizing they are, plays an important role in the extent to which structure predicts dynamics.

摘要

网络结构研究揭示了复杂系统的组织特征。然而,理解如何控制这些系统同样必要;例如,确定将病变细胞恢复到健康状态,或将成熟细胞恢复到多能状态的策略。最近的两种方法表明,复杂系统的可控性仅可从变量间相互作用图预测得出,而无需考虑其动态特性:结构可控性和最小支配集。我们证明,当引入动态特性时,此类仅基于结构的方法无法刻画可控性。我们研究了网络基序的布尔网络集合以及三种生化调控模型:黑腹果蝇的体节极性网络、酿酒酵母的细胞周期以及拟南芥的花器官排列。我们证明,仅基于结构的方法在关键变量的数量以及哪些关键变量集能最佳控制这些模型的动态特性方面,既存在低估也存在高估,这凸显了实际系统动态特性在确定控制方面的重要性。我们的分析进一步表明,自动机转移函数的逻辑,即其正则化程度,在结构预测预测动态特性预测动态特性的程度方面起着重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/5edbd56da379/srep24456-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/7aa7f9f93ce1/srep24456-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/86f3f6df0de5/srep24456-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/0b94a803265b/srep24456-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/cb4020fa9141/srep24456-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/364d15838729/srep24456-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/5edbd56da379/srep24456-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/7aa7f9f93ce1/srep24456-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/86f3f6df0de5/srep24456-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/0b94a803265b/srep24456-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/cb4020fa9141/srep24456-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/364d15838729/srep24456-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/307e/4834509/5edbd56da379/srep24456-f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Control of complex networks requires both structure and dynamics.复杂网络的控制需要结构和动力学两者。
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 18;6:24456. doi: 10.1038/srep24456.
2
Robustness and state-space structure of Boolean gene regulatory models.布尔基因调控模型的稳健性与状态空间结构
J Theor Biol. 2007 Dec 21;249(4):749-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
3
Controllability and observability of Boolean networks arising from biology.源自生物学的布尔网络的可控性与可观测性
Chaos. 2015 Feb;25(2):023104. doi: 10.1063/1.4907708.
4
CANA: A Python Package for Quantifying Control and Canalization in Boolean Networks.CANA:用于量化布尔网络中控制和渠化的Python包。
Front Physiol. 2018 Aug 14;9:1046. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01046. eCollection 2018.
5
Logical analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle.酵母细胞周期的逻辑分析。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Apr 21;257(4):543-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.12.028. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
6
Controllability analysis of transcriptional regulatory networks reveals circular control patterns among transcription factors.转录调控网络的可控性分析揭示了转录因子之间的循环控制模式。
Integr Biol (Camb). 2015 May;7(5):560-8. doi: 10.1039/c4ib00247d. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
7
Irrelevance of linear controllability to nonlinear dynamical networks.线性可控性与非线性动力网络无关。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 3;10(1):3961. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11822-5.
8
Function constrains network architecture and dynamics: a case study on the yeast cell cycle Boolean network.功能约束网络结构与动态:以酵母细胞周期布尔网络为例的研究
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 May;75(5 Pt 1):051907. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.051907. Epub 2007 May 9.
9
Genome-wide system analysis reveals stable yet flexible network dynamics in yeast.全基因组系统分析揭示了酵母中稳定而灵活的网络动态。
IET Syst Biol. 2009 Jul;3(4):219-28. doi: 10.1049/iet-syb.2008.0112.
10
Boolean modeling of biological regulatory networks: a methodology tutorial.布尔网络生物调控系统建模:方法教程。
Methods. 2013 Jul 15;62(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying edge relevance for epidemic spreading via the semi-metric topology of complex networks.通过复杂网络的半度量拓扑量化疫情传播的边缘相关性。
J Phys Complex. 2025 Sep 1;6(3):035005. doi: 10.1088/2632-072X/adf2ed. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
2
Associative conditioning in gene regulatory network models increases integrative causal emergence.基因调控网络模型中的联合条件作用增加了整合性因果涌现。
Commun Biol. 2025 Jul 9;8(1):1027. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08411-2.
3
Global stabilization of Boolean networks with applications to biomolecular network control.

本文引用的文献

1
Observability and Controllability of Nonlinear Networks: The Role of Symmetry.非线性网络的可观测性与可控性:对称性的作用。
Phys Rev X. 2015 Jan-Mar;5(1). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011005. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
2
Networkcontrology.网络控制学
Chaos. 2015 Sep;25(9):097621. doi: 10.1063/1.4931570.
3
Evolution and Controllability of Cancer Networks: A Boolean Perspective.癌症网络的演化与可控性:布尔视角
布尔网络的全局稳定性及其在生物分子网络控制中的应用
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97684-y.
4
Hyperedge overlap drives explosive transitions in systems with higher-order interactions.超边重叠驱动具有高阶相互作用的系统中的爆发性转变。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 9;16(1):555. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55506-1.
5
Control of complex systems with generalized embedding and empirical dynamic modeling.基于广义嵌入和经验动态建模的复杂系统控制
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0305408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305408. eCollection 2024.
6
The distance backbone of complex networks.复杂网络的距离主干
J Complex Netw. 2021 Dec;9(6). doi: 10.1093/comnet/cnab021. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
7
The distance backbone of directed networks.有向网络的距离主干
Complex Netw Appl XI (2023). 2023;1078:135-147. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-21131-7_11. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
8
Orders between Channels and Implications for Partial Information Decomposition.通道间的次序关系及其对部分信息分解的影响
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jun 25;25(7):975. doi: 10.3390/e25070975.
9
Statistical control of structural networks with limited interventions to minimize cellular phenotypic diversity represented by point attractors.通过有限的干预来控制结构网络的统计,以最小化表现为吸引子的点的细胞表型多样性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 18;13(1):6275. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33346-1.
10
The nonlinearity of regulation in biological networks.生物网络调控的非线性。
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2023 Apr 4;9(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41540-023-00273-w.
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2014 Jan-Feb;11(1):83-94. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2013.128.
4
Diversified Control Paths: A Significant Way Disease Genes Perturb the Human Regulatory Network.多样化的调控路径:疾病基因扰动人类调控网络的重要方式。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 18;10(8):e0135491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135491. eCollection 2015.
5
Controllability analysis of transcriptional regulatory networks reveals circular control patterns among transcription factors.转录调控网络的可控性分析揭示了转录因子之间的循环控制模式。
Integr Biol (Camb). 2015 May;7(5):560-8. doi: 10.1039/c4ib00247d. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
6
Cell fate reprogramming by control of intracellular network dynamics.通过控制细胞内网络动力学实现细胞命运重编程。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Apr 7;11(4):e1004193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004193. eCollection 2015 Apr.
7
Controllability and observability of Boolean networks arising from biology.源自生物学的布尔网络的可控性与可观测性
Chaos. 2015 Feb;25(2):023104. doi: 10.1063/1.4907708.
8
Computing smallest intervention strategies for multiple metabolic networks in a boolean model.在布尔模型中计算多个代谢网络的最小干预策略。
J Comput Biol. 2015 Feb;22(2):85-110. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2014.0274.
9
Controllability transition and nonlocality in network control.网络控制中的可控性转变与非局域性
Phys Rev Lett. 2013 May 17;110(20):208701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.208701. Epub 2013 May 14.
10
Symmetry in critical random Boolean network dynamics.临界随机布尔网络动力学中的对称性。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Apr;89(4):042808. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042808. Epub 2014 Apr 16.