• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interactive use of online health resources: a comparison of consumer and professional questions.在线健康资源的交互使用:消费者问题与专业问题的比较
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jul;23(4):802-11. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw024. Epub 2016 May 4.
2
SimQ: real-time retrieval of similar consumer health questions.SimQ:相似消费者健康问题的实时检索
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 17;17(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3388.
3
Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.流量来源以及访客对在线质量公开报告的偏好:网络分析与在线调查结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 1;17(5):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3637.
4
Dr Google Is Here to Stay but Health Care Professionals Are Still Valued: An Analysis of Health Care Consumers' Internet Navigation Support Preferences.“谷歌医生”将持续存在,但医疗保健专业人员仍受重视:对医疗保健消费者互联网导航支持偏好的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 14;19(6):e210. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7489.
5
Toward automated consumer question answering: automatically separating consumer questions from professional questions in the healthcare domain.迈向自动化消费者问答:在医疗保健领域自动区分消费者问题和专业问题。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Dec;44(6):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
6
Dr Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions.谷歌医生与消费者:一项定性研究,探索慢性病患者的导航需求及在线健康信息寻求行为
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 2;16(12):e262. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3706.
7
Health information-seeking behavior of seniors who use the Internet: a survey.使用互联网的老年人的健康信息寻求行为:一项调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 8;17(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3749.
8
Answers to Health Questions: Internet Search Results Versus Online Health Community Responses.健康问题的答案:互联网搜索结果与在线健康社区的回复
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 28;18(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5369.
9
A content analysis of the consumer-facing online information about My Health Record: Implications for increasing knowledge and awareness to facilitate uptake and use.对面向消费者的 My Health Record 在线信息进行内容分析:提高知识和认识水平以促进采用和使用的意义。
Health Inf Manag. 2018 Sep;47(3):106-115. doi: 10.1177/1833358317712200. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
10
Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators.消费者对在线健康信息质量的评估:相关标准和指标的系统文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 2;21(5):e12522. doi: 10.2196/12522.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic classification of Indonesian consumer health questions.印度尼西亚消费者健康问题的语义分类。
J Biomed Semantics. 2025 Jul 28;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13326-025-00334-5.
2
Identifying Medical Concepts and Semantic Types in Lay Vocabularies of Health Consumers Who are Concerned with Diabetes on Social Media Using the UMLS and NLP.使用统一医学语言系统(UMLS)和自然语言处理(NLP)在社交媒体上关注糖尿病的健康消费者的日常词汇中识别医学概念和语义类型。
Proc COMPSAC. 2024 Jul;2024:862-869. doi: 10.1109/compsac61105.2024.00119. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Quality Measurement of Consumer Health Questions: Content and Language Perspectives.消费者健康问题的质量衡量:内容和语言视角。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 12;26:e48257. doi: 10.2196/48257.
4
Exploring the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Summarizing Mental Health Counseling Sessions: Benchmark Study.探讨大型语言模型在总结心理健康咨询会话中的功效:基准研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jul 23;11:e57306. doi: 10.2196/57306.
5
A conversational agent system for dietary supplements use.膳食补充剂使用的会话代理系统。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 7;22(Suppl 1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01888-5.
6
What Would it Take to get Biomedical QA Systems into Practice?如何将生物医学问答系统付诸实践?
Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process. 2021 Nov;2021:28-41. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.mrqa-1.3.
7
The Unified Medical Language System SPECIALIST Lexicon and Lexical Tools: Development and applications.统一医学语言系统专家词典及词汇工具:开发与应用
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 29;27(10):1600-5. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa056.
8
Multidimensional Feature Classification of the Health Information Needs of Patients With Hypertension in an Online Health Community Through Analysis of 1000 Patient Question Records: Observational Study.通过分析1000条患者问题记录对在线健康社区中高血压患者健康信息需求进行多维特征分类:观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 29;22(5):e17349. doi: 10.2196/17349.
9
A question-entailment approach to question answering.问题蕴涵方法在问答中的应用。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Oct 22;20(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3119-4.
10
Consumer health information and question answering: helping consumers find answers to their health-related information needs.消费者健康信息与问答:帮助消费者寻找与其健康相关的信息需求的答案。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):194-201. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz152.

