Hurtado David A, Okechukwu Cassandra A, Buxton Orfeu M, Hammer Leslie, Hanson Ginger C, Moen Phyllis, Klein Laura C, Berkman Lisa F
Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Dec;70(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206953. Epub 2016 May 25.
Observational studies have linked work-family issues with cigarette consumption. This study examined the 6-month effects on cigarette consumption of a work-family supportive organisational intervention among nursing home workers.
Group randomised controlled trial where 30 nursing homes across New England states were randomly assigned to either usual practice or to a 4-month intervention aimed at reducing work-family conflict via increased schedule control and family supportive supervisory behaviours (FSSB). Cigarette consumption was based on self-reported number of cigarettes per week, measured at the individual level.
A total of 1524 direct-care workers were enrolled in the trial. Cigarette consumption was prevalent in 30% of the sample, consuming an average of 77 cigarettes/week. Smokers at intervention sites reduced cigarette consumption by 7.12 cigarettes, while no reduction was observed among smokers at usual practice sites (b=-7.12, 95% CI -13.83 to -0.40, p<0.05) (d=-0.15). The majority of smokers were US-born White nursing assistants, and among this subgroup, the reduction in cigarette consumption was stronger (b=-12.77, 95% CI -22.31 to -3.22, p<0.05) (d=-0.27). Although the intervention prevented a decline in FSSB (d=0.08), effects on cigarette consumption were not mediated by FSSB.
Cigarette consumption was reduced among smokers at organisations where a work-family supportive intervention was implemented. This effect, however, was not explained by specific targets of the intervention, but other psychosocial pathways related to the work-family interface.
NCT02050204; results.
观察性研究已将工作-家庭问题与吸烟行为联系起来。本研究探讨了一项针对养老院工作人员的工作-家庭支持性组织干预措施对吸烟行为的6个月影响。
采用群组随机对照试验,将新英格兰各州的30家养老院随机分为常规护理组或接受为期4个月的干预组,该干预旨在通过加强日程控制和家庭支持性监督行为(FSSB)来减少工作-家庭冲突。吸烟量基于个体层面自我报告的每周吸烟数量。
共有1524名直接护理人员参与了该试验。30%的样本有吸烟行为,平均每周吸烟77支。干预组的吸烟者吸烟量减少了7.12支,而常规护理组的吸烟者未观察到吸烟量减少(b=-7.12,95%CI -13.83至-0.40,p<0.05)(d=-0.15)。大多数吸烟者是在美国出生的白人护理助理,在这个亚组中,吸烟量的减少更为明显(b=-12.77,95%CI -22.31至-3.22,p<0.05)(d=-0.27)。尽管干预措施防止了FSSB的下降(d=0.08),但对吸烟量的影响并非由FSSB介导。
在实施了工作-家庭支持性干预措施的机构中,吸烟者的吸烟量有所减少。然而,这种效果并非由干预措施的特定目标所解释,而是与工作-家庭界面相关的其他心理社会途径所致。
NCT02050204;结果