Heinrich Antje, Henshaw Helen, Ferguson Melanie A
Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, Nottingham UK.
Otology and Hearing Group, National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham UK.
Front Psychol. 2016 May 23;7:576. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00576. eCollection 2016.
Good speech perception and communication skills in everyday life are crucial for participation and well-being, and are therefore an overarching aim of auditory rehabilitation. Both behavioral and self-report measures can be used to assess these skills. However, correlations between behavioral and self-report speech perception measures are often low. One possible explanation is that there is a mismatch between the specific situations used in the assessment of these skills in each method, and a more careful matching across situations might improve consistency of results. The role that cognition plays in specific speech situations may also be important for understanding communication, as speech perception tests vary in their cognitive demands. In this study, the role of executive function, working memory (WM) and attention in behavioral and self-report measures of speech perception was investigated. Thirty existing hearing aid users with mild-to-moderate hearing loss aged between 50 and 74 years completed a behavioral test battery with speech perception tests ranging from phoneme discrimination in modulated noise (easy) to words in multi-talker babble (medium) and keyword perception in a carrier sentence against a distractor voice (difficult). In addition, a self-report measure of aided communication, residual disability from the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile, was obtained. Correlations between speech perception tests and self-report measures were higher when specific speech situations across both were matched. Cognition correlated with behavioral speech perception test results but not with self-report. Only the most difficult speech perception test, keyword perception in a carrier sentence with a competing distractor voice, engaged executive functions in addition to WM. In conclusion, any relationship between behavioral and self-report speech perception is not mediated by a shared correlation with cognition.
在日常生活中,良好的言语感知和沟通技巧对于参与和幸福感至关重要,因此是听觉康复的首要目标。行为测量和自我报告测量均可用于评估这些技能。然而,行为测量和自我报告言语感知测量之间的相关性往往较低。一种可能的解释是,在每种方法中评估这些技能所使用的特定情境之间存在不匹配,更仔细地匹配情境可能会提高结果的一致性。认知在特定言语情境中所起的作用对于理解沟通也可能很重要,因为言语感知测试在认知需求方面各不相同。在本研究中,调查了执行功能、工作记忆(WM)和注意力在言语感知的行为测量和自我报告测量中的作用。30名年龄在50至74岁之间、患有轻度至中度听力损失的现有助听器使用者完成了一组行为测试,其中言语感知测试范围从调制噪声中的音素辨别(容易)到多说话者嘈杂声中的单词(中等)以及在有干扰语音的载体句子中的关键词感知(困难)。此外,还获得了来自格拉斯哥助听器效益概况的辅助沟通自我报告测量,即残余残疾。当两者的特定言语情境相匹配时,言语感知测试与自我报告测量之间的相关性更高。认知与行为言语感知测试结果相关,但与自我报告无关。只有最困难的言语感知测试,即在有竞争干扰语音的载体句子中的关键词感知,除了WM外还涉及执行功能。总之,行为和自我报告言语感知之间的任何关系都不是由与认知的共同相关性介导的。