Phuoc Thanh Lam, Jamikorn Uttra
Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture and Applied Biology, Can Tho University, Can Tho city, Vietnam.
Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017 Feb;30(2):198-205. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0823. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of single or/and double strains of probiotic supplement on feed efficiency, growth performance, and microbial population in distal gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of weaning rabbits.
Sixty-four weaning (28 days old) New Zealand White rabbits were randomly distributed into four groups with treatments including: basal diet without probiotic supplement (control) or supplemented as follows: 1×10 cfu/g (BS group), 1×10 cfu/g (LA group), or 0.5×10 cfu/g plus 0.5×10 cfu/g (BL group). During the research, the male and female rabbits were fed separately. Body weight of the rabbits was recorded at 28, 42, and 70 d of age.
There was an increase (p<0.05) in body weight gain for the LA group at 42 d. Rabbits fed BL responsed with a greater growth (p<0.05) and better feed conversion ratio (p<0.05) than those fed with no probiotic. Digestibility coefficients of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, and gross energy were higher (p<0.05) in LA and BL groups than those in the control group. Male rabbits had higher (p<0.05) spp. and spp. in the ileum than female rabbits. Rabbits supplemented with BS had greater (p<0.05) numbers of bacilli in all intestinal segments than those receiving no probiotic, whereas intestinal Lactobacilli populations were greater (p<0.001) in the LA and BL diets compared to control. Average intestinal coliform populations were lowest (p<0.05) in the rabbits supplemented with LA as compared to those fed the control and BS.
Supplementation of alone or in combination with at a half of dose could enhance number of gut beneficial bacteria populations, nutrient digestibility, cecal fermentation, feed efficiency, and growth performance, but rabbits receiving only alone were not different from the controls without probiotic.
本研究旨在探讨单株或双株益生菌补充剂对断奶仔兔饲料效率、生长性能及远端胃肠道(GIT)微生物种群的影响。
64只断奶(28日龄)新西兰白兔随机分为四组,处理方式包括:不添加益生菌的基础日粮(对照组)或如下添加:1×10 cfu/g (BS组)、1×10 cfu/g (LA组)或0.5×10 cfu/g 加0.5×10 cfu/g (BL组)。研究期间,雌雄兔分开饲养。在28、42和70日龄时记录兔的体重。
LA组在42日龄时体重增加(p<0.05)。与未添加益生菌的兔相比,饲喂BL的兔生长更快(p<0.05)且饲料转化率更高(p<0.05)。LA组和BL组的干物质、有机物、粗蛋白、中性洗涤纤维和总能消化率系数高于对照组(p<0.05)。雄性兔回肠中的 spp.和 spp.高于雌性兔(p<0.05)。补充BS的兔所有肠段中的杆菌数量比未添加益生菌的兔更多(p<0.05),而与对照组相比,LA组和BL组日粮中的肠道乳酸杆菌数量更多(p<0.001)。与饲喂对照组和BS组的兔相比,补充LA的兔平均肠道大肠杆菌数量最低(p<0.05)。
单独添加 或与 以一半剂量联合添加可增加肠道有益菌数量、提高养分消化率、促进盲肠发酵、提高饲料效率和生长性能,但仅单独添加 的兔与未添加益生菌的对照组无差异。