Curtis Katrina J, Meyrick Victoria M, Mehta Bhavin, Haji Gulam S, Li Kawah, Montgomery Hugh, Man William D-C, Polkey Michael I, Hopkinson Nicholas S
1 National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec 1;194(11):1349-1357. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201601-0094OC.
Epidemiological studies in older individuals have found an association between the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition (ACE-I) therapy and preserved locomotor muscle mass, strength, and walking speed. ACE-I therapy might therefore have a role in the context of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR).
To investigate the hypothesis that enalapril, an ACE inhibitor, would augment the improvement in exercise capacity seen during PR.
We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, who had at least moderate airflow obstruction and were taking part in PR, were randomized to either 10 weeks of therapy with an ACE inhibitor (10 mg enalapril) or placebo.
The primary outcome measurement was the change in peak power (assessed using cycle ergometry) from baseline. Eighty patients were enrolled, 78 were randomized (age 67 ± 8 years; FEV 48 ± 21% predicted), and 65 completed the trial (34 on placebo, 31 on the ACE inhibitor). The ACE inhibitor-treated group demonstrated a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (Δ, -16 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -22 to -11) and serum ACE activity (Δ, -18 IU/L; 95% CI, -23 to -12) versus placebo (between-group differences, P < 0.0001). Peak power increased significantly more in the placebo group (placebo Δ, +9 W; 95% CI, 5 to 13 vs. ACE-I Δ, +1 W; 95% CI, -2 to 4; between-group difference, 8 W; 95% CI, 3 to 13; P = 0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in quadriceps strength or health-related quality of life.
Use of the ACE inhibitor enalapril, together with a program of PR, in patients without an established indication for ACE-I, reduced the peak work rate response to exercise training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
针对老年人的流行病学研究发现,使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂(ACE-I)疗法与维持运动肌肉质量、力量及步行速度之间存在关联。因此,ACE-I疗法在肺康复(PR)中可能发挥作用。
探讨ACE抑制剂依那普利能否增强PR期间运动能力改善效果的假设。
我们开展了一项双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组随机对照试验。将患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病、至少存在中度气流阻塞且正在接受PR的患者随机分为两组,分别接受10周的ACE抑制剂(10毫克依那普利)治疗或安慰剂治疗。
主要结局指标为自基线起峰值功率的变化(采用自行车测力计评估)。共纳入80例患者,78例被随机分组(年龄67±8岁;第1秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比为48±21%),65例完成试验(34例接受安慰剂治疗,31例接受ACE抑制剂治疗)。与安慰剂组相比,ACE抑制剂治疗组的收缩压显著降低(差值为-16毫米汞柱;95%置信区间[CI]为-22至-1),血清ACE活性也显著降低(差值为-18国际单位/升;95%CI为-23至-12)(组间差异,P<0.0001)。安慰剂组的峰值功率增加显著更多(安慰剂组差值为+9瓦;95%CI为5至13,而ACE-I组差值为+1瓦;95%CI为-2至4;组间差异为8瓦;95%CI为3至13;P=0.001)。两组间股四头肌力量或健康相关生活质量无显著差异。
在无既定ACE-I适应证的患者中,将ACE抑制剂依那普利与PR方案联合使用,会降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对运动训练的峰值工作率反应。