Applequist W L
William L. Brown Center, Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Acta Hortic. 2015 Jan 12;1061:25-33. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1061.1.
The genus is widespread and morphologically difficult, and as a result, no taxonomic treatment to date has been entirely satisfactory. The only modern revision, by Bolli, reduced the number of recognized species worldwide from over 30 to nine. In Bolli's treatment, five taxa formerly considered to be distinct species, including , , , and the endemic island taxa and , were placed within as subspecies. Available data relating to these taxa are briefly reviewed. It is suggested that, while the recognition of the American elder as subsp. is reasonable, and possibly would be better treated as distinct species; the best classification of the other two taxa remains uncertain. The preferred family assignment for is , though the name of this family may change in future depending upon the ultimate disposition of published nomenclatural proposals now in process.
该属分布广泛且形态学上难以区分,因此,迄今为止没有一种分类处理是完全令人满意的。唯一的现代修订版由博利完成,他将全球公认的物种数量从30多个减少到了9个。在博利的分类处理中,以前被认为是不同物种的五个分类单元,包括[具体物种1]、[具体物种2]、[具体物种3]以及地方性岛屿分类单元[具体物种4]和[具体物种5],被归为[属名]的亚种。本文简要回顾了与这些分类单元相关的现有数据。有人认为,虽然将美洲接骨木认定为[属名]亚种[亚种名]是合理的,但[具体物种1]以及可能的[具体物种2]最好被视为不同的物种;另外两个分类单元的最佳分类仍不确定。[属名]首选的科归属是[科名],不过这个科的名称未来可能会根据目前正在进行的已发表命名提案的最终处理结果而改变。