• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A test of safety, violence prevention, and civility climate domain-specific relationships with relevant workplace hazards.一项关于安全、暴力预防以及文明氛围领域与相关工作场所危害之间特定关系的测试。
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2016 Jan;22(1):45-51. doi: 10.1080/10773525.2016.1144374. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
2
Digging deeper into the shared variance among safety-related climates: the need for a general safety climate measure.深入探究安全相关氛围之间的共同方差:对通用安全氛围测量方法的需求。
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2018 Jan-Apr;24(1-2):38-46. doi: 10.1080/10773525.2018.1507867. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
3
Civility norms, safety climate, and safety outcomes: a preliminary investigation.文明规范、安全氛围与安全成果:一项初步调查。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2014 Oct;19(4):437-52. doi: 10.1037/a0037110. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
4
Relationships between psychological safety climate facets and safety behavior in the rail industry: a dominance analysis.铁路行业心理安全氛围各方面与安全行为之间的关系:优势分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Sep;42(5):1460-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.011. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
5
Relationships among Safety Climate, Safety Behavior, and Safety Outcomes for Ethnic Minority Construction Workers.少数民族建筑工人的安全氛围、安全行为与安全结果之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 9;15(3):484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030484.
6
The importance of organizational climate for psychosocial safety in the prevention of sexual harassment at work.组织氛围对工作场所预防性骚扰中社会心理安全的重要性。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12192. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12192.
7
Safety climate and culture: Integrating psychological and systems perspectives.安全氛围与文化:整合心理学与系统视角
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):341-353. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000072. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
8
Can Civility Norms Boost Positive Effects of Management Commitment to Safety?文明规范能否增强管理层对安全承诺的积极影响?
J Psychol. 2016 Jul 3;150(5):591-605. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2016.1143798. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
9
The effect on employees of violence climate in the workplace.工作场所暴力氛围对员工的影响。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:3026-31. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0559-3026.
10
A structural equation modelling approach examining the pathways between safety climate, behaviour performance and workplace slipping.一种结构方程建模方法,用于研究安全氛围、行为表现与工作场所滑倒之间的路径。
Occup Environ Med. 2015 Jul;72(7):476-81. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102496. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing Workplace Civility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of definitions, measurements, and associated factors.促进职场文明:对定义、测量方法及相关因素的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 9;14:1277188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277188. eCollection 2023.
2
Registered Nurses' Experiences With Incivility During the Early Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a Multi-State Survey.注册护士在 COVID-19 大流行早期遭遇不文明行为的经历:一项多州调查的结果。
Workplace Health Saf. 2022 Mar;70(3):148-160. doi: 10.1177/21650799211024867. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
Effects of a Workplace Violence Intervention on Hospital Employee Perceptions of Organizational Safety.工作场所暴力干预对医院员工组织安全感知的影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Dec;62(12):e716-e724. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002036.
4
Digging deeper into the shared variance among safety-related climates: the need for a general safety climate measure.深入探究安全相关氛围之间的共同方差:对通用安全氛围测量方法的需求。
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2018 Jan-Apr;24(1-2):38-46. doi: 10.1080/10773525.2018.1507867. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
A Heuristic Method for Estimating the Relative Weight of Predictor Variables in Multiple Regression.一种估计多元回归中预测变量相对权重的启发式方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2000 Jan 1;35(1):1-19. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1.
2
Psychosocial precursors and physical consequences of workplace violence towards nurses: a longitudinal examination with naturally occurring groups in hospital settings.护士遭受工作场所暴力的心理社会前因和身体后果:医院环境中自然群体的纵向考察。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Sep;49(9):1091-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
3
Exposure to Psychological Aggression at Work and Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Job Attitudes and Personal Health.工作中遭受心理攻击与工作绩效:工作态度和个人健康的中介作用。
Work Stress. 2011 Jan 1;25(1):23-40. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2011.563133.
4
Work and nonwork outcomes of workplace incivility: Does family support help?工作场所粗言秽语的工作和非工作结果:家庭支持有帮助吗?
J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;16(1):95-111. doi: 10.1037/a0021726.
5
Safety climate and injuries: an examination of theoretical and empirical relationships.安全氛围与伤害:理论与实证关系的探讨。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jul;95(4):713-27. doi: 10.1037/a0019164.
6
A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels.一项关于个体和群体层面安全氛围、安全动机、安全行为与事故之间滞后关系的研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):946-53. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946.
7
Identification of violence in Turkish health care settings.土耳其医疗环境中暴力行为的识别。
J Interpers Violence. 2006 Feb;21(2):276-96. doi: 10.1177/0886260505282565.
8
A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates.安全氛围的多层次模型:组织层面与团队层面氛围的跨层次关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jul;90(4):616-28. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616.
9
Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms.用于分析肌肉骨骼症状的标准化北欧问卷。
Appl Ergon. 1987 Sep;18(3):233-7. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x.
10
A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs.安全氛围的群体层面模型:检验群体氛围对制造业工作中微事故的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Aug;85(4):587-96. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587.

一项关于安全、暴力预防以及文明氛围领域与相关工作场所危害之间特定关系的测试。

A test of safety, violence prevention, and civility climate domain-specific relationships with relevant workplace hazards.

作者信息

Gazica Michele W, Spector Paul E

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of South Florida , Tampa , FL , USA.

出版信息

Int J Occup Environ Health. 2016 Jan;22(1):45-51. doi: 10.1080/10773525.2016.1144374. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1080/10773525.2016.1144374
PMID:27110930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4894276/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Safety climate, violence prevention climate, and civility climate were independently developed and linked to domain-specific workplace hazards, although all three were designed to promote the physical and psychological safety of workers.

PURPOSE

To test domain specificity between conceptually related workplace climates and relevant workplace hazards.

METHODS

Data were collected from 368 persons employed in various industries and descriptive statistics were calculated for all study variables. Correlational and relative weights analyses were used to test for domain specificity.

RESULTS

The three climate domains were similarly predictive of most workplace hazards, regardless of domain specificity.

DISCUSSION

This study suggests that the three climate domains share a common higher order construct that may predict relevant workplace hazards better than any of the scales alone.

摘要

背景

安全氛围、暴力预防氛围和文明氛围是各自独立形成的,并且与特定领域的工作场所危害相关联,尽管这三者都是为促进工人的身体和心理安全而设计的。

目的

检验概念上相关的工作场所氛围与相关工作场所危害之间的领域特异性。

方法

收集了来自不同行业的368名员工的数据,并对所有研究变量进行了描述性统计。使用相关性分析和相对权重分析来检验领域特异性。

结果

无论领域特异性如何,这三个氛围领域对大多数工作场所危害的预测作用相似。

讨论

本研究表明,这三个氛围领域共享一个共同的高阶结构,该结构可能比任何一个单独的量表更能预测相关的工作场所危害。