Shokoohi Hamid, Armstrong Paige, Tansek Ryan
Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2015 Jan 5;7:1-9. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S50360. eCollection 2015.
Point-of-care ultrasound (US) has become a cornerstone in the diagnosis and treatment of patients in the emergency department (ED). Despite the beneficial impact on patient care, concern exists over repeat use of probes and the role as a vector for pathogen transmission. US probes are used for various applications, with the level of infection risk, based on the Spaulding Classification, ranging from noncritical with common practice to semicritical with endocavitary probes. To date, the most closely studied organisms are Staphylococcus aureus and human papilloma virus. Current evidence does confirm probe colonization but has not established a causative role in human infection. Based on current literature, US use during invasive procedures remains an infection control concern, but routine use on intact skin does not appear to cause significant risk to patients. Various barrier methods are available, each with indications based on extent of procedure and likelihood of contact with mucosal surfaces. Additionally, chemical cleansing methods have been shown to be effective in limiting probe contamination after use. New technologies utilizing ultraviolet light are available and effective but not widely used in the ED setting. As our understanding of the critical factors in US probe cleaning and disinfection improves, it is important to assess the challenges found in our current practice and to identify potential solutions to improve practices and procedures in infection control across the spectrum of US probe use in various applications in the ED. This article serves as a summary of the current literature available on infection control topics with the utilization of point-of-care US, and discusses challenges and potential solutions to improve the current practice of probe-related infection control.
床旁超声已成为急诊科患者诊断和治疗的基石。尽管对患者护理有有益影响,但对于探头的重复使用以及作为病原体传播载体的作用仍存在担忧。超声探头用于各种应用,根据斯波尔丁分类法,感染风险程度从常规使用的非关键到腔内探头的半关键不等。迄今为止,研究最深入的生物体是金黄色葡萄球菌和人乳头瘤病毒。目前的证据确实证实了探头定植,但尚未确定其在人类感染中的致病作用。根据现有文献,侵入性操作期间使用超声仍存在感染控制问题,但在完整皮肤上的常规使用似乎不会给患者带来重大风险。有多种屏障方法可供选择,每种方法都根据操作范围和与粘膜表面接触的可能性有相应的适用指征。此外,化学清洁方法已被证明在限制探头使用后的污染方面有效。利用紫外线的新技术可用且有效,但在急诊科环境中尚未广泛使用。随着我们对超声探头清洁和消毒关键因素的理解不断提高,评估当前实践中发现的挑战并确定潜在解决方案以改进急诊科各种应用中超声探头使用的感染控制实践和程序非常重要。本文总结了目前关于床旁超声感染控制主题的现有文献,并讨论了改进当前探头相关感染控制实践的挑战和潜在解决方案。