文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

二氧化碳激光联合皮下分离术治疗痤疮瘢痕患者的疗效

Effectiveness of CO laser with subcision in patients with acne scars.

作者信息

Anupama Y G, Wahab Afthab Jameela

机构信息

a Department of Dermatology , Venereology and Leprosy , Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore , India.

b Department of Dermatology , Venereology and Leprosy , Stanley Medical College, Chennai , India.

出版信息

J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016 Nov;18(7):367-371. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2016.1188213. Epub 2016 Jul 18.


DOI:10.1080/14764172.2016.1188213
PMID:27231159
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-acne facial scarring has always been a challenge to treat. It requires multiple therapeutic modalities as single modality is not hundred percent effective. Therefore, we have combined CO laser resurfacing with subcision in patients with acne scars for better results. OBJECTIVES: The aim is to study the effectiveness and side effects of CO laser with subcision in patients with atrophic acne scars. METHODS: Fifty patients were selected for the study. Baseline grading was done with Goodman and Baron grading system. Twenty-five patients were randomly selected for subcision followed by CO laser and the remaining patients were selected for CO laser alone. The treatment was done for four sessions at 4-week interval. Clinical photographs were obtained for evaluation. RESULTS: CO laser with subcision showed excellent response in grade-2 and -3 acne scars. Statistically there is a significant difference between CO laser following subcision and CO laser alone at 5% level (p < 0.05). Both procedures were well tolerated with minimal side effects. CONCLUSION: The highly versatile CO laser is useful for treating acne scars. Subcision prior to the CO laser procedure showed better improvement when compared to CO laser alone. Thus, in acne scars, multiple therapeutic modalities achieve better results.

摘要

背景:痤疮后面部瘢痕的治疗一直是一项挑战。由于单一治疗方式并非百分百有效,因此需要多种治疗方法。所以,我们将二氧化碳激光磨皮术与皮下分离术联合应用于痤疮瘢痕患者,以获得更好的效果。 目的:研究二氧化碳激光联合皮下分离术治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕患者的有效性及副作用。 方法:选取50例患者进行研究。采用古德曼和巴伦分级系统进行基线分级。随机选取25例患者先进行皮下分离术,随后进行二氧化碳激光治疗,其余患者仅接受二氧化碳激光治疗。治疗共进行4个疗程,间隔4周。拍摄临床照片用于评估。 结果:二氧化碳激光联合皮下分离术在2级和3级痤疮瘢痕中显示出极佳的效果。在5%的水平上,皮下分离术后二氧化碳激光治疗与单纯二氧化碳激光治疗之间存在显著统计学差异(p < 0.05)。两种治疗方法耐受性良好,副作用极小。 结论:高度通用的二氧化碳激光可用于治疗痤疮瘢痕。与单纯二氧化碳激光治疗相比,在二氧化碳激光治疗前进行皮下分离术显示出更好的改善效果。因此,对于痤疮瘢痕,多种治疗方式可取得更好的效果。

相似文献

[1]
Effectiveness of CO laser with subcision in patients with acne scars.

J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016-11

[2]
Subcision and 1320-nm Nd:YAG nonablative laser resurfacing for the treatment of acne scars: a simultaneous split-face single patient trial.

Dermatol Surg. 2004-10

[3]
Effectiveness of subcision using carboxytherapy plus fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: comparative split face study.

J Dermatolog Treat. 2020-5

[4]
Single Session Treatment of Rolling Acne Scars Using Tumescent Anesthesia, 20% Trichloracetic Acid Extensive Subcision, and Fractional CO2 Laser.

Dermatol Surg. 2017-1

[5]
A combined subcision approach with either fractional CO laser (10,600 nm) or cross-linked hyaluronic acid versus subcision alone in atrophic post-acne scar treatment.

Lasers Med Sci. 2022-12-24

[6]
A split-face comparative study to evaluate efficacy of combined subcision and dermaroller against combined subcision and cryoroller in treatment of acne scars.

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014-3

[7]
Simultaneous versus sequential fractional CO laser and subcision combination for management of post-acne atrophic scars: A split-face comparative study.

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024-10

[8]
The efficacy and safety of subcision using CO gas combined with fractional laser for acne scars: Clinical and microscopic evaluation.

J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016-11

[9]
Efficacy of fractionated microneedle radiofrequency with and without adding subcision for the treatment of atrophic facial acne scars: A randomized split-face clinical study.

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017-6

[10]
Treatment of atrophic acne scars using autologous platelet-rich plasma vs combined subcision and autologous platelet-rich plasma: A split-face comparative study.

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019-6-26

引用本文的文献

[1]
Treatment of acne scars using subcision combined with concentrated growth factors versus subcision monotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Arch Dermatol Res. 2025-2-24

[2]
Subcision with platelet-rich plasma and microneedling versus subcision with saline and micro-needling in posttraumatic scars.

Arch Dermatol Res. 2024-8-19

[3]
Fractional carbon dioxide laser combined with subcision for the treatment of three subtypes of atrophic acne scars: a retrospective analysis.

Lasers Med Sci. 2023-8-28

[4]
Subcision for Atrophic Acne Scarring: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Instruments and Combinatorial Treatments.

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023-1-18

[5]
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Ann Transl Med. 2022-12

[6]
Subcision and Microneedling as an Inexpensive and Safe Combination to Treat Atrophic Acne Scars in Dark Skin: A Prospective Study of 45 Patients at a Tertiary Care Center.

J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索