Suppr超能文献

中风康复研究中使用的上肢结局测量:系统文献综述

Upper Limb Outcome Measures Used in Stroke Rehabilitation Studies: A Systematic Literature Review.

作者信息

Santisteban Leire, Térémetz Maxime, Bleton Jean-Pierre, Baron Jean-Claude, Maier Marc A, Lindberg Påvel G

机构信息

Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Université Paris Descartes, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.

FR3636 CNRS, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 May 6;11(5):e0154792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154792. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Establishing which upper limb outcome measures are most commonly used in stroke studies may help in improving consensus among scientists and clinicians.

OBJECTIVE

In this study we aimed to identify the most commonly used upper limb outcome measures in intervention studies after stroke and to describe domains covered according to ICF, how measures are combined, and how their use varies geographically and over time.

METHODS

Pubmed, CinHAL, and PeDRO databases were searched for upper limb intervention studies in stroke according to PRISMA guidelines and477 studies were included.

RESULTS

In studies 48different outcome measures were found. Only 15 of these outcome measures were used in more than 5% of the studies. The Fugl-Meyer Test (FMT)was the most commonly used measure (in 36% of studies). Commonly used measures covered ICF domains of body function and activity to varying extents. Most studies (72%) combined multiple outcome measures: the FMT was often combined with the Motor Activity Log (MAL), the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test, but infrequently combined with the Motor Assessment Scale or the Nine Hole Peg Test. Key components of manual dexterity such as selective finger movements were rarely measured. Frequency of use increased over a twelve-year period for the FMT and for assessments of kinematics, whereas other measures, such as the MAL and the Jebsen Taylor Hand Test showed decreased use over time. Use varied largely between countries showing low international consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed a large diversity of outcome measures used across studies. However, a growing number of studies used the FMT, a neurological test with good psychometric properties. For thorough assessment the FMT needs to be combined with functional measures. These findings illustrate the need for strategies to build international consensus on appropriate outcome measures for upper limb function after stroke.

摘要

背景

确定中风研究中最常用的上肢结局指标,可能有助于提高科学家和临床医生之间的共识。

目的

在本研究中,我们旨在确定中风后干预研究中最常用的上肢结局指标,并描述根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)所涵盖的领域、指标的组合方式,以及它们在地理区域和时间上的使用差异。

方法

根据PRISMA指南,在PubMed、CINAHL和PEDro数据库中检索中风上肢干预研究,共纳入477项研究。

结果

在研究中发现了48种不同的结局指标。其中只有15种结局指标在超过5%的研究中被使用。Fugl-Meyer测试(FMT)是最常用的指标(在36%的研究中使用)。常用指标在不同程度上涵盖了ICF的身体功能和活动领域。大多数研究(72%)结合了多个结局指标:FMT常与运动活动日志(MAL)、Wolf运动功能测试和动作研究臂测试相结合,但很少与运动评估量表或九孔插板测试相结合。诸如选择性手指运动等手动灵巧性的关键组成部分很少被测量。FMT以及运动学评估的使用频率在十二年期间有所增加,而其他指标,如MAL和Jebsen Taylor手测试的使用随时间减少。各国之间的使用差异很大,缺乏国际共识。

结论

结果表明,各项研究中使用的结局指标具有很大的多样性。然而,越来越多的研究使用FMT,这是一种具有良好心理测量特性的神经学测试。为了进行全面评估,FMT需要与功能指标相结合。这些发现表明,需要制定策略,就中风后上肢功能的适当结局指标达成国际共识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/475e/4859525/d60e40607230/pone.0154792.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验