• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更聪明的大脑在发育过程中是否能在更长时间内保持更高的可塑性?一项计算研究。

Do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? A computational investigation.

作者信息

Thomas Michael S C

机构信息

Developmental Neurocognition Lab, Centre for Brain & Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jun;19:258-69. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.04.002
PMID:27261925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6988599/
Abstract

Twin studies indicate that the heritability of general cognitive ability - the genetic contribution to individual differences - increases with age. Brant et al. (2013) reported that this increase in heritability occurs earlier in development for low ability children than high ability children. Allied with structural brain imaging results that indicate faster thickening and thinning of cortex for high ability children (Shaw et al., 2006), Brant and colleagues argued higher cognitive ability represents an extended sensitive period for brain development. However, they admitted no coherent mechanistic account can currently reconcile the key empirical data. Here, computational methods are employed to demonstrate the empirical data can be reconciled without recourse to variations in sensitive periods. These methods utilized population-based artificial neural network models of cognitive development. In the model, ability-related variations stemmed from the timing of the increases in the non-linearity of computational processes, causing dizygotic twins to diverge in their behavior. These occurred in a population where: (a) ability was determined by the combined small contributions of many neurocomputational factors, and (b) individual differences in ability were largely genetically constrained. The model's explanation of developmental increases in heritability contrasts with proposals that these increases represent emerging gene-environment correlations (Haworth et al., 2010). The article advocates simulating inherited individual differences within an explicitly developmental framework.

摘要

双胞胎研究表明,一般认知能力的遗传度——即基因对个体差异的贡献——会随着年龄增长而增加。布兰特等人(2013年)报告称,与高能力儿童相比,低能力儿童在发育过程中遗传度的增加出现得更早。结合结构脑成像结果显示高能力儿童的皮质增厚和变薄速度更快(肖等人,2006年),布兰特及其同事认为,较高的认知能力代表了大脑发育的一个延长的敏感期。然而,他们承认目前没有连贯的机制解释能够调和关键的实证数据。在此,采用计算方法来证明无需借助敏感期的变化就能调和实证数据。这些方法利用了基于群体的认知发展人工神经网络模型。在该模型中,与能力相关的差异源于计算过程非线性增加的时间,导致异卵双胞胎在行为上出现差异。这些情况发生在这样一个群体中:(a)能力由许多神经计算因素的综合微小贡献决定,(b)能力的个体差异在很大程度上受到基因限制。该模型对遗传度发育性增加的解释与认为这些增加代表新出现的基因 - 环境相关性的提议形成对比(霍沃思等人,2010年)。本文主张在明确的发育框架内模拟遗传的个体差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/b7c11ad77258/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/1f72d7d3fa6f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/ad55a5f00539/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/a0457a2c72e7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/4d0224e7236b/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/b7c11ad77258/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/1f72d7d3fa6f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/ad55a5f00539/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/a0457a2c72e7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/4d0224e7236b/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94f9/6988599/b7c11ad77258/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? A computational investigation.更聪明的大脑在发育过程中是否能在更长时间内保持更高的可塑性?一项计算研究。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jun;19:258-69. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
2
Differences in heritability across groups differing in ability, revisited.对能力不同的群体间遗传力差异的再探讨。
Behav Genet. 1993 Jul;23(4):331-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01067433.
3
Brain plasticity and intellectual ability are influenced by shared genes.大脑的可塑性和智力受共享基因的影响。
J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 21;30(16):5519-24. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5841-09.2010.
4
Topology of genetic associations between regional gray matter volume and intellectual ability: Evidence for a high capacity network.区域灰质体积与智力之间遗传关联的拓扑结构:高容量网络的证据。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):1044-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.046. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Early cortical surface plasticity relates to basic mathematical learning.早期皮质表面可塑性与基础数学学习有关。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jan 1;204:116235. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116235. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
6
No differential heritability of intelligence test scores across ability levels in Norway.挪威不同能力水平的智力测试分数不存在差异遗传力。
Behav Genet. 1994 Jul;24(4):337-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01067534.
7
Genetic contributions to human brain morphology and intelligence.基因对人类大脑形态和智力的影响。
J Neurosci. 2006 Oct 4;26(40):10235-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1312-06.2006.
8
Experience during adolescence shapes brain development: From synapses and networks to normal and pathological behavior.青春期的经历塑造了大脑的发育:从突触和网络到正常和病理行为。
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2019 Nov-Dec;76:106834. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2019.106834. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
9
Human brain plasticity: evidence from sensory deprivation and altered language experience.人类大脑可塑性:来自感觉剥夺和语言体验改变的证据。
Prog Brain Res. 2002;138:177-88. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)38078-6.
10
Differential heritability across levels of cognitive ability.不同认知能力水平下的差异遗传力。
Behav Genet. 1992 Mar;22(2):153-62. doi: 10.1007/BF01066994.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of structural morphometry in children and adults with persistent developmental stuttering.持续性发育性口吃儿童与成人的结构形态测量比较。
Brain Commun. 2023 Nov 6;5(6):fcad301. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad301. eCollection 2023.
2
Environmental influences on the pace of brain development.环境对大脑发育速度的影响。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Jun;22(6):372-384. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00457-5. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Computational modeling of interventions for developmental disorders.发育障碍干预措施的计算建模。

