• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和成人在简单符号和非符号数字决策中的信息处理组件的个体差异。

Individual differences in the components of children's and adults' information processing for simple symbolic and non-symbolic numeric decisions.

作者信息

Thompson Clarissa A, Ratcliff Roger, McKoon Gail

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA.

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Oct;150:48-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.04.005
PMID:27239983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5688952/
Abstract

How do speed and accuracy trade off, and what components of information processing develop as children and adults make simple numeric comparisons? Data from symbolic and non-symbolic number tasks were collected from 19 first graders (Mage=7.12 years), 26 second/third graders (Mage=8.20 years), 27 fourth/fifth graders (Mage=10.46 years), and 19 seventh/eighth graders (Mage=13.22 years). The non-symbolic task asked children to decide whether an array of asterisks had a larger or smaller number than 50, and the symbolic task asked whether a two-digit number was greater than or less than 50. We used a diffusion model analysis to estimate components of processing in tasks from accuracy, correct and error response times, and response time (RT) distributions. Participants who were accurate on one task were accurate on the other task, and participants who made fast decisions on one task made fast decisions on the other task. Older participants extracted a higher quality of information from the stimulus arrays, were more willing to make a decision, and were faster at encoding, transforming the stimulus representation, and executing their responses. Individual participants' accuracy and RTs were uncorrelated. Drift rate and boundary settings were significantly related across tasks, but they were unrelated to each other. Accuracy was mainly determined by drift rate, and RT was mainly determined by boundary separation. We concluded that RT and accuracy operate largely independently.

摘要

速度和准确性是如何相互权衡的?在儿童和成人进行简单数字比较时,信息处理的哪些组成部分会得到发展?我们从19名一年级学生(平均年龄=7.12岁)、26名二/三年级学生(平均年龄=8.20岁)、27名四/五年级学生(平均年龄=10.46岁)和19名七/八年级学生(平均年龄=13.22岁)中收集了来自符号和非符号数字任务的数据。非符号任务要求儿童判断一组星号的数量是大于还是小于50,符号任务要求判断一个两位数是大于还是小于50。我们使用扩散模型分析,根据准确性、正确和错误反应时间以及反应时间(RT)分布来估计任务处理的组成部分。在一项任务中准确的参与者在另一项任务中也准确,在一项任务中快速做出决策的参与者在另一项任务中也快速做出决策。年龄较大的参与者从刺激阵列中提取的信息质量更高,更愿意做出决策,并且在编码、转换刺激表征和执行反应方面更快。个体参与者的准确性和反应时间不相关。漂移率和边界设置在不同任务之间显著相关,但它们彼此不相关。准确性主要由漂移率决定,反应时间主要由边界分离决定。我们得出结论,反应时间和准确性在很大程度上是独立运作的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/2cddfa3781fa/nihms918639f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/b5e618c3a103/nihms918639f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/66205f7137d6/nihms918639f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/8b2f40809e38/nihms918639f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/7967fa5b3a01/nihms918639f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/cb632d669809/nihms918639f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/0ab2f59871c9/nihms918639f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/2cddfa3781fa/nihms918639f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/b5e618c3a103/nihms918639f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/66205f7137d6/nihms918639f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/8b2f40809e38/nihms918639f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/7967fa5b3a01/nihms918639f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/cb632d669809/nihms918639f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/0ab2f59871c9/nihms918639f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/5688952/2cddfa3781fa/nihms918639f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual differences in the components of children's and adults' information processing for simple symbolic and non-symbolic numeric decisions.儿童和成人在简单符号和非符号数字决策中的信息处理组件的个体差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Oct;150:48-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 28.
2
Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.模拟计算能力方面反应时间和准确性的个体差异。
Cognition. 2015 Apr;137:115-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
3
Individual differences influence two-digit number processing, but not their analog magnitude processing: a large-scale online study.个体差异影响两位数数字加工,但不影响其模拟数量加工:一项大规模在线研究。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1444-1464. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0964-5. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
4
Disentangling the Mechanisms of Symbolic Number Processing in Adults' Mathematics and Arithmetic Achievement.解开成人数学和算术成就中符号数字处理的机制。
Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;43(1). doi: 10.1111/cogs.12711.
5
Developmental trajectories of children's symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills and associated cognitive competencies.儿童符号数字大小处理技能及相关认知能力的发展轨迹。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Feb;166:232-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Children's mapping between non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitudes and its association with timed and untimed tests of mathematics achievement.儿童非符号与符号数字大小之间的映射及其与数学成绩定时和不定时测试的关联。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 3;9(4):e93565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093565. eCollection 2014.
7
Differential processing of symbolic numerical magnitude and order in first-grade children.一年级儿童对符号数字大小和顺序的差异处理。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;129:26-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
8
Differences in arithmetic performance between Chinese and German adults are accompanied by differences in processing of non-symbolic numerical magnitude.中国成年人与德国成年人在算术能力上的差异伴随着非符号数字大小处理方面的差异。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 6;12(4):e0174991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174991. eCollection 2017.
9
The Contribution of Numerical Magnitude Comparison and Phonological Processing to Individual Differences in Fourth Graders' Multiplication Fact Ability.数字大小比较和语音加工对四年级学生乘法运算能力个体差异的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0158335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158335. eCollection 2016.
10
Symbolic versus non-symbolic magnitude estimations among children and adults.儿童与成人的符号与非符号数量估计
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Dec;128:52-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of precision of non-symbolic arithmetic operations in 4-6-year-old children.4至6岁儿童非符号算术运算精度的发展
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 15;14:1286195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1286195. eCollection 2023.
2
Delta plots for conflict tasks: An activation-suppression race model.冲突任务的 Delta 图:激活-抑制竞争模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Dec;28(6):1776-1795. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01900-5. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
3
Low and variable correlation between reaction time costs and accuracy costs explained by accumulation models: Meta-analysis and simulations.

