MacKisack Matthew, Aldworth Susan, Macpherson Fiona, Onians John, Winlove Crawford, Zeman Adam
University of Exeter Medical School Exeter, UK.
Artist-in-Residence, University of York York, UK.
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 19;7:515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00515. eCollection 2016.
The past 25 years have seen a rapid growth of knowledge about brain mechanisms involved in visual mental imagery. These advances have largely been made independently of the long history of philosophical - and even psychological - reckoning with imagery and its parent concept 'imagination'. We suggest that the view from these empirical findings can be widened by an appreciation of imagination's intellectual history, and we seek to show how that history both created the conditions for - and presents challenges to - the scientific endeavor. We focus on the neuroscientific literature's most commonly used task - imagining a concrete object - and, after sketching what is known of the neurobiological mechanisms involved, we examine the same basic act of imagining from the perspective of several key positions in the history of philosophy and psychology. We present positions that, firstly, contextualize and inform the neuroscientific account, and secondly, pose conceptual and methodological challenges to the scientific analysis of imagery. We conclude by reflecting on the intellectual history of visualization in the light of contemporary science, and the extent to which such science may resolve long-standing theoretical debates.
在过去25年里,人们对视觉心理意象所涉及的大脑机制的认识迅速增长。这些进展很大程度上是独立于对意象及其母体概念“想象”进行哲学乃至心理学思考的悠久历史而取得的。我们认为,通过了解想象的思想史,可以拓宽从这些实证研究结果中获得的视野,并且我们试图展示这段历史如何既为科学探索创造了条件,又给科学探索带来了挑战。我们聚焦于神经科学文献中最常用的任务——想象一个具体物体,在勾勒出已知的相关神经生物学机制后,我们从哲学和心理学史上的几个关键立场的角度审视同样的基本想象行为。我们呈现的立场,一方面为神经科学的解释提供背景并使其更具信息性,另一方面对意象的科学分析提出概念和方法上的挑战。我们通过根据当代科学反思视觉化的思想史,以及这种科学在多大程度上可以解决长期存在的理论争论来得出结论。