All health researchers should begin their training by preparing at least one systematic review.
作者信息
Mahtani Kamal R
机构信息
Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 2016 Jul;109(7):264-8. doi: 10.1177/0141076816643954. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
All health researchers should begin their training by preparing at least one systematic review.所有健康领域的研究人员都应通过至少准备一篇系统综述来开启他们的培训。
J R Soc Med. 2016 Jul;109(7):264-8. doi: 10.1177/0141076816643954. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis as a support tools for research and clinical practice.系统评价和荟萃分析作为研究和临床实践的支持工具。
Rev Alerg Mex. 2020 Jan-Mar;67(1):62-72. doi: 10.29262/ram.v67i1.733.
3
Undertaking a systematic review and meta-analysis for a scholarly project: an updated practical guide.为学术项目开展系统评价和荟萃分析：最新实用指南。
Australas Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;28(1):106-111. doi: 10.1177/1039856219875063. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
Teaching Lifelong Research Skills in Residency: Implementation and Outcome of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Course.在住院医师培训中教授终身研究技能：系统评价与荟萃分析课程的实施与成果
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Sep;7(3):445-50. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00505.1.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Additional considerations are required when preparing a protocol for a systematic review with multiple interventions.在为包含多个干预措施的系统评价制定方案时，需要考虑更多因素。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;83:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.015. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
7
What are the effects of teaching Evidence-Based Health Care (EBHC) at different levels of health professions education? An updated overview of systematic reviews.不同层次的卫生专业教育中教授循证健康保健（EBHC）的效果如何？系统评价的更新概述。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254191. eCollection 2021.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical research: the need for reporting guidelines.系统评价和临床前研究的荟萃分析：需要报告指南。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Oct;32(19):2340.
9
Cochrane systematic reviews: contributions and perspectives.考克兰系统评价：贡献与观点。
Joint Bone Spine. 2019 May;86(3):289-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
10
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA).系统评价诊断准确性研究报告的改进步骤：诊断准确性系统评价和 Meta 分析的首选报告项目（PRISMA-DTA）。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 11;8(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1090-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Inclusion, characteristics and methodological limitations of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross-sectional study of all universities in Sweden.博士论文中系统评价的纳入标准、特征及方法学局限性：瑞典所有大学的横断面研究
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Jan 9;3(1):e70015. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70015. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Structural under-reporting of informed consent, data handling and sharing, ethical approval, and application of Open Science principles as proxies for study quality conduct in COVID-19 research: a systematic scoping review.结构信息缺失，包括知情同意、数据处理和共享、伦理审批，以及开放科学原则在 COVID-19 研究中作为研究质量行为的替代指标：系统范围审查。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012007.
3
Angry scientists, angry analysts and angry novelists.愤怒的科学家、愤怒的分析师和愤怒的小说家。
Diabetologia. 2023 Aug;66(8):1580-1583. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-05917-4. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
Accuracy of Smartphone Camera Applications for Detecting Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.智能手机相机应用程序检测心房颤动的准确性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202064. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2064.
5
Acceptance of a systematic review as a thesis: survey of biomedical doctoral programs in Europe.接受系统评价作为论文：对欧洲生物医学博士课程的调查。
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 12;6(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0653-x.
本文引用的文献
1
Using systematic reviews to inform NIHR HTA trial planning and design: a retrospective cohort.利用系统评价为英国国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估试验的规划和设计提供信息：一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Dec 29;15:108. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0102-2.
2
How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set.如何在设定研究重点时增加价值和减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
3
Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste.生物医学研究：提高价值，减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):101-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
4
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review.CONSORT 声明的使用是否会影响医学期刊发表的随机对照试验报告的完整性？一项 Cochrane 综述。
Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 29;1:60. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-60.
5
Rosiglitazone: what went wrong?罗格列酮：问题出在哪里？
BMJ. 2010 Sep 6;341:c4848. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4848.
6
Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting.临床试验应以对相关证据的系统评价为起点和终点：12年了，还在等待。
Lancet. 2010 Jul 3;376(9734):20-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61045-8.
7
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.研究证据生产与报告中的可避免浪费。
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):86-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
8
Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth.产前使用糖皮质激素促进早产风险女性胎儿肺成熟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD004454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub2.
9
Infant sleeping position and the sudden infant death syndrome: systematic review of observational studies and historical review of recommendations from 1940 to 2002.婴儿睡眠姿势与婴儿猝死综合征：观察性研究的系统评价及1940年至2002年建议的历史回顾
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;34(4):874-87. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi088. Epub 2005 Apr 20.
10
Risk of cardiovascular events and rofecoxib: cumulative meta-analysis.心血管事件风险与罗非昔布：累积荟萃分析
Lancet. 2004;364(9450):2021-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17514-4.
Zotero 插件