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond a bigger brain: Multivariable structural brain imaging and intelligence.超越更大的大脑:多变量结构性脑成像与智力
Intelligence. 2015 Jul-Aug;51:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.05.001.
2
Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies.基于五十年双胞胎研究的人类特征遗传力的荟萃分析。
Nat Genet. 2015 Jul;47(7):702-9. doi: 10.1038/ng.3285. Epub 2015 May 18.
3
Multiscale Modeling of Gene-Behavior Associations in an Artificial Neural Network Model of Cognitive Development.认知发展人工神经网络模型中基因-行为关联的多尺度建模
Psychol Rev. 2019 Oct;126(5):693-726. doi: 10.1037/rev0000151. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
4
Intelligence as a Developing Function: A Neuroconstructivist Approach.作为一种发展功能的智力:一种神经建构主义方法。
J Intell. 2017 Apr 29;5(2):18. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5020018.
5
A neurocomputational model of developmental trajectories of gifted children under a polygenic model: When are gifted children held back by poor environments?多基因模型下天才儿童发育轨迹的神经计算模型:天才儿童何时会因恶劣环境而受阻?
Intelligence. 2018 Jul-Aug;69:200-212. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.008.
Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;40(1):51-99. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12230. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
4
Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年的家庭收入、父母教育程度与脑结构
Nat Neurosci. 2015 May;18(5):773-8. doi: 10.1038/nn.3983. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
5
Changes in thickness and surface area of the human cortex and their relationship with intelligence.人类大脑皮层厚度和表面积的变化及其与智力的关系。
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Jun;25(6):1608-17. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht357. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Modeling mechanisms of persisting and resolving delay in language development.建模语言发育迟缓持续和解决的机制。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Apr 1;57(2):467-83. doi: 10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-12-0254.
7
Associations between children's socioeconomic status and prefrontal cortical thickness.儿童社会经济地位与前额叶皮质厚度的关系。
Dev Sci. 2013 Sep;16(5):641-52. doi: 10.1111/desc.12096. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
8
Explaining the increasing heritability of cognitive ability across development: a meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies.解释认知能力在发展过程中遗传性增加的原因:纵向双胞胎和领养研究的荟萃分析。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1704-13. doi: 10.1177/0956797613478618. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
9
The nature and nurture of high IQ: an extended sensitive period for intellectual development.高智商的天性与教养:智力发展的延长敏感期。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Aug;24(8):1487-95. doi: 10.1177/0956797612473119. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
10
Modeling socioeconomic status effects on language development.建模社会经济地位对语言发展的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Dec;49(12):2325-43. doi: 10.1037/a0032301. Epub 2013 Apr 1.