• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病早期诊断预测模型的比较

Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes.

作者信息

Jahani Meysam, Mahdavi Mahdi

机构信息

Department of Technology and Engineering, Qom University, Qom, Iran.

Department of Health Services Management and Organizations, Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Healthc Inform Res. 2016 Apr;22(2):95-100. doi: 10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.95. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

DOI:10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.95
PMID:27200219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4871851/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study develops neural network models to improve the prediction of diabetes using clinical and lifestyle characteristics. Prediction models were developed using a combination of approaches and concepts.

METHODS

We used memetic algorithms to update weights and to improve prediction accuracy of models. In the first step, the optimum amount for neural network parameters such as momentum rate, transfer function, and error function were obtained through trial and error and based on the results of previous studies. In the second step, optimum parameters were applied to memetic algorithms in order to improve the accuracy of prediction. This preliminary analysis showed that the accuracy of neural networks is 88%. In the third step, the accuracy of neural network models was improved using a memetic algorithm and resulted model was compared with a logistic regression model using a confusion matrix and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

RESULTS

The memetic algorithm improved the accuracy from 88.0% to 93.2%. We also found that memetic algorithm had a higher accuracy than the model from the genetic algorithm and a regression model. Among models, the regression model has the least accuracy. For the memetic algorithm model the amount of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and ROC are 96.2, 95.3, 93.8, 92.4, and 0.958 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study provide a basis to design a Decision Support System for risk management and planning of care for individuals at risk of diabetes.

摘要

目的

本研究开发神经网络模型,以利用临床和生活方式特征改进对糖尿病的预测。使用多种方法和概念开发预测模型。

方法

我们使用混合算法更新权重并提高模型的预测准确性。第一步,通过反复试验并基于先前研究的结果,获得神经网络参数(如动量率、传递函数和误差函数)的最佳值。第二步,将最佳参数应用于混合算法以提高预测准确性。这一初步分析表明神经网络的准确率为88%。第三步,使用混合算法提高神经网络模型的准确性,并使用混淆矩阵和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)将所得模型与逻辑回归模型进行比较。

结果

混合算法将准确率从88.0%提高到了93.2%。我们还发现混合算法比遗传算法模型和回归模型具有更高的准确率。在这些模型中,回归模型的准确率最低。对于混合算法模型,灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和ROC分别为96.2、95.3、93.8、92.4和0.958。

