Toma Vlad Al, Farcaș Anca D, Roman Ioana, Sevastre Bogdan, Hathazi Denisa, Scurtu Florina, Damian Grigore, Silaghi-Dumitrescu Radu
Biological Research Institute, Cluj Napoca, 400113, Romania.
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, 400028, Romania.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 20;11(4):e0153909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153909. eCollection 2016.
A series of hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier candidates (HBOC), previously noted for their differences in prooxidative and physiological reactivity, were compared in terms of the negative effects displayed upon injection in Wistar rats. At the concentrations tested, antioxidant strategies based on albumin as well as based on rubrerythrin appear to offer observable physiological advantages.
一系列基于血红蛋白的氧载体候选物(HBOC),此前因其促氧化和生理反应性的差异而受到关注,对它们在注射到Wistar大鼠体内时所表现出的负面影响进行了比较。在所测试的浓度下,基于白蛋白以及基于红氧还蛋白的抗氧化策略似乎具有明显的生理优势。