• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作-家庭支持性组织干预对香烟消费的影响:工作、家庭与健康网络研究的6个月结果

Effects on cigarette consumption of a work-family supportive organisational intervention: 6-month results from the work, family and health network study.

作者信息

Hurtado David A, Okechukwu Cassandra A, Buxton Orfeu M, Hammer Leslie, Hanson Ginger C, Moen Phyllis, Klein Laura C, Berkman Lisa F

机构信息

Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Dec;70(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206953. Epub 2016 May 25.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2015-206953
PMID:27225680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8919500/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have linked work-family issues with cigarette consumption. This study examined the 6-month effects on cigarette consumption of a work-family supportive organisational intervention among nursing home workers.

METHODS

Group randomised controlled trial where 30 nursing homes across New England states were randomly assigned to either usual practice or to a 4-month intervention aimed at reducing work-family conflict via increased schedule control and family supportive supervisory behaviours (FSSB). Cigarette consumption was based on self-reported number of cigarettes per week, measured at the individual level.

RESULTS

A total of 1524 direct-care workers were enrolled in the trial. Cigarette consumption was prevalent in 30% of the sample, consuming an average of 77 cigarettes/week. Smokers at intervention sites reduced cigarette consumption by 7.12 cigarettes, while no reduction was observed among smokers at usual practice sites (b=-7.12, 95% CI -13.83 to -0.40, p<0.05) (d=-0.15). The majority of smokers were US-born White nursing assistants, and among this subgroup, the reduction in cigarette consumption was stronger (b=-12.77, 95% CI -22.31 to -3.22, p<0.05) (d=-0.27). Although the intervention prevented a decline in FSSB (d=0.08), effects on cigarette consumption were not mediated by FSSB.

CONCLUSIONS

Cigarette consumption was reduced among smokers at organisations where a work-family supportive intervention was implemented. This effect, however, was not explained by specific targets of the intervention, but other psychosocial pathways related to the work-family interface.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02050204; results.

摘要

背景

观察性研究已将工作-家庭问题与吸烟行为联系起来。本研究探讨了一项针对养老院工作人员的工作-家庭支持性组织干预措施对吸烟行为的6个月影响。

方法

采用群组随机对照试验,将新英格兰各州的30家养老院随机分为常规护理组或接受为期4个月的干预组,该干预旨在通过加强日程控制和家庭支持性监督行为(FSSB)来减少工作-家庭冲突。吸烟量基于个体层面自我报告的每周吸烟数量。

结果

共有1524名直接护理人员参与了该试验。30%的样本有吸烟行为,平均每周吸烟77支。干预组的吸烟者吸烟量减少了7.12支,而常规护理组的吸烟者未观察到吸烟量减少(b=-7.12,95%CI -13.83至-0.40,p<0.05)(d=-0.15)。大多数吸烟者是在美国出生的白人护理助理,在这个亚组中,吸烟量的减少更为明显(b=-12.77,95%CI -22.31至-3.22,p<0.05)(d=-0.27)。尽管干预措施防止了FSSB的下降(d=0.08),但对吸烟量的影响并非由FSSB介导。

