Häggman-Laitila Arja, Mattila Lea-Riitta, Melender Hanna-Leena
Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. BOX 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Niittyrannankuja 5, Helsinki, Finland.
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Aug;43:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 May 5.
To gather, assess and synthesise the currently available evidence of educational interventions on evidence-based nursing (EBN).
Previous systematic reviews have focused on the items used in reporting educational interventions for facilitating evidence-based practices in medicine and health care or teaching research literacy in nursing as well as on the outcomes of these interventions.
A systematic review based on a procedure of the Centre for Reviews and Disseminations for conducting a systematic review of health interventions.
Texts from 2008 to 2015 were sought from the Cochrane, CINAHL and PubMed Medline databases. Eight studies were selected for the final data and reviewed for quality. Data were analysed with narrative synthesis including qualitative content analysis.
Four main categories and sixteen subcategories were identified. The learning contents included principles of EBN and research, the process of EBN, and planning a change in practice. The most popular teaching/learning methods were lectures/didactic presentations and group work. The interventions encouraged learners to critically examine and evaluate their practice. The interventions also improved participants' capacity to identify the need for research evidence in clinical practice.
The educational interventions were fairly similar and had promising results. However, as the level of evidence was modest in the studies, there are several development needs for interventions and further research challenges. Interventions should provide participants with sufficient competences for implementing every step of EBN, with special focus on the implementation of evidence in patient care. The assessment of the outcomes of interventions should cover all learning categories of EBN with focus on medium to long-term effectiveness. The influence of different teaching/learning methods and learning contexts and settings should be investigated further.
收集、评估和综合目前关于循证护理(EBN)教育干预的现有证据。
以往的系统评价主要关注用于报告促进医学和医疗保健循证实践或护理研究素养教学的教育干预措施的项目,以及这些干预措施的结果。
基于循证医学中心开展卫生干预系统评价程序的系统评价。
从Cochrane、CINAHL和PubMed Medline数据库中检索2008年至2015年的文献。最终选取八项研究进行数据并评估质量。采用包括定性内容分析在内的叙述性综合分析数据。
确定了四个主要类别和十六个子类别。学习内容包括循证护理的原则与研究、循证护理的过程以及规划实践变革。最常用的教学方法是讲座/讲授式演示和小组作业。这些干预措施鼓励学习者批判性地审视和评估他们的实践。干预措施还提高了参与者识别临床实践中研究证据需求的能力。
教育干预措施相当相似且效果良好。然而,由于研究中的证据水平一般,干预措施存在一些发展需求和进一步的研究挑战。干预措施应使参与者具备实施循证护理每一步骤的足够能力,特别关注在患者护理中证据的实施。干预措施结果的评估应涵盖循证护理的所有学习类别,重点关注中长期效果。应进一步研究不同教学方法、学习背景和环境的影响。