• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统和自锁托槽中的微生物复合体水平。

Microbial complexes levels in conventional and self-ligating brackets.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Clinic, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café, S/N, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, CEP: 14040-904, Brazil.

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1037-1046. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1865-5. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-016-1865-5
PMID:27270902
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aims were to evaluate the levels of bacterial species in saliva and in situ and to assess whether the design of brackets influences the risk of developing periodontal disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients (13.3 mean age) were bonded with self-ligating brackets and a conventional bracket. Saliva was collected before bonding and 30 and 60 days after bonding. One sample of each bracket was removed 30 and 60 days after bonding. The analysis was determined by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. The data was evaluated by the non-parametric test.

RESULTS

A significant increase in the levels of bacterial species in the saliva occurred in 15 of the 22 analyzed species. The self-ligating brackets presented the highest incidence percentages for the orange and red complexes 60 days after bonding. In situ analyses showed different patterns according to the bracket design. The levels of Campylobacter rectus showed significant differences (p = 0.011) 60 days after bonding among the three brackets; the highest values were observed in the In-Ovation®R bracket.

CONCLUSIONS

The bracket design seems to influence the levels of bacterial species involved in periodontal disease. Considering the wide variety of bacterial species, additional studies are needed to aid in the establishment of effective protocols to prevent the development of periodontal disease during orthodontic treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A dynamic alteration in the oral microbiota may lead to inflammatory reactions in the supporting soft and hard tissues. The different types of brackets interfere with bacterial adherence. Bracket design should be considered in orthodontic treatment.

摘要

目的

评估唾液中和原位细菌种类的水平,并评估托槽的设计是否会影响牙周病的发病风险。

材料和方法

将 20 名患者(平均年龄 13.3 岁)用自锁托槽和传统托槽粘接。在粘接前和粘接后 30 天和 60 天收集唾液。在粘接后 30 天和 60 天分别取出每个托槽的一个样本。通过斑点杂交 DNA-DNA 杂交分析。用非参数检验评估数据。

结果

在 22 种分析的细菌种中,有 15 种的细菌水平显著增加。自锁托槽在粘接后 60 天呈现出橙色和红色复合体的最高发生率。原位分析显示,根据托槽的设计呈现出不同的模式。在三种托槽中,直肠弯曲杆菌的水平在粘接后 60 天有显著差异(p=0.011);在 In-Ovation®R 托槽中观察到的数值最高。