结论

本研究结果为设计一个针对糖尿病风险个体的风险管理和护理规划决策支持系统提供了依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1480/4871851/bfaeb794c4c8/hir-22-95-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1480/4871851/35d158bbd984/hir-22-95-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1480/4871851/725506dedd1a/hir-22-95-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1480/4871851/245d55ecec2a/hir-22-95-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1480/4871851/bfaeb794c4c8/hir-22-95-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1480/4871851/35d158bbd984/hir-22-95-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1480/4871851/725506dedd1a/hir-22-95-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1480/4871851/245d55ecec2a/hir-22-95-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1480/4871851/bfaeb794c4c8/hir-22-95-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes.糖尿病早期诊断预测模型的比较
Healthc Inform Res. 2016 Apr;22(2):95-100. doi: 10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.95. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
2
Predicting patient survival after liver transplantation using evolutionary multi-objective artificial neural networks.利用进化多目标人工神经网络预测肝移植患者的生存情况。
Artif Intell Med. 2013 May;58(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
3
Sensitivity versus accuracy in multiclass problems using memetic Pareto evolutionary neural networks.使用混合帕累托进化神经网络处理多类问题时的灵敏度与准确性
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2010 May;21(5):750-70. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2010.2041468. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
4
A clinical decision support system for prediction of pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus.一种用于预测系统性红斑狼疮孕妇妊娠结局的临床决策支持系统。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
5
Artificial neural network models for prediction of acute coronary syndromes using clinical data from the time of presentation.使用就诊时的临床数据预测急性冠脉综合征的人工神经网络模型。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;46(5):431-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.09.012.
6
Identifying Important Attributes for Prognostic Prediction in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. A Hybrid Method of Decision Tree and Neural Network.识别创伤性脑损伤患者预后预测的重要属性。一种决策树和神经网络的混合方法。
Methods Inf Med. 2016 Oct 17;55(5):440-449. doi: 10.3414/ME15-01-0080. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
7
Using Time Series Analysis to Predict Cardiac Arrest in a PICU.使用时间序列分析预测儿科重症监护病房中的心脏骤停
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;16(9):e332-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000560.
8
Machine learning applications for the prediction of surgical site infection in neurological operations.机器学习在神经外科手术部位感染预测中的应用。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Aug 1;47(2):E7. doi: 10.3171/2019.5.FOCUS19241.
9
Applying data mining for the analysis of breast cancer data.应用数据挖掘技术分析乳腺癌数据。
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1246:175-89. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1985-7_12.
10
Comparison between logistic regression and neural networks to predict death in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency room.逻辑回归与神经网络在预测急诊室疑似脓毒症患者死亡情况方面的比较。
Crit Care. 2005 Apr;9(2):R150-6. doi: 10.1186/cc3054. Epub 2005 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive model for early detection of type 2 diabetes using patients' clinical symptoms, demographic features, and knowledge of diabetes.利用患者临床症状、人口统计学特征及糖尿病知识对2型糖尿病进行早期检测的预测模型。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 25;7(1):e1834. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1834. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
A Novel Proposal for Deep Learning-Based Diabetes Prediction: Converting Clinical Data to Image Data.一种基于深度学习的糖尿病预测新方案:将临床数据转换为图像数据。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 20;13(4):796. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040796.
3
Prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus based on nutrition data.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetes numeracy and blood glucose control: association with type of diabetes and source of care.糖尿病数字能力与血糖控制:与糖尿病类型及医疗服务来源的关联
Clin Diabetes. 2014 Oct;32(4):152-7. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.32.4.152.
2
A hybrid neural networks-fuzzy logic-genetic algorithm for grade estimation.一种用于等级估计的混合神经网络-模糊逻辑-遗传算法。
Comput Geosci. 2012 May;42:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.004.
3
The lifetime cost of diabetes and its implications for diabetes prevention.糖尿病的终身成本及其对糖尿病预防的影响。
基于营养数据预测 2 型糖尿病。
J Nutr Sci. 2021 Jun 21;10:e46. doi: 10.1017/jns.2021.36. eCollection 2021.
4
Estimation of Diabetes in a High-Risk Adult Chinese Population Using J48 Decision Tree Model.使用J48决策树模型对中国高危成年人群中的糖尿病进行评估。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Nov 26;13:4621-4630. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S279329. eCollection 2020.
5
Identification of Potential Type II Diabetes in a Large-Scale Chinese Population Using a Systematic Machine Learning Framework.利用系统机器学习框架在中国大规模人群中识别潜在的 2 型糖尿病。
J Diabetes Res. 2020 Sep 24;2020:6873891. doi: 10.1155/2020/6873891. eCollection 2020.
6
Nationwide prediction of type 2 diabetes comorbidities.全国范围内 2 型糖尿病合并症预测。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 4;10(1):1776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58601-7.
7
Predicting diabetes clinical outcomes using longitudinal risk factor trajectories.利用纵向风险因素轨迹预测糖尿病临床结局。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-1009-3.
8
Accurate and rapid screening model for potential diabetes mellitus.潜在糖尿病的准确快速筛查模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0790-3.
9
Identification of Potential Type II Diabetes in a Chinese Population with a Sensitive Decision Tree Approach.基于敏感决策树方法的中国人群 2 型糖尿病潜在性识别。
J Diabetes Res. 2019 Jan 22;2019:4248218. doi: 10.1155/2019/4248218. eCollection 2019.
Diabetes Care. 2014 Sep;37(9):2557-64. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2484.
4
Maternal diabetes, programming of beta-cell disorders and intergenerational risk of type 2 diabetes.母体糖尿病、β细胞功能障碍的编程与 2 型糖尿病的代际风险。
Diabetes Metab. 2014 Nov;40(5):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
5
Effects of lipids and lipoproteins on diabetic foot in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.脂质和脂蛋白对2型糖尿病患者糖尿病足的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(4):559-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
6
Beyond genetics. Influence of dietary factors and gut microbiota on type 1 diabetes.超越遗传学:饮食因素和肠道微生物群对1型糖尿病的影响
FEBS Lett. 2014 Nov 17;588(22):4234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
7
Evaluating the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus using artificial neural network: an effective classification approach.使用人工神经网络评估 2 型糖尿病的风险:一种有效的分类方法。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;100(1):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.023. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
8
Development of a predictive model to identify inpatients at risk of re-admission within 30 days of discharge (PARR-30).开发一种预测模型,以识别出院后30天内有再次入院风险的住院患者(PARR-30)。
BMJ Open. 2012 Aug 10;2(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001667. Print 2012.
9
A review of diabetes treatment adherence and the association with clinical and economic outcomes.糖尿病治疗依从性及其与临床和经济结局的关系综述。
Clin Ther. 2011 Jan;33(1):74-109. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.019.
10
A clinical decision support system using multilayer perceptron neural network to assess well being in diabetes.一种使用多层感知器神经网络评估糖尿病患者健康状况的临床决策支持系统。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2009 Feb;57:127-33.