Mutters N T, Günther F, Frank U, Mischnik A
Department of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Jun;93(2):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are an economic burden, and infection control (IC) measures are cost- and labour-intensive. A two-tier IC management strategy was developed, including active screening, in order to achieve effective use of limited resources. Briefly, high-risk patients were differentiated from other patients, distinguished according to type of MDRO, and IC measures were implemented accordingly.
To evaluate costs and benefits of this IC management strategy.
The study period comprised 2.5 years. All high-risk patients underwent microbiological screening. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR). Expenses consisted of costs for staff, materials, laboratory, increased workload and occupational costs.
In total, 39,551 patients were screened, accounting for 24.5% of all admissions. Of all screened patients, 7.8% (N=3,104) were MDRO positive; these patients were mainly colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (37.3%), followed by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (30.3%) and MDR-GNB (28.3%). The median length of stay (LOS) for all patients was 10 days (interquartile range 3-20); LOS was twice as long in colonized patients (P<0.001). Screening costs totalled 255,093.82€, IC measures cost 97,701.36€, and opportunity costs were 599,225.52€. The savings of this IC management strategy totalled 500,941.84€. Possible transmissions by undetected carriers would have caused additional costs of 613,648.90-4,974,939.26€ (i.e. approximately 600,000-5 million €).
Although the costs of a two-tier IC management strategy including active microbiological screening are not trivial, these data indicate that the approach is cost-effective when prevented transmissions are included in the cost estimate.
多重耐药菌(MDROs)是一种经济负担,而感染控制(IC)措施成本高且耗费人力。为有效利用有限资源,制定了一种包括主动筛查的两级IC管理策略。简而言之,根据MDRO类型将高危患者与其他患者区分开来,并相应地实施IC措施。
评估这种IC管理策略的成本和效益。
研究期为2.5年。所有高危患者均接受微生物筛查。革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)被分类为多重耐药(MDR)和广泛耐药(XDR)。费用包括人员、材料、实验室、工作量增加和职业成本。
总共筛查了39551名患者,占所有入院患者的24.5%。在所有筛查患者中,7.8%(n = 3104)为MDRO阳性;这些患者主要携带耐万古霉素肠球菌(37.3%),其次是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(30.3%)和MDR - GNB(28.3%)。所有患者的中位住院时间(LOS)为10天(四分位间距3 - 20);定植患者的住院时间是其两倍(P < 0.001)。筛查成本总计255093.82欧元,IC措施成本为97701.36欧元,机会成本为599225.52欧元。这种IC管理策略的节省总计500941.84欧元。未检测到的携带者可能导致的传播将造成613648.90 - 4974939.26欧元的额外成本(即约60万 - 500万欧元)。
尽管包括主动微生物筛查的两级IC管理策略成本不菲,但这些数据表明,当在成本估算中纳入预防传播时,该方法具有成本效益。