结论

在实施了工作-家庭支持性干预措施的机构中,吸烟者的吸烟量有所减少。然而,这种效果并非由干预措施的特定目标所解释,而是与工作-家庭界面相关的其他心理社会途径所致。

试验注册号

NCT02050204;结果

相似文献

1
Effects on cigarette consumption of a work-family supportive organisational intervention: 6-month results from the work, family and health network study.工作-家庭支持性组织干预对香烟消费的影响:工作、家庭与健康网络研究的6个月结果
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Dec;70(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206953. Epub 2016 May 25.
2
Delayed compensatory cigarette consumption after a workplace smoking ban.工作场所禁烟后延迟的补偿性香烟消费
Tob Control. 1997 Summer;6(2):131-5. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.2.131.
3
Cigarette pack size and consumption: an adaptive randomised controlled trial.香烟包装大小与消费:一项适应性随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 18;21(1):1420. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11413-4.
4
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation and reduction.用于戒烟和减少吸烟量的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(12):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub2. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
5
The influence of cigarette consumption and smoking machine yields of tar and nicotine on the nicotine uptake and oral mucosal lesions in smokers.香烟消费量以及吸烟机测得的焦油和尼古丁含量对吸烟者尼古丁摄取量和口腔黏膜损伤的影响。
J Oral Pathol Med. 1997 Mar;26(3):117-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1997.tb00033.x.
6
7
Self-reported price of cigarettes, consumption and compensatory behaviours in a cohort of Mexican smokers before and after a cigarette tax increase.在墨西哥吸烟者中,在香烟税增加前后,自我报告的香烟价格、消费和补偿行为的队列研究。
Tob Control. 2010 Dec;19(6):481-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.032177. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
8
Associated Changes in E-cigarette Puff Duration and Cigarettes Smoked per Day.电子烟吸嘴时间和每天吸烟支数的相关变化。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Mar 19;23(4):760-764. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa211.
9
Overtime work, cigarette consumption, and addiction to cigarette among workers subject to mild smoking restrictions.轻度吸烟限制下工人的加班工作、香烟消费及香烟成瘾情况。
Ind Health. 2006 Apr;44(2):244-9. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.44.244.
10
Cohort study of electronic cigarette use: effectiveness and safety at 24 months.电子烟使用的队列研究:24个月时的有效性和安全性
Tob Control. 2017 May;26(3):284-292. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052822. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions Intended to Improve the Well-Being at Work of Nurses Working in Care Settings for Older People-A Systematic Review.旨在改善在老年人护理机构工作的护士工作幸福感的干预措施——一项系统综述
Int J Older People Nurs. 2025 Jan;20(1):e70005. doi: 10.1111/opn.70005.
2
Employment Characteristics and Tobacco Product Use, U.S., 2021.就业特点与美国 2021 年的烟草制品使用情况
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Sep;67(3):423-433. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Double Trouble: The Burden of Child-rearing and Working on Maternal Mortality.

本文引用的文献

1
Intervention effects on safety compliance and citizenship behaviors: Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Study.干预对安全合规和公民行为的影响:来自工作、家庭与健康研究的证据。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Feb;101(2):190-208. doi: 10.1037/apl0000047. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
2
Work-family conflict, cardiometabolic risk, and sleep duration in nursing employees.护理人员的工作-家庭冲突、心脏代谢风险和睡眠时间
J Occup Health Psychol. 2015 Oct;20(4):420-33. doi: 10.1037/a0039143. Epub 2015 May 11.
3
Changing Work and Work-Family Conflict: Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network*.
双重负担:育儿和工作对产妇死亡率的影响。
Demography. 2020 Apr;57(2):559-576. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00868-6.
4
Work-Family Conflict and Ideal Cardiovascular Health Score in the ELSA-Brasil Baseline Assessment.工作-家庭冲突与 ELSA-Brasil 基线评估中的理想心血管健康评分。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct 15;8(20):e012701. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012701. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
工作变化与工作-家庭冲突:来自工作、家庭与健康网络的证据*
Am Sociol Rev. 2014 Jun 1;79(3):485-516. doi: 10.1177/0003122414531435.
4
Designing Work, Family & Health Organizational Change Initiatives.设计工作、家庭与健康组织变革计划。
Organ Dyn. 2014;43(1):53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.10.007.
5
Association between work-family conflict and smoking quantity among daily smokers.工作家庭冲突与每日吸烟者吸烟量的关系。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Nov;15(11):1867-72. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt071. Epub 2013 May 24.
6
Team-level flexibility, work-home spillover, and health behavior.团队层面的灵活性、工作与家庭的溢出效应与健康行为。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 May;84:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.011. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
7
Manager support for work-family issues and its impact on employee-reported pain in the extended care setting.管理层对工作-家庭问题的支持及其对长期护理环境中员工报告的疼痛的影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Sep;54(9):1142-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182554af4.
8
Assessing the relationship between work-family conflict and smoking.评估工作-家庭冲突与吸烟之间的关系。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Sep;102(9):1767-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300413. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
9
Implementation of workplace-based smoking cessation support activities and smoking cessation among employees: the Finnish Public Sector Study.工作场所戒烟支持活动的实施与员工戒烟:芬兰公共部门研究。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):e56-62. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300823. Epub 2012 May 17.
10
Racial disparities in job strain among American and immigrant long-term care workers.美国和移民长期护理工作者工作压力种族差异。
Int Nurs Rev. 2012 Jun;59(2):237-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00948.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7.