Kimmel April D, Martin Erika G, Galadima Hadiza, Bono Rose S, Tehrani Ali Bonakdar, Cyrus John W, Henderson Margaret, Freedberg Kenneth A, Krist Alexander H
a Department of Health Behavior and Policy , Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine , Richmond , VA , USA.
b Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government , Albany , NY , USA.
AIDS Care. 2016 Oct;28(10):1215-22. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1178702. Epub 2016 May 13.
With over 1 million people living with HIV, the US faces national challenges in HIV care delivery due to an inadequate HIV specialist workforce and the increasing role of non-communicable chronic diseases in driving morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. Alternative HIV care delivery models, which include substantial roles for advanced practitioners and/or coordination between specialty and primary care settings in managing HIV-infected patients, may address these needs. We aimed to systematically review the evidence on patient-level HIV-specific and primary care health outcomes for HIV-infected adults receiving outpatient care across HIV care delivery models. We identified randomized trials and observational studies from bibliographic and other databases through March 2016. Eligible studies met pre-specified eligibility criteria including on care delivery models and patient-level health outcomes. We considered all available evidence, including non-experimental studies, and evaluated studies for risk of bias. We identified 3605 studies, of which 13 met eligibility criteria. Of the 13 eligible studies, the majority evaluated specialty-based care (9 studies). Across all studies and care delivery models, eligible studies primarily reported mortality and antiretroviral use, with specialty-based care associated with mortality reductions at the clinician and practice levels and with increased antiretroviral initiation or use at the clinician level but not the practice level. Limited and heterogeneous outcomes were reported for other patient-level HIV-specific outcomes (e.g., viral suppression) as well as for primary care health outcomes across all care delivery models. No studies addressed chronic care outcomes related to aging. Limited evidence was available across geographic settings and key populations. As re-design of care delivery in the US continues to evolve, better understanding of patient-level HIV-related and primary care health outcomes, especially across different staffing models and among different patient populations and geographic locations, is urgently needed to improve HIV disease management.
美国有超过100万人感染了艾滋病毒,由于艾滋病毒专科医护人员不足,以及非传染性慢性病在导致艾滋病毒感染者发病和死亡方面的作用日益增加,美国在艾滋病毒护理服务方面面临着全国性挑战。替代性艾滋病毒护理服务模式,包括高级从业者发挥重要作用和/或专科护理与初级护理机构在管理艾滋病毒感染者方面进行协调,可能满足这些需求。我们旨在系统回顾关于接受不同艾滋病毒护理服务模式的门诊艾滋病毒感染成人患者层面的艾滋病毒特异性和初级护理健康结局的证据。我们通过检索文献目录和其他数据库,确定了截至2016年3月的随机试验和观察性研究。符合条件的研究满足预先设定的资格标准,包括护理服务模式和患者层面的健康结局。我们考虑了所有可用证据,包括非实验性研究,并评估了研究的偏倚风险。我们共识别出3605项研究,其中13项符合资格标准。在这13项符合条件的研究中,大多数评估的是专科护理(9项研究)。在所有研究和护理服务模式中,符合条件的研究主要报告了死亡率和抗逆转录病毒药物的使用情况,专科护理在临床医生和医疗机构层面与死亡率降低相关,在临床医生层面与抗逆转录病毒药物启动或使用增加相关,但在医疗机构层面并非如此。对于其他患者层面的艾滋病毒特异性结局(如病毒抑制)以及所有护理服务模式中的初级护理健康结局,报告的结果有限且存在异质性。没有研究涉及与衰老相关的慢性护理结局。不同地理区域和关键人群的证据有限。随着美国护理服务重新设计的不断发展,迫切需要更好地了解患者层面与艾滋病毒相关的和初级护理健康结局,尤其是不同人员配置模式、不同患者群体以及不同地理位置之间的情况,以改善艾滋病毒疾病管理。