• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人际特质的结构:威金斯的环形模型与五因素模型

The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model.

作者信息

McCrae R R, Costa P T

机构信息

Gerontology Research Center, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland 21224.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Apr;56(4):586-95. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.4.586.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.56.4.586
PMID:2709308
Abstract

Using a sample of 315 adult men and women, self-reports on Wiggins's revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales were jointly factored with self-reports, peer ratings, and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory to examine the relations between the two models. Results suggest that the interpersonal circumplex is defined by the two dimensions of Extraversion and Agreeableness, and that the circular ordering of variables is not an artifact of response biases or cognitive schemata. Circumplex and dimensional models appear to complement each other in describing the structure of personality, and both may be useful to social psychologists in understanding interpersonal behavior.

摘要

以315名成年男性和女性为样本,对威金斯修订的人际形容词量表的自我报告与对大五人格量表的自我报告、同伴评分和配偶评分进行联合因素分析,以检验这两种模型之间的关系。结果表明,人际环形模型由外向性和宜人性两个维度定义,变量的环形排序不是反应偏差或认知图式的人为产物。环形模型和维度模型在描述人格结构方面似乎相互补充,两者对社会心理学家理解人际行为可能都有用。

相似文献

1
The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model.人际特质的结构:威金斯的环形模型与五因素模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Apr;56(4):586-95. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.4.586.
2
Assessment of social traits in married couples: Self-reports versus spouse ratings around the interpersonal circumplex.已婚夫妇社会特质评估:围绕人际环状模型的自我报告与配偶评分
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jun;28(6):726-36. doi: 10.1037/pas0000226. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
3
Relationships among three general approaches to personality description.人格描述的三种一般方法之间的关系。
J Psychol. 1995 Sep;129(5):565-81. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1995.9914929.
4
A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC.简要评估人际关系的双相模型:IPIP-IPC。
Assessment. 2009 Dec;16(4):352-61. doi: 10.1177/1073191109340382. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
5
Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation.统一大五人格、人际关系双元模型和特质关联。
J Pers. 2013 Oct;81(5):465-75. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12020. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
6
Assessing the interpersonal circumplex model in late childhood: the interpersonal behavior questionnaire for children.评估儿童后期人际双相模型:儿童人际行为问卷。
Assessment. 2012 Dec;19(4):421-41. doi: 10.1177/1073191111401172. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
7
Mortality Risk Associated With Personality Facets of the Big Five and Interpersonal Circumplex Across Three Aging Cohorts.与五大人格特质和人际双相情感维度的人格特质相关的死亡风险横跨三个老龄化队列。
Psychosom Med. 2020 Jan;82(1):64-73. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000756.
8
A circumplex model of interpersonal attributes in middle childhood.童年中期人际属性的环形模型。
J Pers. 2007 Aug;75(4):863-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00459.x.
9
Evaluating Circumplex Structure in the Interpersonal Scales for the NEO-PI-3.评估 NEO-PI-3 人格量表中的人际关系量表的环型结构。
Assessment. 2018 Jul;25(5):589-595. doi: 10.1177/1073191116665697. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
10
Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders.人际价值观的环形量表:信度、效度及其在人际问题和人格障碍中的适用性
J Pers Assess. 2000 Oct;75(2):249-67. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_6.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrastive functional connectivity defines neurophysiology-informed symptom dimensions in major depression.对比性功能连接定义了重度抑郁症中基于神经生理学的症状维度。
Cell Rep Med. 2025 Jun 17;6(6):102151. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102151. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Are individual differences in personality associated with COVID-19 infection? Examining the role of normative, maladaptive, and dark personality traits using structural equation modeling.人格特质的个体差异与新冠病毒感染有关吗?使用结构方程模型研究规范性、适应不良和黑暗人格特质的作用。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 19;16:1511970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1511970. eCollection 2025.
3
Ready for What's Next? The Associations Between Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Skills and Career Adaptability in High School Students.
为未来做好准备?高中生的社交、情感和行为技能与职业适应性之间的关联
J Adolesc. 2025 Jul;97(5):1200-1210. doi: 10.1002/jad.12486. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
4
The psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja personality questionnaire.祖克曼-库尔曼-阿卢亚人格问卷泰语版的心理测量特性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85824-3.
5
Aggression and the Big Five Personality Factors Among Fitness Practitioners and Pre-Workout Consumers.健身从业者和运动前补剂消费者的攻击性与大五人格因素
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;14(12):1131. doi: 10.3390/bs14121131.
6
Modeling interpersonal perception in dyadic interactions: towards robot-assisted social mediation in the real world.二元互动中的人际感知建模:迈向现实世界中的机器人辅助社会调解
Front Robot AI. 2024 Nov 28;11:1410957. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1410957. eCollection 2024.
7
Contrastive Functional Connectivity Defines Neurophysiology-informed Symptom Dimensions in Major Depression.对比性功能连接定义了重度抑郁症中基于神经生理学的症状维度。
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 7:2024.10.04.616707. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.04.616707.
8
Different personality factors drive work and non-work creativity.不同的人格因素驱动着工作和非工作方面的创造力。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1078874. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078874. eCollection 2023.
9
Psychometric evaluation of a Visual Interpersonal Analog Scale.视觉人际类比量表的心理计量学评估。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Apr;35(4):311-324. doi: 10.1037/pas0001210. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
10
Parents' personality, parenting stress, and problem behaviors of children with special needs in China before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情之前及期间中国特殊需求儿童家长的性格、育儿压力及问题行为
Curr Psychol. 2022 Oct 19:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03869-3.