本文引用的文献

1
An Ensemble Method for Spelling Correction in Consumer Health Questions.一种用于消费者健康问题拼写纠正的集成方法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:727-36. eCollection 2015.
2
Automatically classifying question types for consumer health questions.自动对消费者健康问题的问题类型进行分类。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:1018-27. eCollection 2014.
3
SimQ: real-time retrieval of similar consumer health questions.SimQ:相似消费者健康问题的实时检索
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 17;17(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3388.
4
Clinical questions raised by clinicians at the point of care: a systematic review.临床医生在护理点提出的临床问题:系统评价。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):710-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.368.
5
From health search to healthcare: explorations of intention and utilization via query logs and user surveys.从健康搜索到医疗保健:通过查询日志和用户调查探索意图和利用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):49-55. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001473. Epub 2013 May 11.
6
Internet health information seeking is a team sport: analysis of the Pew Internet Survey.网络健康信息搜索是一项团体运动:皮尤互联网调查分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Mar;82(3):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
7
Toward automated consumer question answering: automatically separating consumer questions from professional questions in the healthcare domain.迈向自动化消费者问答:在医疗保健领域自动区分消费者问题和专业问题。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Dec;44(6):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
8
A new readability yardstick.一种新的可读性衡量标准。
J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):221-33. doi: 10.1037/h0057532.
9
Using wireless handheld computers to seek information at the point of care: an evaluation by clinicians.使用无线手持计算机在护理点获取信息:临床医生的一项评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):807-15. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2424. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
10
Exploring and developing consumer health vocabularies.探索和开发消费者健康词汇表。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):24-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1761. Epub 2005 Oct 12.

在线健康资源的交互使用:消费者问题与专业问题的比较

Interactive use of online health resources: a comparison of consumer and professional questions.

作者信息

Roberts Kirk, Demner-Fushman Dina

机构信息

Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health 8600 Rockville Pike, Building 38A/1003H Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA

Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health 8600 Rockville Pike, Building 38A/1003H Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jul;23(4):802-11. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw024. Epub 2016 May 4.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocw024
PMID:27147494
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4926747/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand how consumer questions on online resources differ from questions asked by professionals, and how such consumer questions differ across resources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten online question corpora, 5 consumer and 5 professional, with a combined total of over 40 000 questions, were analyzed using a variety of natural language processing techniques. These techniques analyze questions at the lexical, syntactic, and semantic levels, exposing differences in both form and content.

RESULTS

Consumer questions tend to be longer than professional questions, more closely resemble open-domain language, and focus far more on medical problems. Consumers ask more sub-questions, provide far more background information, and ask different types of questions than professionals. Furthermore, there is substantial variance of these factors between the different consumer corpora.

DISCUSSION

The form of consumer questions is highly dependent upon the individual online resource, especially in the amount of background information provided. Professionals, on the other hand, provide very little background information and often ask much shorter questions. The content of consumer questions is also highly dependent upon the resource. While professional questions commonly discuss treatments and tests, consumer questions focus disproportionately on symptoms and diseases. Further, consumers place far more emphasis on certain types of health problems (eg, sexual health).

CONCLUSION

Websites for consumers to submit health questions are a popular online resource filling important gaps in consumer health information. By analyzing how consumers write questions on these resources, we can better understand these gaps and create solutions for improving information access.This article is part of the Special Focus on Person-Generated Health and Wellness Data, which published in the May 2016 issue, Volume 23, Issue 3.

摘要

目的

了解消费者在网络资源上提出的问题与专业人士提出的问题有何不同,以及这些消费者问题在不同资源之间的差异。

材料与方法

使用多种自然语言处理技术对十个在线问题语料库进行分析,其中五个是消费者语料库,五个是专业人士语料库,总共包含超过40000个问题。这些技术在词汇、句法和语义层面分析问题,揭示形式和内容上的差异。

结果

消费者提出的问题往往比专业人士提出的问题更长,更类似于开放领域语言,并且更多地聚焦于医疗问题。与专业人士相比,消费者会提出更多子问题,提供更多背景信息,且提出不同类型的问题。此外,不同消费者语料库之间这些因素存在很大差异。

讨论

消费者问题的形式高度依赖于具体的在线资源,特别是所提供背景信息的数量。另一方面,专业人士提供的背景信息很少,并且通常提出的问题要短得多。消费者问题的内容也高度依赖于资源。专业问题通常讨论治疗和检查,而消费者问题则不成比例地聚焦于症状和疾病。此外,消费者更加重视某些类型的健康问题(例如性健康)。

结论

供消费者提交健康问题的网站是一种受欢迎的在线资源,填补了消费者健康信息方面的重要空白。通过分析消费者在这些资源上如何撰写问题,我们可以更好地理解这些空白,并创建改善信息获取的解决方案。本文是发表于2016年5月第23卷第3期的“个人生成的健康与 wellness 数据特别关注”的一部分。