Suppr超能文献

Pulsair非接触眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。

Comparison of the Pulsair noncontact tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

作者信息

Climenhaga H, Plucinska H

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alberta, Edmonton.

出版信息

Can J Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;24(1):7-9.

PMID:2713754
Abstract

We measured the intraocular pressure (IOP) in 100 consecutive new patients (200 eyes) with the Pulsair noncontact tonometer and with the Goldmann applanation tonometer. The correlation coefficient between the two instruments was 0.76 for the first eye tested and 0.90 for the second eye tested. The Pulsair noncontact tonometer may be useful for screening patients presumed to have normal IOP if an appropriately low IOP value is used to indicate the need for further assessment. The calibration of the instrument could be improved.

摘要

我们使用Pulsair非接触眼压计和Goldmann压平眼压计,对连续的100例新患者(200只眼)测量了眼压。两种仪器测量的第一只眼的相关系数为0.76,第二只眼的相关系数为0.90。如果使用适当低的眼压值来表明需要进一步评估,Pulsair非接触眼压计可能有助于筛查推测眼压正常的患者。该仪器的校准可以改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验