结论

托槽的设计似乎影响牙周病相关细菌种类的水平。考虑到细菌种类的多样性,需要进一步研究以帮助建立有效的预防正畸治疗期间牙周病发生的方案。

临床意义

口腔微生物群的动态变化可能导致支持软硬组织的炎症反应。不同类型的托槽干扰细菌的黏附。在正畸治疗中应考虑托槽的设计。

相似文献

1
Microbial complexes levels in conventional and self-ligating brackets.传统和自锁托槽中的微生物复合体水平。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1037-1046. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1865-5. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
2
Microbial species associated with dental caries found in saliva and in situ after use of self-ligating and conventional brackets.唾液中和使用自锁托槽和传统托槽后原位中与龋齿相关的微生物种类。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:e20180426. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0426. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets.传统结扎托槽和自锁托槽患者唾液变形链球菌水平。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):94-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp033. Epub 2009 May 27.
4
Colonization of Streptococcus mutans on esthetic brackets: self-ligating vs conventional.变形链球菌在美学托槽上的定植:自锁托槽与传统托槽。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4 Suppl):S72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.017.
5
Gingival crevicular fluid volume and periodontal parameters alterations after use of conventional and self-ligating brackets.使用传统托槽和自锁托槽后龈沟液量及牙周参数的变化
J Orthod. 2016 Dec;43(4):260-267. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2016.1221214. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
6
Effect of the bracket types on microbial colonization and periodontal status.托槽类型对微生物定植和牙周状况的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):1062-7. doi: 10.2319/111813-844.1. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
7
Cytokine profile changes in gingival crevicular fluid after placement different brackets types.不同托槽类型放置后龈沟液细胞因子谱的变化。
Arch Oral Biol. 2018 Jan;85:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.09.022. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
Accuracy of positioning three types of self-ligating brackets compared with a conventionally ligating bracket.三种自锁托槽与传统结扎托槽的定位准确性比较。
J Orthod. 2012 Mar;39(1):34-42. doi: 10.1179/14653121226806.
9
Self-ligating brackets exhibit accumulation of high levels of periodontopathogens in gingival crevicular fluid.自锁托槽在龈沟液中会积累高水平的牙周致病菌。
Odontology. 2022 Jul;110(3):460-466. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00677-2. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
10
A comparison of white spot lesion formation between a self-ligating bracket and a conventional preadjusted straight wire bracket.自结扎托槽与传统预成直丝弓托槽之间白斑病变形成的比较。
World J Orthod. 2008 Summer;9(2):e46-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of conventional and self-ligating brackets on periodontal health. Systematic review and meta-analysis.传统托槽与自锁托槽对牙周健康的影响。系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Mar 1;16(3):e358-e366. doi: 10.4317/jced.61378. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Microbial contamination profile on esthetic elastomeric ligatures through the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique : A randomized split-mouth study.通过棋盘式 DNA-DNA 杂交技术评估弹性橡皮圈的微生物污染状况:一项随机分侧研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Aug;85(Suppl 2):155-164. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00507-w. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
3
Immune System Acts on Orthodontic Tooth Movement: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of periodontal treatment on the improvement of inflammatory markers in children.牙周治疗对改善儿童炎症标志物的有效性。
Arch Oral Biol. 2014 Jun;59(6):639-44. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
2
The effects of different orthodontic appliances upon microbial communities.不同正畸矫治器对微生物群落的影响。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014 May;17(2):115-23. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12037. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
3
Bacterial community development in experimental gingivitis.实验性牙龈炎中的细菌群落发展。
免疫系统在正畸牙齿移动中的作用:细胞和分子机制。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Oct 25;2022:9668610. doi: 10.1155/2022/9668610. eCollection 2022.
4
Bacterial Microleakage at the Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study.种植体-基台界面处的细菌微渗漏:一项体外研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jun 26;9(7):277. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9070277.
5
Microbial colonisation associated with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a systematic review.与传统和自锁托槽相关的微生物定植:系统评价。
J Orthod. 2022 Jun;49(2):151-162. doi: 10.1177/14653125211056023. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
6
Alteration of the oral microbiota may be a responsible factor, along with estrogen deficiency, by the development of larger periapical lesions.口腔微生物群的改变可能是导致更大根尖病变发展的一个原因,其与雌激素缺乏有关。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun;25(6):3651-3662. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03688-5. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
7
Harmful chemicals emitted from electronic cigarettes and potential deleterious effects in the oral cavity.电子烟释放的有害化学物质及其在口腔中的潜在有害影响。
Tob Induc Dis. 2020 May 8;18:41. doi: 10.18332/tid/116988. eCollection 2020.
8
Clinical, microbiological, and immunological evaluation of patients in corrective orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗患者的临床、微生物学和免疫学评估。
Prog Orthod. 2020 Feb 17;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00307-7.
9
Microbial species associated with dental caries found in saliva and in situ after use of self-ligating and conventional brackets.唾液中和使用自锁托槽和传统托槽后原位中与龋齿相关的微生物种类。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:e20180426. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0426. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
Orthodontic appliances did not increase risk of dental caries and periodontal disease under preventive protocol.正畸矫治器在预防方案下不会增加龋齿和牙周病的风险。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Jan;89(1):25-32. doi: 10.2319/022118-139.1. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e71227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071227. eCollection 2013.
4
Effects of 2 bracket and ligation types on plaque retention: a quantitative microbiologic analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction.两种托槽结扎类型对菌斑滞留的影响:实时聚合酶链反应的定量微生物分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.022.
5
LPS-induced inflammatory response after therapy of aggressive periodontitis.LPS 诱导侵袭性牙周炎治疗后的炎症反应。
J Dent Res. 2013 Aug;92(8):702-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034513495242. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
6
Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.自锁托槽与传统托槽的系统评价:初始疼痛、就诊次数、治疗时间
J Orofac Orthop. 2013 Jan;74(1):40-51. doi: 10.1007/s00056-012-0116-x. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
7
Self-ligating brackets do not increase treatment efficiency.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jan;143(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.012.
8
Can salivary activity predict periodontal breakdown in A. actinomycetemcomitans infected adolescents?唾液活动能否预测感染 A. actinomycetemcomitans 的青少年牙周破坏?
Arch Oral Biol. 2013 Jun;58(6):611-20. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
9
The oral microbiome in health and disease.口腔微生物组与健康和疾病。
Pharmacol Res. 2013 Mar;69(1):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.11.006. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
10
The effect of two different bracket types on the salivary levels of S mutans and S sobrinus in the early phase of orthodontic treatment.两种不同托槽类型在正畸治疗早期对变形链球菌和远缘链球菌唾液水平的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Jan;83(1):140-5. doi: 10.2319/030612-187.1. Epub 2012 Jul 5.