Trainor L J, Trehub S E
Percept Psychophys. 1989 May;45(5):417-26. doi: 10.3758/bf03210715.
In a series of experiments, we examined age-related differences in adults' ability to order sequences of tones presented at various speeds and in contexts designed to promote or to impede stream segregation. In Experiment 1, 32 listeners (16 young, 16 old) were required to identify two repeating sequences that consisted of four tones (two from a high and two from a low frequency range) in different order. In Experiment 2, 32 listeners were required to judge whether the two recycled patterns from Experiment 1 were the same or different. In Experiment 3, four young and four old listeners were tested on the tasks of Experiment 2 over an extended period. In Experiment 4, 16 young and 16 old listeners were tested with sequences that were not recycled and were composed of tones drawn from a narrow frequency range. Elderly adults were less able than young adults to distinguish between tone sequences with contrasting order, regardless of the speed of presentation, the nature of the task (identification vs. same/different), the amount of practice, the frequency separation of the tones, or the presence or absence of recycling. These findings provide evidence of a temporal sequencing impairment in elderly listeners but reveal no indication of age differences in streaming processes.
在一系列实验中,我们研究了成年人在不同速度以及旨在促进或阻碍流分离的情境下对呈现的音调序列进行排序的能力的年龄差异。在实验1中,32名听众(16名年轻人,16名老年人)被要求识别由四个音调(两个来自高频范围,两个来自低频范围)以不同顺序组成的两个重复序列。在实验2中,32名听众被要求判断实验1中的两个循环模式是否相同。在实验3中,四名年轻听众和四名老年听众在较长时间内接受了实验2的任务测试。在实验4中,16名年轻听众和16名老年听众接受了由从狭窄频率范围抽取的音调组成的非循环序列的测试。无论呈现速度、任务性质(识别与相同/不同)、练习量、音调的频率分离,还是是否循环,老年人区分顺序相反的音调序列的能力都不如年轻人。这些发现为老年听众存在时间序列障碍提供了证据,但未显示出在流处理方面的年龄差异。