• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2004年至2014年期间,美国总统防治艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)在治理和卫生系统方面的投资占各国预算资金的五分之一。

PEPFAR Investments In Governance And Health Systems Were One-Fifth Of Countries' Budgeted Funds, 2004-14.

作者信息

Moucheraud Corrina, Sparkes Susan, Nakamura Yoriko, Gage Anna, Atun Rifat, Bossert Thomas J

机构信息

Corrina Moucheraud (

Susan Sparkes is a health economist in the Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing at the World Health Organization, in Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 May 1;35(5):847-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1445.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1445
PMID:27140991
Abstract

Launched in 2003, the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) is the largest disease-focused assistance program in the world. We analyzed PEPFAR budgets for governance and systems for the period 2004-14 to ascertain whether PEPFAR's stated emphasis on strengthening health systems has been manifested financially. The main outcome variable in our analysis, the first of its kind using these data, was the share of PEPFAR's total annual budget for a country that was designated for governance and systems. The share of planned PEPFAR funding for governance and systems increased from 14.9 percent, on average, in 2004 to 27.5 percent in 2013, but it declined in 2014 to 20.8 percent. This study shows that the size of a country's PEPFAR budget was negatively associated with the share allocated for governance and systems (compared with other budget program areas); it also shows that there was no significant relationship between budgets for governance and systems and HIV prevalence. It is crucial for the global health policy community to better understand how such investments are allocated and used for health systems strengthening.

摘要

美国总统防治艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)于2003年启动,是全球最大的针对特定疾病的援助项目。我们分析了2004年至2014年期间PEPFAR用于治理和系统建设的预算,以确定PEPFAR所宣称的对加强卫生系统的重视在财政上是否得到体现。我们的分析中主要的结果变量(首次使用这些数据)是PEPFAR在一个国家年度总预算中指定用于治理和系统建设的份额。PEPFAR计划用于治理和系统建设的资金份额从2004年的平均14.9%增至2013年的27.5%,但在2014年降至20.8%。这项研究表明,一个国家的PEPFAR预算规模与分配给治理和系统建设的份额(与其他预算项目领域相比)呈负相关;研究还表明,治理和系统建设预算与艾滋病毒流行率之间没有显著关系。全球卫生政策界更好地了解此类投资如何分配以及如何用于加强卫生系统至关重要。

相似文献

1
PEPFAR Investments In Governance And Health Systems Were One-Fifth Of Countries' Budgeted Funds, 2004-14.2004年至2014年期间,美国总统防治艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)在治理和卫生系统方面的投资占各国预算资金的五分之一。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 May 1;35(5):847-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1445.
2
The impact of the US president's emergency plan for AIDS relief (PEPFAR) HIV and AIDS program on the Nigerian health system.美国总统艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)的艾滋病毒与艾滋病项目对尼日利亚卫生系统的影响。
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Nov 11;25:143. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.143.9987. eCollection 2016.
3
PEPFAR Funding Associated With An Increase In Employment Among Males in Ten Sub-Saharan African Countries.美国总统艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)的资金与撒哈拉以南非洲十个国家男性就业人数的增加有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jun;34(6):946-53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1006.
4
The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and adult mortality: A replication study of HIV development assistance effects in Sub-Saharan African countries.总统艾滋病紧急救援计划与成人死亡率:对撒哈拉以南非洲国家 HIV 发展援助效果的复制研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 26;15(10):e0233948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233948. eCollection 2020.
5
Global Fund contributions to health security in ten countries, 2014-20: mapping synergies between vertical disease programmes and capacities for preventing, detecting, and responding to public health emergencies.全球基金对十个国家卫生安全的贡献,2014-20 年:绘制垂直疾病规划与预防、检测和应对公共卫生突发事件能力之间的协同关系图。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e181-e188. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30420-4.
6
The effectiveness of PEPFAR's funding for women and children with HIV/AIDS.美国总统艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)对感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的妇女和儿童的资助成效。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):e896-e916. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2706. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
7
Current allocations and target apportionment for HIV testing and treatment services for marginalized populations: characterizing PEPFAR investment and strategy.针对边缘化人群的艾滋病毒检测和治疗服务的当前分配及目标分配:描述总统紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)的投资与策略
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Jul;24 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e25753. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25753.
8
Potential impact of the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS relief on the tuberculosis/HIV coepidemic in selected Sub-Saharan African countries.美国总统艾滋病紧急救援计划对选定撒哈拉以南非洲国家结核/艾滋病毒共流行的潜在影响。
J Infect Dis. 2013 Dec 15;208(12):2075-84. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit406. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
9
Countries where HIV is concentrated among most-at-risk populations get disproportionally lower funding from PEPFAR.在艾滋病毒主要集中在高危人群的国家,从 PEPFAR 获得的资金不成比例地减少。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jul;31(7):1519-28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0216.
10
Ghana's HIV epidemic and PEPFAR's contribution towards epidemic control.加纳的艾滋病疫情以及总统紧急救援计划对疫情控制的贡献。
Ghana Med J. 2019 Mar;53(1):59-62. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v53i1.9.

引用本文的文献

1
Financing health system elements in Africa: A scoping review.非洲卫生系统要素筹资:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0291371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291371. eCollection 2023.
2
Assessing sustainment of health worker outcomes beyond program end: Evaluation results from an infant and young child feeding intervention in Bangladesh.评估项目结束后卫生工作者成果的可持续性:孟加拉国婴幼儿喂养干预措施的评估结果
Front Health Serv. 2023 Jan 9;2:1005986. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1005986. eCollection 2022.
3
The impact of loss of PEPFAR support on HIV services at health facilities in low-burden districts in Uganda.
乌干达低负担地区医疗机构中总统紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)支持的丧失对艾滋病服务的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06316-4.
4
Global costs, health benefits, and economic benefits of scaling up treatment and imaging modalities for survival of 11 cancers: a simulation-based analysis.全球范围内提升 11 种癌症生存率的治疗和影像手段扩大化的成本、健康收益和经济效益:基于模拟的分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Mar;22(3):341-350. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30750-6.
5
Can complex programs be sustained? A mixed methods sustainability evaluation of a national infant and young child feeding program in Bangladesh and Vietnam.复杂的项目能否持续?对孟加拉国和越南一项全国婴幼儿喂养项目的混合方法可持续性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 4;20(1):1361. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09438-2.
6
Questions for future evidence-informed policy initiatives: insights from the evolution and aspirations of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups.未来基于证据的政策举措的问题:来自国家免疫技术咨询小组的演变与期望的见解
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Apr 22;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00551-7.
7
'Blood pressure can kill you tomorrow, but HIV gives you time': illness perceptions and treatment experiences among Malawian individuals living with HIV and hypertension.“血压可能明天就会要了你的命,但 HIV 能给你时间”:马拉维艾滋病毒感染者和高血压患者的疾病认知和治疗体验。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Nov 1;34(Supplement_2):ii36-ii44. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz112.
8
Sector-wide or disease-specific? Implications of trends in development assistance for health for the SDG era.全部门或特定疾病?卫生发展援助趋势对可持续发展目标时代的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Apr 1;33(3):381-391. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx181.