Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Feb 29;5(5):341-4. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.26.
In their hypothesis published in IJHPM, Lisa Forman and colleagues examined the prominence of the right to health and sexual and reproductive health rights (as well as related language) in four of the key reports that fed into the process of negotiating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Now that the SDGs have been formally adopted, this comment builds on some of the insights of Forman and colleagues to examine the extent to which those rights have been incorporated in SDGs 3 and 5. I argue that sexual and reproductive health rights are relatively well-covered within the SDGs. In terms of the right to health, however, the picture is much less clear. Some of the elements that make up that right are present and correct, but the SDGs have delivered no coherent vision of how a 'right to health' might actually be realized. An important task facing global health and human rights advocates is to continue pushing human rights framings so that progress is made both on meeting the SDGs and on realizing the right to health.
在他们发表于 IJPHM 的假设中，Lisa Forman 和同事们研究了健康权和性健康与生殖健康权利（以及相关用语）在四个关键报告中的突出地位，这些报告为可持续发展目标（SDGs）的谈判过程提供了依据。SDGs 现已正式通过，本评论以 Forman 和同事们的一些观点为基础，考察了这些权利在 SDGs 3 和 5 中的纳入程度。我认为，性健康与生殖健康权利在 SDGs 中得到了相对较好的涵盖。然而，就健康权而言，情况就不那么清楚了。构成该权利的一些要素存在且正确，但 SDGs 并未提出如何实现“健康权”的连贯愿景。全球卫生和人权倡导者面临的一个重要任务是继续推动人权框架，以便在实现 SDGs 和实现健康权方面都取得进展。