本文引用的文献

1
Adults with poor reading skills: How lexical knowledge interacts with scores on standardized reading comprehension tests.阅读能力较差的成年人:词汇知识与标准化阅读理解测试分数之间的相互作用。
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:453-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
2
Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making.决策的二择扩散模型中的个体差异与拟合方法
Decision (Wash D C ). 2015;2015. doi: 10.1037/dec0000030.
3
Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.
积累模型解释反应时成本和准确率成本之间的低且可变相关性:荟萃分析和模拟。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Nov;144(11):1200-1227. doi: 10.1037/bul0000164. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Modeling numerosity representation with an integrated diffusion model.用集成扩散模型对数量表示进行建模。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):183-217. doi: 10.1037/rev0000085. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
5
Computational neuroscience across the lifespan: Promises and pitfalls.毕生的计算神经科学:前景与陷阱。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Oct;33:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
模拟计算能力方面反应时间和准确性的个体差异。
Cognition. 2015 Apr;137:115-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
4
Numerical discrimination is mediated by neural coding variation.数字辨别由神经编码变异介导。
Cognition. 2014 Dec;133(3):601-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
5
Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement.不同类型的数字量级表征之间的关系以及它们与数学成绩的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Jul;123:53-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
6
Association between individual differences in non-symbolic number acuity and math performance: a meta-analysis.非符号数字敏锐度的个体差异与数学成绩之间的关联:一项元分析。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:163-72. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
Measuring psychometric functions with the diffusion model.用扩散模型测量心理物理函数。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr;40(2):870-88. doi: 10.1037/a0034954. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
8
Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model.扩散模型中的参数可变性和分布假设。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):281-92. doi: 10.1037/a0030775. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
9
Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample.毕生数字感:基于大规模互联网样本的揭示
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 10;109(28):11116-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200196109. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
10
Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults.非符号数字大小比较:不同任务变体和结果测量的信度与效度,及其与成年人算术成绩的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 May;140(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Mar 22.